Jump to content

Ivy Lofts: Condominium High-Rise At 2604 Leeland St.


Recommended Posts

"Bedroom/Dining" - this actually kind of makes sense.  Usually when you're by yourself you don't eat the table all the time - especially if there's a breakfast bar in the kitchen.  So the bedroom can stay a bedroom most of the time except when you want to have a fancy dinner.

 

If I had this layout I'd have a little bistro set outside on the balcony for eating at a table.

 

Still seems like a little much for a 1 BR - but there is nothing like this price in downtown or midtown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many, if not All condo associations have this rule. I am told it is a mortgage underwriting rule. I.e. Mortgages underwritten by Fanny, Freddie, whomever, need to have this requirement in place.

Condos have a "leasing permit" process. You apply with your HOA and if their are permits, you get issued one. You rent your place. If their are no permits, you technically can't. As permits are issued they will be valid for as long as the unit is leased and expire, say, if the unit is unleased for, say, 90 days. When the permit expires, it will go to anyone waiting in line and if you still want a permit, you go to the end of the line.... So permits are only good for a year or two.... Then they expire and go to the next in line.

I have owned 4 condos in my life and all of them have worked in something "kinda like" this process.

The restriction on the number of leased units is a Fannie/Freddie underwriting requirement. They want to ensure there will be a market for arm's length transactions in they acquire the property at foreclosure. The lender must also verify no one owner owns too many units, among a number of other requirements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^ Exactly. While I'm all for this development and hope that it works out, I just can't see someone paying $500k for an 800 SF unit when you can pay $450k for a 900 SF unit at the Marlowe in a far more desirable location. If there were units priced at $120k then you're point would be valid, but based on the prices we have seen so far, there are not going to be units priced that low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^ Exactly. While I'm all for this development and hope that it works out, I just can't see someone paying $500k for an 800 SF unit when you can pay $450k for a 900 SF unit at the Marlowe in a far more desirable location. If there were units priced at $120k then you're point would be valid, but based on the prices we have seen so far, there are not going to be units priced that low.

 

The cheapest units listed so far are $119,900

 

http://www.har.com/2604-leeland--1033/sale_53422989

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be a much better project if it were located in Uptown/Kirby/RO. I don't get wanting to live in a cardboard box in the bad part of town.

 

Well, yes, I suppose it would.  Just like my house would be better if it was in River Oaks.  But, just like my house would not be my house if it was in River Oaks, this project probably would not work with Uptown Kirby/RO land prices.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be a much better project if it were located in Uptown/Kirby/RO. I don't get wanting to live in a cardboard box in the bad part of town.

While Eado isn't Uptown or Kirby, I wouldn't go as far to say it's in a "bad part of town". Honestly, I wouldn't live in such a project no matter where it was located in Houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You call it a bad part of town, but it really isn't. at least not for what the people who will buy here are concerned with. As a hint, the people who will buy here couldn't care less about the school districts. I mean, the thought won't even cross their mind. They will think about how easy it is to hop on their bicycle and ride over to 8th wonder, or moon tower, or similar location. they probably won't even take grocery options into consideration. they'll consider how far they are from work, and how easy it is to reverse commute to wherever they need to go. they'll consider the less than a mile they have to walk/bike to get to any one of 3 different rail stops to be okay, and the closest one is .6 miles away on scott street and leeland. 

 

so yeah, the target audience doesn't want to live in the galleria area, kirby or RO. they want to live in areas exactly like this, which is the east end as of right now. and in 5-10 years when the area has grown up and becomes what montrose is now, they'll still want to be there because they will have grown with the area.

 

when they want to settle down and have a family, they'll have to sell and move on anyway (no matter the location). by that time, the area will more than likely be popular enough to sell one of these units for a tidy profit.

Edited by samagon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think it's a "bad part of town" ?

 

Looks terrible, roads are terrible, extremely sketchy, will take a long time to transition to something decent, if ever, etc. Townhouses over there are quite affordable, I don't understand why you wouldn't go that route vs this condo. If it were in a high land price area it would make a lot more sense since people would buy in to a smaller dwelling because it's the only way they can live in that area. This would be a nice addition to the River Oaks District area where the Arabella and Wilshire are going in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There actually aren't that many sub $300K houses left on the market over there, and a reminder - these have a starting price under $200K!  For some people, $200K is stretching it to consider buying anything anytime soon.  Having the low starting price is important, and can lead to savings when you compare mortgage + HOA to renting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are very few townhomes under 300k in the area. Most are going for $350k - $450k.

 

Not sure why one would classify the east end of downtown sketchy ....

It's definitely not River Oaks. Not the worst part of town though. I'd rather live there than somewhere down South I-45.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks terrible, roads are terrible, extremely sketchy, will take a long time to transition to something decent, if ever, etc. Townhouses over there are quite affordable, I don't understand why you wouldn't go that route vs this condo. If it were in a high land price area it would make a lot more sense since people would buy in to a smaller dwelling because it's the only way they can live in that area. This would be a nice addition to the River Oaks District area where the Arabella and Wilshire are going in.

