KinkaidAlum Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Patriot ActKyotoIraq invasionTortureKatrinaCoining the ativist judges term and then nominating activist judges with a litmus testExpansion of executive branch powers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
houstonmacbro Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I guess it started in Florida...Well damn. I guess it did start there but the Supreme Court kinda messed with things too so you can't totally fault Uncle Bush on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memebag Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 After 9/11, we had national unity and the world's support in ways we've never seen before. We could have done wonderful things with that. Bush pissed it away with a war that made no logical sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
houstonmacbro Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 After 9/11, we had national unity and the world's support in ways we've never seen before. We could have done wonderful things with that. Bush pissed it away with a war that made no logical sense.I think one thing that I really dislike about Bush (and this could be more of Karl Rove's legacy) is the divisiveness that has permeated not only politics, but otherwise rational Americans.You can see it here on this message board, at work, and elsewhere.We are no longer just Americans .. but we are right-wing, left-wing, progressive, gay, African America, etc. and we are all played one against the other. We no longer care about this country, only our hot-button issues. We don't think about what it's like to walk in someone's shoes, and we are more concerned with proving our point of view, as opposed to considering someone else's.This is a Bush-legacy that none of us should be proud of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I think one thing that I really dislike about Bush (and this could be more of Karl Rove's legacy) is the divisiveness that has permeated not only politics, but otherwise rational Americans.You can see it here on this message board, at work, and elsewhere.We are no longer just Americans .. but we are right-wing, left-wing, progressive, gay, African America, etc. and we are all played one against the other. We no longer care about this country, only our hot-button issues. We don't think about what it's like to walk in someone's shoes, and we are more concerned with proving our point of view, as opposed to considering someone else's.This is a Bush-legacy that none of us should be proud of.Don't kid yourself. Political and cultural partisanship is nothing new. It pre-dates our nation. George Washington talks about his fear that it will consume us as a society in the speech that he gives upon stepping down from office.One of the chronic things I dislike about Bush is actually that he comes off as a sort of insincere fratboy making the rounds within a crowd, patting everyone on the back, friends and enemies alike. The only people he's willing to come down on hard are external demons that he believes we can all unite to oppose. It was a workable strategy for a while (by chance), but ultimately everybody knows that he's insincere and he has no friends and can get nothing done because of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Don't kid yourself. Political and cultural partisanship is nothing new. It pre-dates our nation. George Washington talks about his fear that it will consume us as a society in the speech that he gives upon stepping down from office.One of the chronic things I dislike about Bush is actually that he comes off as a sort of insincere fratboy making the rounds within a crowd, patting everyone on the back, friends and enemies alike. The only people he's willing to come down on hard are external demons that he believes we can all unite to oppose. It was a workable strategy for a while (by chance), but ultimately everybody knows that he's insincere and he has no friends and can get nothing done because of it.Agree.Because Bush politicized virtually ever segment of the government, including completely previously non-political subdivisions such as FEMA, there is virtually nothing about Bush that I liked. I will give him credit for his failed attempt at immigration reform, as he actually acknowledged the benefits of immigration, while also confronting the failed aspects of current policy. Ultimately, demagogues within his own party doomed his plan to failure. Kinda sad that the one thing I thought Bush did correctly was a failed iniative.Ultimately, I believe Bush's most damaging act was the politicizing of the Justice Department. Nothing Bush has done has more damaged the civil liberties of Americans than this, though it receives comparatively little press. He attacked the Constitutional rights of Americans in so many ways. Alberto Gonzles should have his law license revoked for being an enemy combatant of the Constitution. Hundreds of competent and intelligent Justice Department employees were run off and replaced with uneducated partisan hacks.The damage is incredibly long term, as Justice has forever lost its most knowledgeable and proficient lawyers, and is now saddled with incompetent employees...ironically, the very type of bureaucrat Republicans most hate. If the new president, whoever it may be, will at least restore some of the independence of Justice, I can almost tolerate some of the other policies. Bad foreign policy may create many enemies of the US, but a bad Justice Department makes our own government the enemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barracuda Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 In addition to handing out positions based on partisan loyalty rather than competency and expertise, I'm bothered by his tendency to reward and congratulate those in his administration when they fail miserably. For example, saying to FEMA Chief Michael Brown "heck of a job, Brownie!" as the city of New Orleans literally drowned during Katrina. Or maybe the parting words from his loyal Bushies to former Attorney General Alberto Gonazles. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/14/gonzales-farewell/. There are many, many more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westguy76 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 (edited) I don't like his dog!his dog is cool!!!have you ever seen the video of him fishing with his dog on the boat?It's probably on youtube, going to look now..couldn't find it, anyways it seems his dog has died.So you are all free up to change your mind on his legacy. Edited September 5, 2008 by westguy76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 his dog is cool!!!have you ever seen the viseo of him fishing with his dog on the boat? It's probably on youtube, going to look now.. "As an expert on this matter, I think Barney is a douchebag." - Valentina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crunchtastic Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Ultimately, I believe Bush's most damaging act was the politicizing of the Justice Department. Nothing Bush has done has more damaged the civil liberties of Americans than this, though it receives comparatively little press. He attacked the Constitutional rights of Americans in so many ways. Alberto Gonzles should have his law license revoked for being an enemy combatant of the Constitution. Hundreds of competent and intelligent Justice Department employees were run off and replaced with uneducated partisan hacks. yes, yes and yes. I do not blame Bush for economics, but I do blame him for this. But no one seems to care. "As an expert on this matter, I think Barney is a douchebag." - Valentina Is that your dog? Good girl!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Is that your dog? Good girl!!Yeah.And even though it appears that she may be reading off a teleprompter, I can assure you that her opinions were not written by a speechwriter, but are entirely her own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
