j_cuevas713 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 38 minutes ago, Houston19514 said: . Another example of how parking minimums are not the evil they are made out to be here on HAIF. I hope someone will point out the first significant development that provides less parking than they would have been required to provide under the previous regulations. Downtown has not had minimum parking requirements for many years, and yet, every hotel, apartment building, condo, and office building has provided parking; in all cases I'm aware, every bit as generously as the regulations would have required. That's why it's called "market based parking." If the market determines it makes sense to have it, that's at the discretion of the developer. Making it a mandate is the issue. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
004n063 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 6 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said: That's why it's called "market based parking." If the market determines it makes sense to have it, that's at the discretion of the developer. Making it a mandate is the issue. I think a more precise argument would be that removing parking requirements will not automatically - and certainly not quickly - reduce the present demand for parking, so parking will continue to be built, which will do a pretty good job of preserving that demand, ergo the amount of parking. But the mandate skips the market middleman and preserves the parking excess all on its own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_cuevas713 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 hours ago, 004n063 said: I think a more precise argument would be that removing parking requirements will not automatically - and certainly not quickly - reduce the present demand for parking, so parking will continue to be built, which will do a pretty good job of preserving that demand, ergo the amount of parking. But the mandate skips the market middleman and preserves the parking excess all on its own. For Houston, yes we'll probably have a ton of parking garages built before the city starts to lose some car dependency. But we're seeing some benefit to not having minimums with some projects where developers would have been required to create an excessive amount of parking but instead built only what they felt was necessary for their project. EaDough is a great example along with the Union East development. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hindesky Posted February 2 Author Share Posted February 2 All the material and the construction trailers have been removed from the laydown yard. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
__nevii Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 On 1/26/2024 at 12:57 PM, Houston19514 said: Another example of how parking minimums are not the evil they are made out to be here on HAIF. I hope someone will point out the first significant development that provides less parking than they would have been required to provide under the previous regulations. Downtown has not had minimum parking requirements for many years, and yet, every hotel, apartment building, condo, and office building has provided parking; in all cases I'm aware, every bit as generously as the regulations would have required. Actually, in a way, what you wrote would simply be more evidence that the minimums are useless (and, hence, should be removed). As your examples show, developers clearly can still include parking with their constructs even in the absence of minimums. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hindesky Posted February 9 Author Popular Post Share Posted February 9 Broadstone Eado has a sign on the north building. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JClark54 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanjorade Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 3 hours ago, hindesky said: Broadstone Eado has a sign on the north building. That’s one ugly sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hindesky Posted February 21 Author Share Posted February 21 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hindesky Posted March 6 Author Popular Post Share Posted March 6 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CREguy13 Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 While I like the added density for Eado, this looks like cheap student housing imo. I don't understand the facade's mix of materials Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cspwal Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Is the facade done yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hindesky Posted March 8 Author Share Posted March 8 https://livebroadstoneeado.com 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.