Twinsanity02 Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Someone please clear something up for me. I did biomed research for several years at UT Medical school at theTMC. There are numerous UT facilities throughout the med center, many conducting research. It looks very impressive but what is the purpose? How would this be integrated with the core of the TMC? Is it anywhere near the rail line? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LarryDierker Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Someone please clear something up for me. I did biomed research for several years at UT Medical school at theTMC. There are numerous UT facilities throughout the med center, many conducting research. It looks very impressive but what is the purpose? How would this be integrated with the core of the TMC? Is it anywhere near the rail line? The edge of the property is less than a mile from the rail line. there are now buses on this part of Bellfort and as was pointed out earlier the metro rail test line runs along the southern edge of the property and could in theory be utilized for the site. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LarryDierker Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 There's a homeless fort in the woods? Wouldn't that be a home...making them no longer homeless? http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/topic/31175-old-racetrack-off-of-buffalo-speedway/?p=510017 https://www.reddit.com/r/houston/comments/2r1mje/anyone_heard_of_bum_palace/ visible on google mapshttps://goo.gl/maps/ccpms2nMh6B2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinsanity02 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 So this is not the collaborative research facilities the TMC president calls TMC3? This is something completely different, correct? There is so much construction and planned construction in Houston it can make my head spin. Maybe it's the cold meds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLWM8609 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 They could extend the light rail there easily - I mean that is where the test track is...just saying Looks like the concept calls for the light rail to enter the campus via W. Bellfort, snaking down the west side of the campus before going down Holmes Rd along the UPRR ROW. The point on the rendering where the light rail goes down Holmes is further west than where the test track is. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinsanity02 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Cold Meds worn off. This is what I understand to be happening. The UT Research Campus is not part of the Texas Medical Center, but independent of it. Scientific research of all types will be conducted there as in any major university. The Texas Medical Center announced in September plans for a thirty acre development near OST and the bayou called TMC3. Then of course there is all the other projects with Texas Childrens and Hermann Memorial etc. Tough to keep up with all this. I feel for the folks in Dubai. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonIsHome Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 I like the idea of a growing education/research sector, don't like that it is 3.5 miles from TMC. What I like about TMC the most is the concentration of institutions plus it's proximity to 3 universities.So I am happy that UT is investing more in our city but would be happier if it was growing the TMC footprint. In the last 15 years the TMC had grown phenomenally in its own footprint and outside of it. What I am scared of is distract or sites. I may be thinking too much in into this but I am scared that satellite sites like this will diminish future growth around TMC. I know some may say that TMC will still be the it place for biomedical research in Houston and Texas, but many institutions already have little side operations across town, then UT builds this massive complex just south of TMC. Then A&M decides they want to expand but and decide that the UT project down the street is doing well, why expand in the congested TMC area when they can build a super campus in the Sharps town area? Then Baylor follows suit, and pretty much we have a still awesome TMC but most of the growth is spread out.I used to work in the medical center and the partnerships and sharing their is wonderful. I think Baylor with a regular University component would have been wonderful and Rice with a Med school and law School would have been serious competition for Duke as the best University in the South. A UH-UT partnership would have been awesome too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timoric Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 (edited) - Edited July 10, 2019 by Timoric 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonIsHome Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 I am thinking diversification and building any non-oil business opportunity is key since a crash grinds job creation to a halt in the this town - still in the hole for 2015 and the issue is in doubt if 2015 will see positive job growth at all, Houston is just under 3 million jobs and would be nice to make it over that big number for Christmas.Don't get me wrong, like I said is awesome that UT is investing more in Houston. I was just thinking it would be gravy if it was more connected to the TMC campus, then I went off on consolidation. Looks like consolidation is all the rage because of competition for NIH funding. UT, A&M and UH flagships are the 3 largest universities in Texas. All three are seeking to boost NIH funding and all 3 are seeking to add a med school component to the flagship. A&M is already seeking to merge with the system's Medical School. UT has medical schools in various cities but seeking to add one to its flagship. And UH is seeking to do the same thing. None of the 4 very high research universities in Texas have medical schools on their flagship. