Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Based on the construction I've seen, this Home Depot would be built closer to the highway. There's still a considerly amount of land between this Home Depot and the apartments. Either way, sounds like a huge downgrade to me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see a lot of logic in Home Depot wanting to build here

- its near other big stores (Target, Kroger)

- There's no Lowe's or Home Depot nearby - its sufficiently far from Gulfgate and Meyerland

- It's a large tract of land, one of the few that could fit their very large stores + parking lots

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is both a Home Depot (location is called Brinkman) & Lowe's on the other side of the Heights off 610, about 5 miles away...

With the amount of renovating going on in the area I guess the demand is adequate

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I’m thrilled about the idea of Home Depot coming here. It will be so much more convenient than the ones along 610.

That being said... it BETTER be a better design than a large suburban parking lot wasteland...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not holding my breath for this shit. Disappointing isn't even the word to describe this. We're going to get the typical massive parking lot and big box center. I thought "Lower Heights" was supposed to become this cool walkable area. Where does this even fit on the original site plan?

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh, that area does need a Home Depot cuz while it is 5 mile drive, its 5 miles on typically busy highway so its a bit of a pain in the butt. Plus, like some noted a metric ton of development is going on in the Heights (both small and big) so there is a clear need.

All that said, dang its a lot of parking. I'm wondering if HD caught wind of this development and just threw a big bag of cash at them. Its kind of funny, the most appealing images in that PDF are the neighborhood buildings shown at the end 😂

Edited by X.R.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW this completely went to trash. I'm speechless. And we wonder why we can't compete against other cities. This is embarrassing. All of this land could be super dense, urban, walkable. And again we're left with a bunch of parking lots. Both Buffalo Heights District and Lower Heights District turned in to nothing. I'm so annoyed. 

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compete against other cities? We have more people moving here than dang near any other city in the country.

That site looks very walkable. You park in the middle, you can hit up a grocery store, a home improvement store, a Target, and then nab some booze on the way back to your vehicle.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gmac said:

Compete against other cities? We have more people moving here than dang near any other city in the country.

That site looks very walkable. You park in the middle, you can hit up a grocery store, a home improvement store, a Target, and then nab some booze on the way back to your vehicle.

You can't be serious. And what I mean by compete, I don't mean we have to be in some race with other cities but I would be lying if I said other cities don't at least try to make things better for pedestrians FIRST. I went to Chicago recently and their idea of parking is either on street or a parking garage. I saw very few parking lots. I see few few sidewalks in this site plan. 

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Katyville strikes again.  Honestly, I think they were just too slow to the punch to make this into a nice urban mixed used development.  Too many projects around town (MKT, post office, Sawyer Yards and the Allen Pkwy developments) have sucked the wind out of the kind of leasing that this would have needed.  

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gmac said:

Compete against other cities? We have more people moving here than dang near any other city in the country.

That site looks very walkable. You park in the middle, you can hit up a grocery store, a home improvement store, a Target, and then nab some booze on the way back to your vehicle.

What’s disappointing for many, myself included, was the original plan was much more complex (more of a mini city center). Yes, it is walkable but the original plan was for a more lifestyle center with restaurants/bars and a movie theatre. You could park along the streets and walk around to shop while stopping to grab a bite to eat or drink. Now it’s just turned into a stop and go strip center with an anchor. Nothing desirable for those living in the city looking for the city lifestyle. 
 

Houston isn’t the most walk friendly city so having these type of centers scattered around make them very desirable for those is us who chose to live in the area.  Especially if you want to just walk across the street (or just out of your apartment for those living in the new apartments) as a convenient option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, texan said:

The worst part for me is the trail access this will have (albeit to a still unrepaired bridge). The Home Depot lot would've been perfect for restaurants, bars, and small retail with a nice gateway from the trail. It could've been another cluster on that rail-trail that would've linked up with MKT, Heights Mercantile, and White Oak Blvd.

Exactly! You would think as a developer you would try to really take advantage of the infrastructure in place to maximize the potential of your development. Instead we have developers that are so boring and nearsighted, they think they're providing this awesome retail center, but they're brains are stuck in the past. Yeah it provides some services for the immediate area and those living around it, but it's nothing that will last, it's nothing sustainable, and it's just plain BORING. It doesn't help that Metro is planning an BRT stop here in an area where the sidewalks all look like an afterthought. And it make NO SENSE why the entrance to Lower Heights District doesn't have sidewalks leading to the development. How freaking dumb are these people? Yet the city was quick to make a right turn lane and widen the street even more for this non sense. 

