20thStDad Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Maybe the ugly side of this building should have a giant 20-story jumbotron facing the park. Think of advertising revenue. All the haifers that want more lighting for DT at night would be so happy.That reminds me of the fun, heated debate about the tackiness of public jumbo-trons in the Houston Pavilions thread. There was much disagreement. As far as I know, there are still no jumbo-trons at HP and there may never have been any plans for any. We tend to make things up and run with it in this wild west internet place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Is the remaining parcel of land owned by the hotel for possible parking? If so the utilization of this land was pretty stupid and a bad move fiscally speaking.Separate parcel, a fair bit bigger than the one Embassy Suites is on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtticaFlinch Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I just don't think, at the end of the day, people not like us, will be at Discovery Green or the GRB and say, "ya know, that's a pretty ugly building, but hey, pretty cool that it's there anyway." They'll just think, "dang, that's kinda ugly."I think most people at Disco Green will actually be focusing their attention on the cooling waters of the fully functional fountains rather than the buildings surrounding the park. It's hot here, and all. Priorities.I'll register my disgust with the building's facade by not ever renting a room there. Granted, I probably won't ever rent a room in the same city as where my house is located, but still... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 It's a reasonably intensive use of the site, considering how tiny a parcel of land it is.I suppose you're right. I guess we should not expect too much for the east side of downtown anyway. And I actually like the idea of two parcels on one block since that's how a lot of old buildings are, except these won't be touching. It'll make things look more dense though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Separate parcel, a fair bit bigger than the one Embassy Suites is on.Niche, you might be right, but gauging from the live cam, the one embassy suites is on looks much bigger than what remains. ES is on the wider half and the rest is on the skinnier half.live cam: http://oxblue.com/pro/open/linbeck/embassysuitesmaybe the square footage is bigger, but it sure is deceiving.Also, I assume they have enough parking in the garage? Or else if the other parcel ever gets built on, people will have to use on-street parking. Not that the surface parking has a ton of spaces, what, maybe 40? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Niche, you might be right, but gauging from the live cam, the one embassy suites is on looks much bigger than what remains. ES is on the wider half and the rest is on the skinnier half.live cam: http://oxblue.com/pro/open/linbeck/embassysuitesmaybe the square footage is bigger, but it sure is deceiving.Also, I assume they have enough parking in the garage? Or else if the other parcel ever gets built on, people will have to use on-street parking. Not that the surface parking has a ton of spaces, what, maybe 40?You could very nearly (within 5 or 10 feet) inscribe the Embassy Suites parcel within the adjacent parcel, and there are continuous lines that can be drawn to bisect the adjacent parcel at 340 feet, 275 feet, 270 feet, 210 feet, 200 feet, and so on. The narrowest portion of the parcel is 60 feet, about the width of one tier of the Four Seasons Hotel tower, over a couple blocks.As for parking, the City enforces parking requirements without very much flexibility. If the hotel is leasing surface spaces as their own anywhere in the vicinity so as to meet City requirements and that parcel gets developed, the hotel (or the new development) will have to come up with new spaces from somewhere, and it would not be on-street parking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Stonian Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 You mean the expansive view of downtown, there just one view of expansiveness, and thats towards the north. Parking lots,toyota center, hilton americas, scattered buildings, and more parking lots to the left/west. Parking lots, Discovery Tower, MMP, scattered structures, Harris Co. justice buildings, and more parking lots to the right/east. Not really expansive.And until those parking lots turn into something, I'd prefer a supertall that blocks out that view of the parking lots, but heck a 2 story structure can block that, so it doesn't really have to be a supertall.Well depending on where you're standing in Discovery Green looking west/southwest, you can still see the Enron/Chevron blgs., Continental, Houston Center, etc. as well as many of the taller skyscrapers on the west side of downtown, and if you get @ the right angle on sloped ground near the performance pavillon, you can even see Mainplace. So that's what I mean by "expansive" -- a view of towers other than just those immediately surrounding the park.Once you are deep inside the park, the parking lots in the vicinity are hardly noticeable because of the many trees and small structures throughout the park. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTAWACS Posted July 28, 2010 Share Posted July 28, 2010 Yep. Only Buckhead could get an Embassy Suites as cool as this... BTW, does Los Angeles even HAVE a downtown? No not anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 They've removed the covering, exposing the facade. From johnme at Skyscraperpage: She's a beaut! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 She's a beaut! is that sarcasm? i'm not gettin' a "beaut" feeling about this at all. it's a far cry from the first rendering. better than a parking lot, yes; attractive addition to discovery green area, nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 Yeah, I guess she's not a "beaut" but considering what it is, it's not half bad either.http://oxblue.com/pro/open/linbeck/embassysuites Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 is that sarcasm? i'm not gettin' a "beaut" feeling about this at all. it's a far cry from the first rendering. better than a parking lot, yes; attractive addition to discovery green area, nope.LOL yes I was being sarcastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 It does look pretty ugly. Maybe it's just the light? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatesdisastr Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 It does look pretty ugly. Maybe it's just the light?I wouldn't hold my breath on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20thStDad Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 I'm telling you, some urban art or maybe a full-building Rockets ad would do well there. Just put some lipstick on that pig! (and make $ off of it) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 Yeah, I guess she's not a "beaut" but considering what it is, it's not half bad either.http://oxblue.com/pro/open/linbeck/embassysuitesWow, this really has turned into an ugly building. They not only cut off the top, they made the color scheme more bland. I knew it was going to be 'ho-hum', but this really is 'bleh'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 This is very true. But in Velvet J's defense: since when did knowing what the hell you are talking about ever matter at HAIF. Suggesting that all those other cities don't allow ugly buildings to be built is asinine. Check out this beauty in dt dallas For all you haters out there, just be glad that a 19-story building like ES can't make that big of an impact downtown other than infill and to remove a part of a surface lot. But I would also suggest waiting until this building is finished to make your judgments. I spent about eight hours yesterday driving to and from Dallas. I think that the Sheraton is among the most architecturally interesting buildings in Texas, entirely because the proportions and massing are so classy. It is what makes my mouth water when I drive by downtown Dallas (on my way to the northern suburbs, consistently). Too bad we didn't get something more like that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 I spent about eight hours yesterday driving to and from Dallas. I think that the Sheraton is among the most architecturally interesting buildings in Texas, entirely because the proportions and massing are so classy. It is what makes my mouth water when I drive by downtown Dallas (on my way to the northern suburbs, consistently). Too bad we didn't get something more like that.Agreed on the Sheraton - great mid-century modern. Back when it was the Southland Center wasn't it banded in fluorescent lights? The Embassy Suites just looks so...cheap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 Cheap is the only way to describe the look of this Embassy Suites. They chopped off 3 floors. They eliminated the roof that would have tied the building a little bit to One Park Place. The worst part though, is they turned their back on the actual park. The UGLIEST part of the building faces the park. Actually, I take that back, the worst part is these developers got public money to help build this thing and this is what we got. For all the folks that cry about regulations, it is my wish that we have some sort of architectural commission for downtown buildings that receive public funds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 I'm telling you, some urban art or maybe a full-building Rockets ad would do well there. Just put some lipstick on that pig! (and make $ off of it)Agreed. They should put a big Yao Ming mural or something lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesternGulf Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Damn! My only hope is something else takes up the rest of the lot that blocks most of this structure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbigtex56 Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 What's Christo up to these days? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coaster Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 I spent about eight hours yesterday driving to and from Dallas. I think that the Sheraton is among the most architecturally interesting buildings in Texas, entirely because the proportions and massing are so classy. It is what makes my mouth water when I drive by downtown Dallas (on my way to the northern suburbs, consistently). Too bad we didn't get something more like that.From now on, every night before I go to bed I will say a prayer that niche and subdude are never put in charge of any building exteriors in Houston. I love mid-century architecture too, but the Sheraton tower in Dallas is the single ugliest building in dt Dallas. The top look likes a giant air conditioner vent. The tacky giant letters don't help. Having two sides with no windows on a tower that tall is a travesty. Worse yet, it is so prominent and ugly that it really does its part in ruining the Dallas skyline. I'd rather have ten more 19-story Embassy Suites in dt Houston that don't stand out, than that hideous monstrosity in Dallas. Thank you God almighty that we don't have one of these in Houston. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Is this the Sheraton tower that is being discussed? It doesn't do much for me, certainly doesn't make my mouth water. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 Is this the Sheraton tower that is being discussed? It doesn't do much for me, certainly doesn't make my mouth water. Must have to see it in person. I thought niche was being sarcastic. That thing is not nice at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Must have to see it in person. I thought niche was being sarcastic. That thing is not nice at all.No, no, I'm very serious. One of the classiest highrise buildings in Texas. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
713 To 214 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 You all think the facade and structure of the Downtown Dallas Sheraton is ugly? The view at street level is just as bad. I thought Starwood would have tried to do something to beautify the building, but alas, those hopes have been dashed.The DT Houston Embassy Suites I definitely unattractive, but IMHO the DT Dallas Sheraton has it beat In the ugliness department. On the bright side, though, these two buildings can only get better with time, and some architectural improvements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
totheskies Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 LOL at this point, I'm far-less concerned with the aesthetics of the Embassy Suites, and far more concerned about adding hotel rooms to the downtown market (thus bolstering our convention ability). BTW, anyone know of plans for the lobby?? I'd like to find out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asubrt Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 No specific date yet, but the website says the hotel will be opening in January 2011. Also there is some information, I'm not sure how much of this is already known/posted here. It will be the first LEED Certified hotel downtown.The Embassy Suites Houston Downtown is Houston’s first LEED Certified hotel in the downtown district and features:Atrium Lobby and Water FeaturesRoofscape Pool and SpaHigh-speed Internet Access / WIFI throughout entire hotel24 Hour Fitness Center by PreCor®Complimentary Cooked-to-order BreakfastComplimentary Evening Manager’s ReceptionOn-site Valet ParkingCourtesy Shuttle to downtown destinations24 Hour Embassy BusinessLink Business Center with Quick Charge StationGift shop with fully stocked pantry itemsRestaurant/Bar on-site with street level entryIn-Suite DiningDigital Concierge6,000 SF of Flexible Meeting & Banquet SpaceFamily friendly activities/entertainment on weekendsDestination Management Concierge Serviceshttp://embassysuites...J5PTECSGBI12VCQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bachanon Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 ..........unfortunately, all those great amenities do not make the building more appealing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.