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanize713 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 (edited) UT is not seeking it is currently building. The medical was approved either last year or the year before I believe. It is actually quite impressive to drive down I-35 and see the massive scope of the project. There are like 4-5 cranes in a concentrated area building what seems like a small city. Here is a link to the plans: http://www.utexas.edu/campusplanning/masterplan/documents/MedicalDistrict20130509.pdf As far as this project, like some have said, glad to see the UT system putting more into Houston. I would also agree on wishing it was closer into the medical center or center of town. Edited November 6, 2015 by urbanize713 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinsanity02 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 I agree with HoustonIsHome. As much as I love living in the suburbs , I hope the TMC does not suburbanize. Have all those research institutes and medical facilities within walking distance is truly great. It creates an academic electricity to the area. I hope it stays that way. I have a feeling that this UT research facility will only be partially biomed so I do not see it as causing suburbanization of TMC. It is most likely going to be a sore spot for UH ambitions to become a top tier research university. Academic waters tend to be shark infested. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 So I am happy that UT is investing more in our city but would be happier if it was growing the TMC footprint. Is there a piece of land this size closer to TMC? I doubt UT was able to get what they wanted at a price they were willing to pay. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Is there a piece of land this size closer to TMC? I doubt UT was able to get what they wanted at a price they were willing to pay.For the price, probably not. But many would of rather seen this proposed for the Astroworld site.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobruss Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 I hate to sound negative but I do feel like U.of H.,is going to end up the loser again. Despite having a rough go getting funding from the state yet still managing to reach tier one status is now having to deal with UT and all their money and power they wield. We're already fighting an uphill battle to build a med school here which would work to help the third ward which is underserved. Legislators say U.of H., is going to face problems since they're spending so much on U. T.s new Med school and other regional med schools. Now UT is going to come in and poach professors, take research funds and students away from a University which has worked hard and stretched its meager hand outs from the state over the last 40 years to build a University that has always been here in Houston to serve this city. Like I've said here before we have to fight tooth and nail for every dollar we're given by the state and even though we don't receive a penny from the Permian basin fund like Texas and A&M we've built this University into a Tier One status with very little help from our state leaders. I understand the financial possibilities and everyone drooling about this new growth and opportunity but it sure doesn't help U of H. I know that UT alums could care less about what happens to U of H., but I don't like it. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 State Rep. Armando Walle is also concerned whether or not this will be a threat to U of H. http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/UT-sets-its-sights-on-Houston-6614101.php 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Is there a piece of land this size closer to TMC? I doubt UT was able to get what they wanted at a price they were willing to pay. Nothing even close to this size any closer to the TMC. Sheesh, people are acting like they're proposing this in Fulshear. It is just outside the loop and less than 2.5 miles from the southern point of the current TMC footprint. It does expand the TMC footprint, by 2.5-3 miles! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Yeah seems like a huge threat to UHs expansion ambitions. Kind of a bummer for UH but the UT plan seems good for the city.. Makes you wonder though why UT doesn't want in on the TMCi3 research collaborative campus right across the bayou from the TMC. Maybe they just need more space? This development is 300 acres.. I don't even think the double helix plot is that large, and would be shared with multiple other institutions to boot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swtsig Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Don't get me wrong, like I said is awesome that UT is investing more in Houston.I was just thinking it would be gravy if it was more connected to the TMC campus, then I went off on consolidation.Looks like consolidation is all the rage because of competition for NIH funding. UT, A&M and UH flagships are the 3 largest universities in Texas. All three are seeking to boost NIH funding and all 3 are seeking to add a med school component to the flagship. A&M is already seeking to merge with the system's Medical School. UT has medical schools in various cities but seeking to add one to its flagship. And UH is seeking to do the same thing.None of the 4 very high research universities in Texas have medical schools on their flagship. you're clinically insane if you think anyone can piece together anything close to 332 acres in the immediate vicinity of TMC. even at astronomical prices that would be hard to achieve. 3.5 miles away and within a stones throw of 610 ain't exactly the "suburbs" 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Yeah I just looked at that first image and it really gives perspective on how large this site is.. In retrospect to one of my previous comments, the Astroworld site was only around 100 acres before the rodeo bought half of it.. Props to UT for being able to get this large of a parcel so close to the inner city/so close to the TMC and hopefully with light rail access.For comparison, some other well know "large" parcels of land in the city..Hardy Yards - 45 acresKBR site - 135 acresThis site is over 3/4ths the size of Hermann Park.