august948 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Pardoning his buddy Scooter Libby and refusing to pardon Ramos and Compean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinite_jim Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to becharged to provisions against danger real or pretended from abroad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoolBuddy06 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I consolidated my first 2 semester loans at 3.345%. The rest at 6.8%. I had to keep transfering what I can to 0% credit cards every year. C'mon when your car and home loan rates are lower than Stafford loan, we have a problem.That's my biggest bif with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Native Son Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 his dog is cool!!!have you ever seen the video of him fishing with his dog on the boat?It's probably on youtube, going to look now..couldn't find it, anyways it seems his dog has died.So you are all free up to change your mind on his legacy.I was talking about his pit bulls, rove and cheney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westguy76 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 (edited) This is worse than I thought it would be, come on sheeple. Some of you really need to educate yourself. Because whatever blog you are reading or what your friends are telling you is not working.Your credit card rate is to high and it's the presidents fault. He mishandled hurricane response. Hello how about holding the mayor, govenor, fema director responsible?"I guess it started in florida".. I don't even know what this means but I can guess. Oh it was his fault the local gov. had problems with the punch cards and voting process, or it was his fault Al Gore couldn't conceed and held the country in an embarrissing halt taking the hanging chads to court?Got a few reasonable responses here (like I don't like his dog), keep them coming. Edited September 5, 2008 by westguy76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark F. Barnes Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 His Dance moves suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Native Son Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 This is worse than I thought it would be, come on sheeple. Some of you really need to educate yourself. Because whatever blog you are reading or what your friends are telling you is not working.Your credit card rate is to high and it's the presidents fault. He mishandled hurricane response. Hello how about holding the mayor, govenor, fema director responsible?"I guess it started in florida".. I don't even know what this means but I can guess. Oh it was his fault the local gov. had problems with the punch cards and voting process, or it was his fault Al Gore couldn't conceed and held the country in an embarrissing halt taking the hanging chads to court?Got a few reasonable responses here (like I don't like his dog), keep them coming.you are sooo right! if we all just watched Fox News and paid attention to Rush we would know how right you are! you don't want discourse, you want agreement..now please pardon me and my dissenting opinion.... good luck, and don't forget to vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 His Dance moves suckThat should provoke bi-partisan agreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westguy76 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 you are sooo right! if we all just watched Fox News and paid attention to Rush we would know how right you are! you don't want discourse, you want agreement..now please pardon me and my dissenting opinion.... good luck, and don't forget to voteNo I don't want agreement, just more sensable logical answers. there are some here but try to defend the ones I just listed as ridiculous, go ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Native Son Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 No I don't want agreement, just more sensable logical answers. there are some here but try to defend the ones I just listed as ridiculous, go ahead.point taken...I won't defend anyone's position...I am simply grateful that I can still express my own opinion freely, and seriously, don't forget to vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wernicke Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I think it would be much easier to list the things that Bush has done well... But I personally can't think of anything that his administration has handled well. We are far worse-off than we were 8 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vertigo58 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 His redneck and good old boy swagger. Too much of a southern draw. Seems a bit trite and unimportant but non-southern people dont take well to it. Now, lets all turn to the next page students. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toggle3 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 You'll have to excuse me, I slipped into a Socialist State today and bumped my head.Oh, and props to Sarahiki for seeing past the talk radio buzz calling this a handout to irresponsible individuals.Facetiousness, right? You really can't be serious when you take the stance that socialism is an innoucuous bit of political difference. You know (on some level don't you) how very lucky you are to be living in a democracy and not living in a socialist state? You haven't lost your understanding that socialism deprives people of freedom and that loss of freedom is a bad thing? It's one thing to bash Bush or conservative ideaology in general but don't be too glib as to dismis socialism as just another acceptable political position. Socialism cannot ever be ethically presented as acceptable; it's on the list of political idealogies containing marxism, nazism, and totalitarianism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Facetiousness, right? You really can't be serious when you take the stance