Jump to content

METRORail North Line


Trae

Recommended Posts

There are many ways to connect a light rail line to the airport.  You could have a central station with any of the following options: a shuttle bus connecting terminals to the rail station (Boston, LA are cities that I know have this), you could construct a people mover (my vote would be for us to somehow extend the underground people mover to the rail station since it is already outside of the sterile zone, the underground people mover would most likely have to be reconstructed as well), or you could have elevated walkways from the station to the terminals. 

 

A more expensive and probably not viable option would be to construct a station at each of the terminals, but you'd have to reconfigure the terminals and it would cost a lot. 

 

The original 2003 referendum had light rail going to IAH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 507
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Houston's North Rail Line will open for service on Dec. 21, 2013, according to Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County officials addressing a luncheon held by the Greater Houston Partnership Tuesday, Oct. 22.

 

The $756 million, 5.3-mile light rail transit extension will link MetroRail's University of Houston Downtown Station, one current LRT terminus, with Northline Commons via Main Street and Fulton Street, and is the first addition to Houston's initial 7.5-mile, LRT segment, which opened in January 2004.

 

MetroRail officials earlier this year targeted an opening date for the line prior to Christmas. 

 

Two other LRT routes, the East Line and Southeast Line, currently are scheduled to begin operations next year.

 

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/passenger/light-rail/houston-north-rail-line-to-open-dec-21.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Great news!

 

Glad to see you noticed that, similar to the cities you routinely tout as models, Houston is expanding its rail too.  ;-)

 

It's admirable that Houston's new lines are going into low income areas. Many times such projects go into flashy areas for developers to jump on, which is good, but doesn't help the people that need this kind of infrastructure the most. I think part of this is that these neighborhoods aren't morons like Afton Oaks that protest against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that a street has to be rebuilt by the rail authority is ridiculous. And adds a lot to the cost unnecessarily.

So, if they tear up your yard to repair a sewer line (taking out a tree or two?), you should shoulder the cost of fixing the damage done? You sure you want to go with that, or do you want to rethink that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if they tear up your yard to repair a sewer line (taking out a tree or two?), you should shoulder the cost of fixing the damage done? You sure you want to go with that, or do you want to rethink that?

The reason these rules were put in place initially were to put houston electric's streetcar out of business. And it worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason these rules were put in place initially were to put houston electric's streetcar out of business. And it worked.

I'm going to guess that this has much more to do with standard project management methodology. You generally want to have one group that's responsible for the success of the full project. If you make one group responsible for the rail and another responsible for the street work, you're raising your risk and the difficulty of coordination. Both teams have timelines and deliverables that need to be coordinated.

Sorry that doesn't sound as sexy as a massive conspiracy to undermine rail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like light rail, too, as others on this board do too, but remember, it's like person A saying "I don't like Republicans" and person B saying "Every Republican in the neighborhood needs to be rounded up and shot". Same idea, but it's what separates citizens from criminal lunatics.

 

And Slick, you never answered my question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to guess that this has much more to do with standard project management methodology. You generally want to have one group that's responsible for the success of the full project. If you make one group responsible for the rail and another responsible for the street work, you're raising your risk and the difficulty of coordination. Both teams have timelines and deliverables that need to be coordinated.

Sorry that doesn't sound as sexy as a massive conspiracy to undermine rail.

No. I suggest you read houston electric by Steve baron to read about the history.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that a street has to be rebuilt by the rail authority is ridiculous. And adds a lot to the cost unnecessarily.

 

So, you advocate building rail without moving the utilities, repairing the sidewalks rail construction destroys, etc? That makes sense, let's just leave the utilities under the rail, so when repair is needed, the rail line gets torn up. Actually, that's a great idea, lets tear out the rail and improve mobility back to where it was before these stupid projects started destroying the ability of people to move around the city (it is a giant pain to get past the rail on North Main/Fulton if you are headed East or West).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you advocate building rail without moving the utilities, repairing the sidewalks rail construction destroys, etc? That makes sense, let's just leave the utilities under the rail, so when repair is needed, the rail line gets torn up. Actually, that's a great idea, lets tear out the rail and improve mobility back to where it was before these stupid projects started destroying the ability of people to move around the city (it is a giant pain to get past the rail on North Main/Fulton if you are headed East or West).