 

the most affordable townhouse in East Downtown is a 240k townhome that's pending/continuing to show on HAR.

 

I assume you understand the difference between the monthly mortgage payment for 140k and 240k?

 

If you want to buy anything within 1 mile of downtown for under 150k, you can get into a converted garden apartment, but (outside of living closer to kirby and RO) you get all the same negatives (and more), and none of the positives. Think about it. No real sound insulation between you and your neighbors, no pools, no gated parking, you'll get a numbered parking space under a carport, hope you don't like sleeping in on saturdays, inevitably the property management will hire the lawn crew to come do all the maintenance on saturday morning (as an added bonus, it will seem like they are just standing next to your window running the equipment). You have a common area with a washer and dryer, not in units. just the kind of place you can afford to buy and be close to RO.

 

You could look at 3rd ward for houses under 150k, but considering what you think of east end, I'd hate to hear your commentary on that area. On top of that, you're not getting central AC/Heat, you're not getting a garage to park your car in, you get a yard that you have to maintain, or pay someone to maintain.

 

So no, you can't do what you're suggesting and be close to downtown on a first job out of college budget. as I said in my post earlier, the people who are the target audience want to live in an area like the east end, they do not want to live in RO, it's that simple.

 

but then again, there's a 31 flavors in RO, so that's something.

Edited by samagon
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the most affordable townhouse in East Downtown is a 240k townhome that's pending/continuing to show on HAR.

I assume you understand the difference between the monthly mortgage payment for 140k and 240k?

If you want to buy anything within 1 mile of downtown for under 150k, you can get into a converted garden apartment, but (outside of living closer to kirby and RO) you get all the same negatives (and more), and none of the positives. Think about it. No real sound insulation between you and your neighbors, no pools, no gated parking, you'll get a numbered parking space under a carport, hope you don't like sleeping in on saturdays, inevitably the property management will hire the lawn crew to come do all the maintenance on saturday morning (as an added bonus, it will seem like they are just standing next to your window running the equipment). You have a common area with a washer and dryer, not in units. just the kind of place you can afford to buy and be close to RO.

You could look at 3rd ward for houses under 150k, but considering what you think of east end, I'd hate to hear your commentary on that area. On top of that, you're not getting central AC/Heat, you're not getting a garage to park your car in, you get a yard that you have to maintain, or pay someone to maintain.

So no, you can't do what you're suggesting and be close to downtown on a first job out of college budget. as I said in my post earlier, the people who are the target audience want to live in an area like the east end, they do not want to live in RO, it's that simple.

but then again, there's a 31 flavors in RO, so that's something.

Lol I swear the maintenance man doesn't want me to sleep past 8 am on the weekends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the most affordable townhouse in East Downtown is a 240k townhome that's pending/continuing to show on HAR.

 

I assume you understand the difference between the monthly mortgage payment for 140k and 240k?

 

If you want to buy anything within 1 mile of downtown for under 150k, you can get into a converted garden apartment, but (outside of living closer to kirby and RO) you get all the same negatives (and more), and none of the positives. Think about it. No real sound insulation between you and your neighbors, no pools, no gated parking, you'll get a numbered parking space under a carport, hope you don't like sleeping in on saturdays, inevitably the property management will hire the lawn crew to come do all the maintenance on saturday morning (as an added bonus, it will seem like they are just standing next to your window running the equipment). You have a common area with a washer and dryer, not in units. just the kind of place you can afford to buy and be close to RO.

 

You could look at 3rd ward for houses under 150k, but considering what you think of east end, I'd hate to hear your commentary on that area. On top of that, you're not getting central AC/Heat, you're not getting a garage to park your car in, you get a yard that you have to maintain, or pay someone to maintain.

 

So no, you can't do what you're suggesting and be close to downtown on a first job out of college budget. as I said in my post earlier, the people who are the target audience want to live in an area like the east end, they do not want to live in RO, it's that simple.

 

but then again, there's a 31 flavors in RO, so that's something.

 

Well, one positive would be living in something larger than 350 sqft. 

I assume you understand the difference between 350 sqft and 1200 sqft? Buy the townhouse and rent a room out to a buddy to more than cover the difference in mortgages. 

Edited by AREJAY
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, one positive would be living in something larger than 350 sqft. 

I assume you understand the difference between 350 sqft and 1200 sqft? Buy the townhouse and rent a room out to a buddy to more than cover the difference in mortgages. 

 

a lender isn't going to accept 'room rental' as secondary income next to the 60k salary of someone straight out of college. (and that's generous considering the average starting salary for someone out of college is around $45k).

Edited by samagon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a lender isn't going to accept 'room rental' as secondary income next to the 60k salary of someone straight out of college. (and that's generous considering the average starting salary for someone out of college is around $45k).

Well, can't argue with that, you've got a point there. I was assuming that the prospective buyer would be able to afford, and get financing, for either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...