Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, urbanize713 said:

 

Noooooo...I was in Denver recently and this renaming of areas has run amok there. In my opinion, we should avoid it anywhere we can. 

 

Once you get professional marketing folks involved it's all downhill (DoHi).

  • Haha 6
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On ‎2019‎-‎10‎-‎01 at 5:15 PM, august948 said:

 

Once you get professional marketing folks involved it's all downhill (DoHi).

Hopefully, if something is too artificial it will meet a justified demise.

Posted
38 minutes ago, Specwriter said:

Hopefully, if something is too artificial it will meet a justified demise.

 

SoDo isn't any more artificial than EaDo.

Posted
43 minutes ago, cspwal said:

At least EaDo is an easy to define area - downtown east of 59, mainly centered on St Emanuel street

 

Where is Sodo?  

 

Sounds like it is the area north of the junction of 45 and 59.

Posted (edited)

"SoDo isn't any more artificial than EaDo."

I agree, august948. SoDo is neither more or less so than Eado.  😊

Edited by Specwriter
removed extra word
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Now that we are naming areas of downtown proper, we'll also need to rebrand EaDo to the more geographically accurate SoEaDo so we can free up the EaDo moniker for area around Discovery Green and Minute Maid.

 

I'll propose DoDo (Downtown Downtown) for the very center.

4 hours ago, bobruss said:

So are we going to call the area around the historic district  NoDoz?

 

Given the number of homeless in that area, shouldn't we call it NoDough?

Edited by august948
  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
Posted

We can call the areas with high concentrations of homeless NoDough  as august 948 suggests and the areas with the big banks MoDo, and areas that flood as LoDo. I especially like the suggestion of DoDo.

  • Haha 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

It's too bad the park didn't take up the entire block. It's such a Houston thing for a tiny park in Downtown have a big parking lot attached to it. 

 

I wonder if the DRA tried to acquire that parcel but couldn't, or if they intentionally left it there because of Houston's ridiculous minimum parking requirements.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/29/2018 at 12:09 AM, cspwal said:

So they had the planning meetings this Thursday and Saturday, and I went to both.  It is very much still in the planning stages; the Saturday session was a full on brainstorming session with the 21 people who showed up.

 

A few details that I learned:

  • They were only able to acquire a 30 year lease on the good year property and the parking lot at the corner of Leeland and San Jacinto.  The land is owned by a trust that won't let them sell it but they can do a lease.
  • The Southern Texas College of Law didn't want to give up their parking lot to let this be a full block park - the current plan is a fence between it and the park.
  • The project is already fully funded by the Downtown Redevelopment Authority
  • Goodyear's lease is up in March, and they expect construction on the park to start in April.
  • They're targeting a Summer 2020 opening date.

Here are the boards from the happy hour with the categories they're looking at.  I couldn't figure out how this broken forum software could let me embed the photos.

 

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/928/29833049758_609bf90afd_k.jpg 

 

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/934/29833051638_dd53b58186_k.jpg 

 

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/857/43656374522_78fddc6f41_k.jpg 

 

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/859/29833051348_756790e647_k.jpg 

 

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/862/43656371632_d549f53e73_k.jpg 

 

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/860/29833050268_82c6d5236d_k.jpg 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Howard Huge said:

It's too bad the park didn't take up the entire block. It's such a Houston thing for a tiny park in Downtown have a big parking lot attached to it. 

 

I wonder if the DRA tried to acquire that parcel but couldn't, or if they intentionally left it there because of Houston's ridiculous minimum parking requirements.

 

One thing we know with absolute certainty:  It had/has nothing to do with any minimum parking requirements. (There are no minimum parking requirements in downtown Houston.)

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Howard Huge said:

It's too bad the park didn't take up the entire block. It's such a Houston thing for a tiny park in Downtown have a big parking lot attached to it. 

 

I wonder if the DRA tried to acquire that parcel but couldn't, or if they intentionally left it there because of Houston's ridiculous minimum parking requirements.

I believe the lot is owned by South Texas law school. Apparently they didn't want to sell. 

  • Like 3
Posted
53 minutes ago, Sanjorade said:

I believe the lot is owned by South Texas law school. Apparently they didn't want to sell. 

Hate that they don't want to contribute to the revitalization of down 

  • Like 6
Posted
5 hours ago, Houston19514 said:

 

One thing we know with absolute certainty:  It had/has nothing to do with any minimum parking requirements. (There are no minimum parking requirements in downtown Houston.)

Well that's good.

  • 6 months later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Apparently bids came in above budget. Looks like the ground breaking will be delayed:

 

http://www.downtowndistrict.org/static/media/uploads/Board Books/201008_hdmd_board_materials.pdf

 

Southern Downtown Park: Following public advertisement (July 16-30, 2020) for contractor procurement, two valid proposals were submitted on August 20, 2020 per the competitive sealed proposal method. A 5-member evaluation panel reviewed both proposals. Based on the evaluation process, staff presented its recommendation for the preferred general contractor to the Authority’s Capital Projects Committee (CPC) on September 3, 2020, which subsequently directed staff and consultants to initiate a value engineering process with the contractor, as both proposals received exceed the project’s budget. Staff and the preferred contractor were not able to achieve sufficient savings during the VE process. Upon advisement from the CPC, the Authority intends to re-bid the project later in 2020 which results in the project construction and final delivery being postponed, likely during 1Q 2021 but the specific project timeline has not been finalized as of this memo.

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 6
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Here is some info from the TIRZ regarding this project:

 

 

The Southern Downtown Park is a 2021 capital improvement project of the Downtown Redevelopment Authority.  Bidding documents are currently out to contractors, with bids due January 25th.  If all goes well, we will seek board approval on February 9th to enter agreement with contractor who provides the best proposal, with an estimated one-year construction schedule to commence in early March / final completion in early April 2022

  • Like 7
  • The title was changed to New Park For The Southern Area Of Downtown
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...