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avossos Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 UH don't give up. It makes too much sense. I support UHs efforts 100% 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeerNut Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 I wonder how much impact this will have on future advanced technology business locating in Houston over other Texas cities. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 What I don't quite get is UT is already in Houston. There's a medical school. A dental school. A school of public health. A nursing school. Some night/weekend MBA classes. How will a huge research campus affect these places? I imagine lots of shuttle busses running back and forth. As for UT and UH, the two have been working well together as of late on the academic side of things. I am assuming there will be a lot of collaboration between UT, UH, Rice, Baylor Med, TSU, UST, and UT Health. Just keep the damn aggies at bay... 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortune Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 People keep on bringing up TMC and TMC3, this project is not only limited to medical that is probably why they are not concerned with being closer to TMC or a part of TMC3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sellanious Caesar Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 So is this project and TMC3 project one in the same? Or are these 2 different projects altogether? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonIsHome Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 you're clinically insane if you think anyone can piece together anything close to 332 acres in the immediate vicinity of TMC. even at astronomical prices that would be hard to achieve.3.5 miles away and within a stones throw of 610 ain't exactly the "suburbs"There is no need to get nasty. First off, I never said it was suburban. All I said was that It would be gravy if it would be clustered in the Rice-TMC-TSU-UH concentration of Reseach.Furthermore, I never hinted at them finding a gargantuan property close to TMC, so why would I be insane? UT claims they are not building a regular campus (which I don't believe), according to them it's just research facilities so why would they need a campus. You do not need a track and field plot and other sports plots as pictured to build a research facilities, you do not need an Exxon style compound. You can easily go vertical as TMC and build research facilities that way closer in.I am not fooled by UT. For the 3rd time I am happy for the growth and investment but UT is being disingenuous. They have a huge presence in Houston but unlike every other major metropolitan area in Texas UT lacks a 4 year university here and that is what UT is building. Mark my words. UT sees the potential research $$$ they could be awarded by having a school in the largest city in the state with huge deficits in individuals skilled in the major economic sectors (medical, chemical engineering, structural engineering, and other O&G engineering).Nope, UT is building UTH! UTHSC, UTMB, and UTMDA are not really full fledged UT presences. UT has full campuses in Austin, San Antonio, El Paso, The Valley, multiple in DFW, but none here. Makes sense to build one in the fastest growing metro in the country. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 (edited) Actually I kind of agree with HIH about them possibly building a 4 year university.. I've always wondered why there is no full fledged "UT Houston" like practically every other large city in the state has. Yeah we have the UT med/health stuff, but doesn't DFW have a UT Southwestern med school, on top of UT Dallas and UT Arlington?The only thing I don't get is why not come out and just say it'll be UT Houston if that is the case? Outcry from UH? Harder to secure financing? Edited November 7, 2015 by cloud713 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
houstontexasjack Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 I'd be quite happy to see a full-fledged UTH. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonIsHome Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 Actually I kind of agree with HIH about them possibly building a 4 year university.. I've always wondered why there is no full fledged "UT Houston" like practically every other large city in the state has. Yeah we have the UT med/health stuff, but doesn't DFW have a UT Southwestern med school, on top of UT Dallas and UT Arlington?The only thing I don't get is why not come out and just say it'll be UT Houston if that is the case? Outcry from UH? Harder to secure financing?They are saying that they have been wanting a presence in Houston for decades, yet they have had a medical presence for 100 years. It doesn't follow. Plus that is a hell of a lot of land to start out with. The entire Rice Campus is 295 acres. Some of UT 4 yrs campuses are that size. UT Austin, Dallas, SA, etc are huge but they all started smaller and acquired more land. UTD started out as 1 building, UT Austin started out as 40 acres, UT Arlington was less than 10 Acres in its early days before expansion. Comparing it to other universities, SMU is exactly the same size as Rice at 295 acres, Houston Baptist is 100 acres, Texas state has 38,000 students on 450 acres, lamar is like 270 acres, trinity in SA is 117 acres.Looking at the medical Reseach fascilities, UT HSC Houston had a tiny foot print. UT HSC San Antonio has 8 campuses and all together they are smaller than this. UT Southwestern is in a Medical district that contain 3 campuses and 4 hospitals and and only take up 230 acres. So I can only think that the reason UT needs so much land is they are planning a full fledged 4 year stand alone college Campus in Houston. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GIS_Gordon Posted November 7, 2015 Share Posted November 7, 2015 (edited) Deleted - perhaps lets let the "residents" be. Edited January 20, 2016 by GIS_Gordon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmitch94 Posted November 8, 2015 Share Posted November 8, 2015 I know we are long past the era when universities were in it for the education and betterment of society but dose UT not make enough money as it is? I just find it disconcerting that all, not just UT, are in education solely for the money. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.