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, skooljunkie said:

Sigh.

At least the little trail they built will be well lit by the headlights of semi-trucks unloading Up & Up and plywood.

So, there’s usually never a Home Depot without a Lowe’s right around the corner. Just sayin’...

If you're talking about the crushed granite trail by the Target, they fenced it off and can't be used for now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2021 at 1:49 PM, j_cuevas713 said:

I'm not holding my breath for this shit. Disappointing isn't even the word to describe this. We're going to get the typical massive parking lot and big box center. I thought "Lower Heights" was supposed to become this cool walkable area. Where does this even fit on the original site plan?

Oh, it's very walkable, if you live in Sawyer Heights lofts, or nearby apartments. The real trouble is the traffic and streets. It's congested AF. I certainly add to the car lines on Spring St.

The area has densified from just warehouses and single family homes. It'll take time to grow. Unfortunately, we're not Dubai or Miami where we can just sprout condo buildings non-stop. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just chalk this one up as another inner loop missed oppty. There are so many I think im numb to it. Access to this center really impacts how often I go/will go. I'll be curious if the Home Depot ends up a sh%thole like the one on 610 or nice like the one on Katy Fwy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2021 at 6:40 PM, texan said:

The worst part for me is the trail access this will have (albeit to a still unrepaired bridge). The Home Depot lot would've been perfect for restaurants, bars, and small retail with a nice gateway from the trail. It could've been another cluster on that rail-trail that would've linked up with MKT, Heights Mercantile, and White Oak Blvd.

That would have been nice, but the developer probably looked at the numbers that are just about guaranteed with the new layout, and decided to take that return on investment as opposed to doing something outside the norm for here, and potentially losing big time. Especially if the developer is hoping to flip the whole thing in a year or two. And, from a management perspective, it's easier to manage a few large tenants than a pile of small ones. Home Depot is going to be paying the rent on time, while the smaller places can be flaky, then just close.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ross said:

That would have been nice, but the developer probably looked at the numbers that are just about guaranteed with the new layout, and decided to take that return on investment as opposed to doing something outside the norm for here, and potentially losing big time. Especially if the developer is hoping to flip the whole thing in a year or two. And, from a management perspective, it's easier to manage a few large tenants than a pile of small ones. Home Depot is going to be paying the rent on time, while the smaller places can be flaky, then just close.

That does make sense. This section from Sawyer to Studewood would be fine if there was just better pedestrian focus. If that means widening sidewalks or providing better access for pedestrians, then it could still become very inviting. But when you have sidewalks that look like an afterthought along Studewood, with no real connectivity under the freeway or along the bridge, it just looks like a big shit show. And the fact the developers didn’t build sidewalks along the entrance to LHD is just mind boggling. 

Edited by j_cuevas713
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, j_cuevas713 said:

That does make sense. This section from Sawyer to Studewood would be fine if there was just better pedestrian focus. If that means widening sidewalks or providing better access for pedestrians, then it could still become very inviting. But when you have sidewalks that look like an afterthought along Studewood, with no real connectivity under the freeway or along the bridge, it just looks like a big shit show. And the fact the developers didn’t build sidewalks along the entrance to LHD is just mind boggling. 

I certainly don't disagree with you about the crappy design and construction of sidewalks all over Houston. It's abysmal and inexcusable. I have a friend who is basically blind, can't drive (though he would likely not be any worse than 90% of the boobs on the street now), and has a heck of a time walking places because of the erratic nature of the sidewalks.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Visitor said:

I'll just chalk this one up as another inner loop missed oppty. There are so many I think im numb to it. Access to this center really impacts how often I go/will go. I'll be curious if the Home Depot ends up a sh%thole like the one on 610 or nice like the one on Katy Fwy.

Hey, all Houston area Home Depots are top drawer compared to Gulfgate.

I wonder where Lowe's will go? Their business model is to follow the depot. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are still plenty of large warehouses along Shepherd/Durham just north of I-10! Perfect for Lowe's. The sheetflow from the parking lot can dump straight into White Oak. No problemo.  And I'm still waiting on that 945-pump Central Houston Buc-ee's. I hope all these developers leave 20-30 acres for that.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...