that socialism is an innoucuous bit of political difference. You know (on some level don't you) how very lucky you are to be living in a democracy and not living in a socialist state? You haven't lost your understanding that socialism deprives people of freedom and that loss of freedom is a bad thing? It's one thing to bash Bush or conservative ideaology in general but don't be too glib as to dismis socialism as just another acceptable political position. Socialism cannot ever be ethically presented as acceptable; it's on the list of political idealogies containing marxism, nazism, and totalitarianism.You know (on some level don't you) that we do not live in a democracy? Just thought I'd point that out, since it seems to be central to your argument.kthxbye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disastro Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 (edited) I heard Obama try to quantify today his problem with the Bush administration today. He said something along the lines of 8 years of failed economic and foreign policy when going into his spill about change...four more years of the same...yadayadaI personally think this is revisionist history. What do you think? What has been your problem with the Bush administration regarding the job he has done.I don't want to hear about your philosophical differances. We all have them. I want to hear about his supposed failed policies.Of our or your current state of affairs, what do you attribute as being the administrations fault?I'll say as a republican voter that I have been dissapointed with his weak stance on illegal immigration. However, I understand this is politics and things like this hot button issue will likely never change not in the abrupt sudden way I suppose there is too much at stake in this case.1. Failure to order the release of border agents/political prisoners Ramos and Campean2. A perceived sense of Bush Administration corruption (sellout) with Mexico due to #1, #3, and #43. Marines FALSELY accused in Falluja and his COMPLETE lack of support as Commander In Chief. Outrageous!!!!!!4. Support of globalist policies/North American Union5. Failure to secure the borders after 9/116. Failure to direct the military to use tactical nuclear weapons to end the War on Terror quickly (and thus serving notice to ALL enemies of the US at the same time) and decisively in Iraq, Afghanistan and the badlands of Pakistan7. The attempt to force the Dubai Ports deal on the US8. Selling out conservative principles and turning into, basically, a fiscal liberal. I thought I voted twice for a conservative...what a fool I was.9. $700 Billion Wall Street bailout.These are the immediate problems I have with Bush. Edited October 15, 2008 by Disastro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westguy76 Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 (edited) now that is a better response, can't seem to get one from someone who votes democrat.How can the canditates and pundits keep talking about how the Bush adminstration has run up the national deficit to record numbers and fail to mention the cause? THE WAR against terror that we were thrust into soon after the Bush administration took office. Now let me stop you if you disagree with the war in Iraq, because I know a lot of people do. Didn't we go there on principal, didn't we go their to impose UN sanctions and remove what we believed to be weapons of mass destruction, didn't we go their as a natural extention of the war on terror to protect americas people and are allies? The answer is yes before you try to spin it. So isn't national defense after being attacked on our own soil a valid excuse. Don't we all remember the first years of the war hearing the astronimical amounts of dollars that were being spent every month on bunker buster boms and troops and weapons and transport? Why did the media stop talking about this? political... I understand if the war did not go as smoothly as we could hope, we found no stockpiles, didn't get out as we wanted, etc. but Isn't the war a big chunk of the spending that Bush did? Isn't it justifiable based on our fears and defense, isn't freedom worth the price? and finally why are we blaming all this on one administration who took action with the authorization of congress and the support of the american people, and why are we crying for change? I'm a nutjob, apparently Edited October 15, 2008 by westguy76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
west20th Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 (edited) now that is a better response, can't seem to get one from someone who votes democrat.How can the canditates and pundits keep talking about how the Bush adminstration has run up the national deficit to record numbers and fail to mention the cause? THE WAR against terror that we were thrust into soon after the Bush administration took office. Now let me stop you if you disagree with the war in Iraq, because I know a lot of people do. Didn't we go there on principal, didn't we go their to impose UN sanctions and remove what we believed to be weapons of mass destruction, didn't we go their as a natural extention of the war on terror to protect americas people and are allies? The answer is yes before you try to spin it. So isn't national defense after being attacked on our own soil a valid excuse. Don't we all remember the first years of the war hearing the astronimical amounts of dollars that were being spent every month on bunker buster boms and troops and weapons and transport? Why did the media stop talking about this? political... I understand if the war did not go as smoothly as we could hope, we found no stockpiles, didn't get out as we wanted, etc. but Isn't the war a big chunk of the spending that Bush did? Isn't it justifiable based on our fears and defense, isn't freedom worth the price? and finally why are we blaming all this on one administration who took action with the authorization of congress and the support of the american people, and why are we crying for change? I'm a nutjob, apparentlyBush took a 128Billion dollar surplus and turned it into a 400+billion dollar deficit. The 400 billion does not include the supplementals to fund the Irag war. It is beyond me how you can continue to justify this man's incompetence. Edited October 15, 2008 by west20th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disastro Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 now that is a better response, can't seem to get one from someone who votes democrat.That's because only two thought processes go through the brain (?) of a Democrat -- 1. "I hate Bush. Anybody but Bush" and 2. "Hope and Change". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N Judah Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 (edited) USA looked great on paper but nobody actually *built* anything. Financial "products" (ie math equations in a zero-sum framework) don't count. Edited October 17, 2008 by N Judah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts