Jump to content

102-Story Tower Planned


lockmat

Recommended Posts

as an employee as per "fluor daniel corporation" i have the privilege of working inside the "theater of afghanistan".  i have been employed within the confines of this beautiful and yet extremely dangerous "war zone" as per the duration of (8+ years).  dubai, uae, is considered our company's "port of entry" in and out of afghanistan respectively.

 

i shall concur completely with "sellanious caesar" as per his post.  for i have harbored the opportunity to witness these "outside worker's" first hand during my time within the "middle east".

 

malaysia, phillipines, kuala lumpur, tibet, india, mongolia...   just to name a few of the many countries, that are sending their respective worker's to build and transform dubai, uae.  most of these "worker's" lack all sorts of mental, physical, and safety measures to add to their skill sets, as well as an overall employment well being.  in other words...  they work in extreme "hazardous" conditions, with very little and oftentimes no pay.

 

i have visited the "dubai mall" many times as they were building the "burj khalifa".  i could literally step outside of the "mall" and walk right up to the building itself.   simply amazing edifice.  however, yes!  the "middle east" is notorious as per building and transforming itself at the expense of desperate and vulnerable "outside workers".  as they save "billions" of dollars achieving this method upon their world class propositions, as well as objectives.

 

Cheap labor and materials. The Middle East is notorious for importing near free labor and from Vietnam to Turkey and Russia is some of the worlds largest steel manufacturers. Cost to purchase and import material is inexpensive compared to the US.

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

To put into new perspective, $2 billion is the price for the Chicago Spire at 2,000 feet in a state where everything costs more (imports, labor, contract, land value, etc). That's an example of a project for one tower in this price range. $2 billion is also the price for Metropolis in LA (costs about the same as Chicago, cheaper import material and labor but more expensive land value), a project with multiple high density towers.

From the way I see it $2 billion will buy you a winner for DT, supertall or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To put into new perspective, $2 billion is the price for the Chicago Spire at 2,000 feet in a state where everything costs more (imports, labor, contract, land value, etc). That's an example of a project for one tower in this price range. $2 billion is also the price for Metropolis in LA (costs about the same as Chicago, cheaper import material and labor but more expensive land value), a project with multiple high density towers.

From the way I see it $2 billion will buy you a winner for DT, supertall or not.

 

Thats a good way to put things...Supertall or something like metropolis is a win win, heck anything is...I'm sure this one, if true, won't disappoint.

 

According to Nancy's article on the amREIT property in the Galleria area, the Uptown Park redevelopment is 1.2 billion.

 

This has to be the most costly development in the city right now huh??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as an employee as per "fluor daniel corporation" i have the privilege of working inside the "theater of afghanistan". i have been employed within the confines of this beautiful and yet extremely dangerous "war zone" as per the duration of (8+ years). dubai, uae, is considered our company's "port of entry" in and out of afghanistan respectively.

i shall concur completely with "sellanious caesar" as per his post. for i have harbored the opportunity to witness these "outside worker's" first hand during my time within the "middle east".

malaysia, phillipines, kuala lumpur, tibet, india, mongolia... just to name a few of the many countries, that are sending their respective worker's to build and transform dubai, uae. most of these "worker's" lack all sorts of mental, physical, and safety measures to add to their skill sets, as well as an overall employment well being. in other words... they work in extreme "hazardous" conditions, with very little and oftentimes no pay.

i have visited the "dubai mall" many times as they were building the "burj khalifa". i could literally step outside of the "mall" and walk right up to the building itself. simply amazing edifice. however, yes! the "middle east" is notorious as per building and transforming itself at the expense of desperate and vulnerable "outside workers". as they save "billions" of dollars achieving this method upon their world class propositions, as well as objectives.

I'm from Australia and visited Dubai a few years ago. I hate that city with a passion. I was nearly charged for being a little tipsy from what I drank on the plane at the airport there. They kept asking me what drugs I have, what drugs I possess, if I'm willing to do a test. I showed them I made a few purchases of the beverages on the plane and that because I'm not a frequent drinker I reacted to it in a dizzying daze when it mixed with my allergy medicine (Dytan). They told me the rules in the Emirate and wished me an enjoyable trip but the experience scared me.

In Dubai i saw plenty of expats mostly from India, many families living together in lowly slums, crammed into an apartment with each other since that's all their labor wages could afford.

