Jump to content

36-Story Multifamily High-Rise At 3615 Montrose Blvd.


yaga

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Dakota79 said:

I thought there would be high rises there. Too bad.

To each their own, I guess. I don't have a problem with high-rises fundamentally, but in Houston they tend to be pretty set back and generally disengaged from the street. The Southeastern building in the rendering doesn't look like anything special, but at least it helps move the street toward something a bit more like contiguity. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2022 at 4:20 PM, jmitch94 said:

It looks set back far enough from Montrose that the trees might be kept. I really hope the trees are not cut down. 

The trees look to be in the city right-of-way.  Wouldn't that require city approval to cut them down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 1:01 PM, august948 said:

The trees look to be in the city right-of-way.  Wouldn't that require city approval to cut them down?

I doubt they'll be cut unless the developer are planning to redo the sidewalk. They will probably trim the branches though, since they overhang quite far.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, kennyc05 said:

Do these oak trees tear up sidewalks in roads because they weren't correctly planted back in the day? And wouldn't the Post oaks on Post Oak Boulevard do the same one day once they got bigger?

The answer to both is yes. As we all know Live Oaks get enormous as they gain years. That is part of their beauty. This is what gives the area around Rice and The Audubon area of New Orleans it's charm. Expect the roots to move sidewalks and work around that. This should not be a difficult problem to resolve.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2022 at 3:26 PM, Twinsanity02 said:

The answer to both is yes. As we all know Live Oaks get enormous as they gain years. That is part of their beauty. This is what gives the area around Rice and The Audubon area of New Orleans it's charm. Expect the roots to move sidewalks and work around that. This should not be a difficult problem to resolve.

Houston is only 186 years old.  There's no way anyone could possibly anticipate that live oaks would push up sidewalks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, editor said:

Houston is only 186 years old.  There's no way anyone could possibly anticipate that live oaks would push up sidewalks.

I don't think one follows the other.  In my neighborhood there are some absolutely enormous live oaks that were planted in the late 1930s.  Most people assume they are hundreds of years old but they are not.  So sidewalks have existed longer than many of the live oaks that are interfering with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rechlin said:

I don't think one follows the other.  In my neighborhood there are some absolutely enormous live oaks that were planted in the late 1930s.  Most people assume they are hundreds of years old but they are not.  So sidewalks have existed longer than many of the live oaks that are interfering with them.

I guess my point is that people have known for centuries that trees push up sidewalks, so the builders of sidewalks should compensate.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Vero Sade must have done a press release because the Houston Chronicle also has a story about their projects.

"A Houston-based development group has acquired prime sites in Houston and other cities for multifamily developments, including proposed projects in the Montrose and Heights neighborhoods.

Sade is also chairman of Sade Capital, a company specializing in multifamily and other assets. Daniel Bassichis is co-founder of New York and Texas-based Vero, formerly Admiral Capital Group, where he partners with retired San Antonio Spurs star and Basketball Hall of Famer David Robinson on investments that create value and make a positive social impact."

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/real-estate/article/Houston-developer-announces-2B-pipeline-of-17475225.php#photo-22986376

Azml8MB.jpg

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I don't think anyone else has brought it up, but the FAA filing for this was released back in June and has a determination height of 490' down from 512' (DNE of 499' AGL/549' AMSL at that site). Obviously that won't much affect the number of floors given its already generous height. Does anyone know of any elevation diagrams for this and/or if the most recent ones were for 490'?

Also, it seems the working name--at least at that time--was "Montrose A1".

image.png.e5abb4abba8f3f6b12f58aa30b520f03.png

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Clementine said:

I don't think anyone else has brought it up, but the FAA filing for this was released back in June and has a determination height of 490' down from 512' (DNE of 499' AGL/549' AMSL at that site). Obviously that won't much affect the number of floors given its already generous height. Does anyone know of any elevation diagrams for this and/or if the most recent ones were for 490'?

Also, it seems the working name--at least at that time--was "Montrose A1".

image.png.e5abb4abba8f3f6b12f58aa30b520f03.png

It has been discussed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...