That's not what I said. I said Metro shouldn't be financially responsible for rebuilding a street or sidewalks for that matter.

Also riding a train will be much smoother than a bus for people in the north line area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not what I said. I said Metro shouldn't be financially responsible for rebuilding a street or sidewalks for that matter.

Also riding a train will be much smoother than a bus for people in the north line area.

 

They're only responsible for building the streets they themselves took apart. If I damage my neighbor's sidewalk then I owe him to fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's admirable that Houston's new lines are going into low income areas. Many times such projects go into flashy areas for developers to jump on, which is good, but doesn't help the people that need this kind of infrastructure the most. I think part of this is that these neighborhoods aren't morons like Afton Oaks that protest against it.

 

Was that altruism on METRO's part of just because it's cheaper and gets less flack from the neighborhoood (plus being good for the developers who can get adjoining land cheaper)?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's admirable that Houston's new lines are going into low income areas. Many times such projects go into flashy areas for developers to jump on, which is good, but doesn't help the people that need this kind of infrastructure the most. I think part of this is that these neighborhoods aren't morons like Afton Oaks that protest against it.

 

Was that altruism on METRO's part of just because it's cheaper and gets less flack from the neighborhoood (plus being good for the developers who can get adjoining land cheaper)?

 

Government funding has strings attached. I think one was regarding existing utilized bus routes. It would stand to reason the low income areas nearest downtown, users of mass transit, would fit the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was that altruism on METRO's part of just because it's cheaper and gets less flack from the neighborhoood (plus being good for the developers who can get adjoining land cheaper)?

A smart neighborhood which realizes the value of being close to a rail line unlike afton oaks who fought tooth and nail to avoid it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Government funding has strings attached. I think one was regarding existing utilized bus routes. It would stand to reason the low income areas nearest downtown, users of mass transit, would fit the bill.

 

It's going to be really interesting to see what the impact on bus service is going to be.  Is this designed to augment existing bus routes or is it designed to replace them?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be really interesting to see what the impact on bus service is going to be.  Is this designed to augment existing bus routes or is it designed to replace them?

 

 

Never mind.  Answered my own question.  The number 15 bus route will be discontinued because it duplicates the route of the North line.  The current average workday ridership of the number 15 route is 2,281 and it saw a 10.3% increase in ridership over the last 12 months.  I would argue that any consideration of ridership numbers for the North line should consider that amount as a shift in existing transit ridership rather than an increase.

 

The projected ridership at opening is 17,400 average weekday boardings which would be a net increase of approx. 15,000.  Interested to see the actual numbers.

 

http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/TX_Houston_North_Corridor_LRT_complete_profile.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never mind.  Answered my own question.  The number 15 bus route will be discontinued because it duplicates the route of the North line.  The current average workday ridership of the number 15 route is 2,281 and it saw a 10.3% increase in ridership over the last 12 months.  I would argue that any consideration of ridership numbers for the North line should consider that amount as a shift in existing transit ridership rather than an increase.

 

The projected ridership at opening is 17,400 average weekday boardings which would be a net increase of approx. 15,000.  Interested to see the actual numbers.

 

http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/TX_Houston_North_Corridor_LRT_complete_profile.pdf

 

I'm curious how they came to an average of 17,400 weekday bordings when the current bus route has 2,281.  Does that represent changed bus routes to force riders onto the rail line?  Is some of it people already on the existing line, just continuing on to destinations on the new segment?  Or did they pull it out of their posterior?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious how they came to an average of 17,400 weekday bordings when the current bus route has 2,281.  Does that represent changed bus routes to force riders onto the rail line?  Is some of it people already on the existing line, just continuing on to destinations on the new segment?  Or did they pull it out of their posterior?

 

 

Don't know what kind of science went into those numbers.  It'll be fun to watch the actual numbers when they come in though and see what the impact is on impacted bus lines.  (Yes, I realize that qualifies me as a nerd to say that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


All of the HAIF
None of the ads!
HAIF+
Just
$5!


×
×
  • Create New...