UAE is a country where you have to be very careful who you say things to and what you do. It can land you in deep trouble but back to skyscrapers. The supertalls are cheaper to build in the Middle East than anywhere else, due to exploited labor laws and wages. It's why they're able to successfully build so many supertalls and tall towers every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To put into new perspective, $2 billion is the price for the Chicago Spire at 2,000 feet in a state where everything costs more (imports, labor, contract, land value, etc). That's an example of a project for one tower in this price range. $2 billion is also the price for Metropolis in LA (costs about the same as Chicago, cheaper import material and labor but more expensive land value), a project with multiple high density towers.

From the way I see it $2 billion will buy you a winner for DT, supertall or not.

Probably the best example we have here. If we truly have a $2 billion project, it could certainly make it the tallest in the United States. Unless it is a multiple block project of multiple buildings...

WTC is a special case at $3 billion especially because of security and not to mention it's been in the works for over a decade.

 

Either way, we're just tossing around ideas and won't know until something more comes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a rumored 2 billion dollar project does not mean a single building.  i realize we wish for a super tall but a "development" could be any number of things.  (in my mind i'm hearing "a renzo piano shard, a renzo piano shard")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a rumored 2 billion dollar project does not mean a single building.  i realize we wish for a super tall but a "development" could be any number of things.  (in my mind i'm hearing "a renzo piano shard, a renzo piano shard")

woah. i never realized Piano designed the Shard.. very cool! you are right, it doesnt necessarily mean a single building. but considering the costs of other supertalls, if its really a 2 billion dollar development, there would likely be a supertall anchor building (or i dont think its too far out of the question at least). we are naming insanely expensive buildings with very technical designs (Burj Khalifa, The Shard, WTC [thats so expensive more because of the extreme over engineering involved in the buildings and security]) that are some of the most expensive buildings in the world..

Williams Tower recently sold for 412 million. and its 901'.. like someone else mentioned, we could easily get a 1000 footer, along with something in the 200 meter range, or even more (or taller) towers.. it just depends on how large the mixed use component is at the base of the tower and what else is incorporated into the development.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_buildings_in_the_world

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I saw swtsig add some credibility to these rumors my heart jumped.

He has given us the inside scoop on many projects and has never lied or been wrong, so there HAS to be something to the rumor of a $2B project, I trust him.

Now whether or not it is a $2B TOWER or just a cluster of development, either way that is one gigantic project, something that puts itself on the map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the Heung Kong Tower: 987 feet (7th rendering from the top). That project would look perfect in Downtown Houston. That China Cheung Tower looks perfect for Uptown Houston.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=210563

Thoughts?

I like it, but it reminds me a lot of the new Chevron Tower. I'd prefer something else on that list for downtown. I do agree though that the China Cheung Tower would be perfect Uptown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why people love The Shard? It reminds me very much of the Ryugyong Hotel in Pyongyang, DKR.

http://en.wikipedia..../Ryugyong_Hotel

http://www.forbes.co...os-shard-tower/

I think the Ryugyong Hotel looks like it would be in a Batman movie or something. The proportions are off.

I would love to see something like The Shard though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see the Shard as anything great.  Besides that something here with that size floorplates would be a waste.

I think the Shard works perfectly with London. It is surrounded by not-so attractive buildings (guy's hospital). So this soaring shard of bright blue glass stands out literally like a shard of beautiful glass in a pile of dirt. It works well being solely the tallest structure around. If it was surrounded by buildings with a similar facade/height, it would immediately lose it's dominating beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shard type building would be perfect for Houston as a bookend (like the post office site), or bordering Hermann Park, Allen Pkwy, Memorial Park.......I agree it would lose its effectiveness in the middle of other towers; on the othet hand, there are many places on Houston an iconic structure like the shard would make a huge impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shard type building would be perfect for Houston as a bookend (like the post office site), or bordering Hermann Park, Allen Pkwy, Memorial Park.......I agree it would lose its effectiveness in the middle of other towers; on the othet hand, there are many places on Houston an iconic structure like the shard would make a huge impact.

If I could teleport the Shard to Houston, it would be in Midtown, very close to 59.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 102-story is true, I wonder if they're relying on the incentives? Maybe that's part of the reason it was increased???

Also, did all the ones he listed below come true? And did he reveal any of them before we knew about them? That would further his credibility.

Red john:

You can add a few more on your list. Block 52 in Downtown (28 stories), a 35 story residential highrise in Downtown, another 28 story residential highrise in Downtown by a Chicago developer, another 25 story residential highrise in Downtown by Hines, 28 story residential tower by ZC near the convention district in Downtown, the 38 story tower next to the Texaco building downtown, which that building is also being converted into residential lofts. The 42 story Helix tower in the Museum District (south of Midtown and also on the light rail line). The Southmore in the Museum District by Hines, also 35 stories and along the light rail line. All of these being confirmed projects, already locked on finances and nearly all doing site work, all along the light rail line. Being a skyscraper enthusiast, I'm not going to bother listing the midrises but you've got the big ones on your list already.

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/city-vs-city/2010443-houston-lightrail-vs-phoenix-lightrail-rail-2.html#ixzz2xptSAtch

Apparently Red John knows about the supertall in Uptown too. From a post in April 2013:

Edit: I think he maybe talking about the Deyaar though.

For the longterm there's the supertall in downtown and the other supertall in uptown (both above 1,000 feet) that have been silently flying under the radar. The one in downtown is making some under the radar splashes but both of them are still looking for a scheduled date to get stuff going. Also midtown's entertainment square like development, street level will look like this. Also the slowly progressing Malik development too.

http://www.city-data.com/forum/urban-planning/1827254-tall-buildings-under-construction-your-city-3.html#post28924932

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently Red John knows about the supertall in Uptown too. From a post in April 2013:

Edit: I think he maybe talking about the Deyaar though.

http://www.city-data.com/forum/urban-planning/1827254-tall-buildings-under-construction-your-city-3.html#post28924932

 

Most of what he says is true / on point. The only issue is, he maybe had all the info a year ago. It seems like either the process of taking an idea to making it happen is a long one - and many of his insight has evolved since... I just wonder if months ago the super talls in uptown and downtown were being planned, why we havent had any more detail at all about it. I hope these both come true!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is true and they still own it, they must be trying to improve that area, especially between BBVA and MMP, helping to connect the two. I can't imagine it taking two years for hcad to update their database.

Yeah, MMP incorporates a train station in its design and the parking lot is on an old railyard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a supertall were to be built downtown, where would should it be built?  

 

I was thinking that the Louisiana-Walker-Milam-McKinney block that was intended for the Bank of the Southwest Tower would be an obvious choice, although for something of this scope I could see the developers wanting to utilize two blocks for parking or retail. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Subdude I'm thinking that that block would be too small although that would be where it would fit in best in downtown.

I am thinking north of MMP or on those lots next to Exxon on Bell would be good.

Doubt a developer would find the SE attractive since it would be around all those apartments.

North of MMP would be new territory and choose to the hotel district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I say the block is small, I didn't mean it is smaller than the rest. I have just noticed that a lot of these new super tall building's come with clusters of smaller buildings plus plaza/ courtyard.

Was just thinking that a new supertall would do something similar and take up a couple of blocks.

As for parking, jesus how many spots would be needed for that behemoth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it should go where everyone's favorite building is located, the Days Inn.  Or it can be placed one block west of the Days Inn, and then replace the Days Inn with the garage.  Either way, the Days Inn is getting pulverized!   :D

 

This along with the new Chevron tower can put a lot of pressure on the landlords of the towers nearby to renovate (2016 Main, Houston House Apartments, Savoy/Holiday Inn if it still looks bad after its renovation) because everything around this area is just ugly, and the people living here deserve better.  Perhaps there will be a greater incentive to submerge the Pierce elevated freeway and widen it too.

 

The views would be clear in all directions from this location, and you have the view of downtown on one side, and Midtown & the TMC on the other.  If the FAA raises a concern, you first ignore them, and second you place a big, tall stylish antenna (paying respect to One Shell Plaza) with alternating blinking red lights.

 

Anyways, that would be the spot I'll pick.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of having it on the east side somewhere between MMP and Toyota Center. It would be cool to see highrises fill in between it and the tall towers on the west side. Plus it would help spur development on that side faster. The central/west side already has Main to cause growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a supertall were to be built downtown, where would should it be built?

I was thinking that the Louisiana-Walker-Milam-McKinney block that was intended for the Bank of the Southwest Tower would be an obvious choice, although for something of this scope I could see the developers wanting to utilize two blocks for parking or retail.

That's the exact block I would want a supertall on. That block would have the tower in the middle of both the northern skyline viewpoint from 45 and the western skyline view from Buffalo Bayou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


All of the HAIF
None of the ads!
HAIF+
Just
$5!


×
×
  • Create New...