Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just taken an interest in Rice University. Has there ever been any year(s) that it won any championship? The only pro football player who comes to my mind who attended Rice was Tommy Kramer. When I attended the University of Arkansas from 1984-86, I remember that Rice University was in the same conference.

Edit: 

1891: The William M. Rice Institute for the Advancement of Literature, Science and Art filed its state charter in the Texas capital May 19, 1891.

1912: The Rice Institute.

1960: William Marsh Rice University on July 1, 1960.

Present day, in short, Rice University.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from http://riceowls.collegesports.com/faciliti...ce-stadium.html

The Stadium has a storied history, borne from the University's football tradition. Fifty-three years ago, Rice fielded one of its greatest teams. The 1949 Owls, led by all-Americas Froggy Williams and Joe Watson, won the Southwest Conference championship and the 1950 Cotton Bowl with a 10-1 record. The Owls posted an 8-4 overall record, their best record since 1950. In that span, Rice was 5-0 at home.

However, old Rice Stadium (now the Rice Track/Soccer Stadium) seated less than 37,000 fans. Houston's civic leaders decided the old structure was not a proper venue for the SWC champions, much less a city with a future so bright. The idea for the new Rice Stadium was born.

Rice Stadium was also the site for JFK's famous moon speech.

http://vesuvius.jsc.nasa.gov/er/seh/ricetalk.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that why the stadium is so big?

It's kind of funny it's so big but they never fill it up.

It is so big because it was built in 1949 to handle overflow crowds watching the Southwest Conference champion Rice Owls. It was a construction marvel, being designed and built in only 9 months.

Here's a good link on the stadium.

http://www.sfo.com/~csuppes/NCAA/WAC/index...?Rice/index.htm

EDIT: Sorry, nmainguy. You beat me to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rice's football isn't going to go away. Rice U has more than enough $$$ to make sure that never happens; we're talking about the school that used to own Yankee Stadium.

All that being said, they're not a great team. More often than not they're an average-to-bad team. Now if they'd stop beating my alma mater, UH, everything in this world would be A-OK. :lol:

Go Coogs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is so big because it was built in 1949 to handle overflow crowds watching the Southwest Conference champion Rice Owls.  It was a construction marvel, being designed and built in only 9 months.

Here's a good link on the stadium.

http://www.sfo.com/~csuppes/NCAA/WAC/index...?Rice/index.htm

EDIT:  Sorry, nmainguy.  You beat me to it.

No problem, Red...I seem to remember all the money was raised by some local Houston socialites who couldn't bear to have to share a stadium with those common Cougars :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rice athletes' grade point averages tend to be some of the highest among college athletes accross the country.

Which is why they arent very good.

All the really good players (regardless of how smart they are) would rather play at a place they can atleast attempt to pass without much worry, Rice is a tough school and hence atheletes dont want to play there unless thats what is important to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, LSU's baseball team usually is full of 3.0 and 3.5 students. Some higher, and many of them aren't in a general studies course to be qualified as a college student.

People who put a lot into there school work can still be athletes, just as long as they can handle both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you saying exactly?  Most people still have to be very smart to get into rice.

That's exactly what I'm saying. Rice University must have always been known for smart students. That's all that I know about that university. I graduated from Arkansas State with a 2.26 GPA, which means that I wouldn't have stood a chance of getting to go to Rice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I'm saying.  Rice University must have always been known for smart students.  That's all that I know about that university.  I graduated from Arkansas State with a 2.26 GPA, which means that I wouldn't have stood a chance of getting to go to Rice.

Has Rice University ever played in the Cotton Bowl or in any other bowl game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, I think Rice and other "elite" schools would be better off if they left their current NCAA conferences and formed their own. Schools like Baylor, Vanderbilt, et al, just can't compete with the likes of OU, Texas, Tennessee, Auburn, etc.

If the "academically-gifted athletic schools" would create their own conference (consisting of, say, SMU, Vanderbilt, Baylor, Rice, Tulane, et al), the games would probably be pretty competitive.

Then again, now that I think about it, I'm not sure there are even 8 qualified Division I schools out there that could justify creating a new conference! I mean, what other "smart" D-I schools located in the SE quadrant of the US have a football team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of those small schools find ways to compete. Baylor for example has great baseball, tennis, and women's basketball. They are only weak in football and men's basketball. They are weak in basketball because of the recent scandal and subsequent sanctions to their program.

As far as these schools being "too smart" to compete they obviously can by Duke and Rice's example.

On another topic schools such as UT and A&M consistently rank ahead of SMU and Baylor in academic surveys. A school's committment to academics has nothing to do with their committment to athletics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, I think Rice and other "elite" schools would be better off if they left their current NCAA conferences and formed their own.  Schools like Baylor, Vanderbilt, et al, just can't compete with the likes of OU, Texas, Tennessee, Auburn, etc. 

If the "academically-gifted athletic schools" would create their own conference (consisting of, say, SMU, Vanderbilt, Baylor, Rice, Tulane, et al), the games would probably be pretty competitive. 

Then again, now that I think about it, I'm not sure there are even 8 qualified Division I schools out there that could justify creating a new conference!  I mean, what other "smart" D-I schools located in the SE quadrant of the US have a football team?

How about TCU, SMU, Rice, Baylor, Tulane, Vandy, Duke and Miami? Of course, Duke and Miami would never leave the ACC, and Baylor wouldn't leave the Big 12 unless they kicked them out for Arkansas, and Vandy would never leave the SEC, but there's 8 small, academically talented schools for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There still is the possiblity of Rice axing football in the future.  It wasn't about Rice having enough money for football.  It was about whether there's a need for it at such a very small university, and it's lack of a great number of fans.

Everything I have heard on this subject concerns moving the football program to a different division so they can compete with similar size schools. Right now they are Division 1. By moving to Division 1aa, 2, or 3 they could compete better than they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside, I think Rice and other "elite" schools would be better off if they left their current NCAA conferences and formed their own.  Schools like Baylor, Vanderbilt, et al, just can't compete with the likes of OU, Texas, Tennessee, Auburn, etc. 

If the "academically-gifted athletic schools" would create their own conference (consisting of, say, SMU, Vanderbilt, Baylor, Rice, Tulane, et al), the games would probably be pretty competitive. 

Then again, now that I think about it, I'm not sure there are even 8 qualified Division I schools out there that could justify creating a new conference!  I mean, what other "smart" D-I schools located in the SE quadrant of the US have a football team?

When I was in college, I was talking to a professor who attended Cornell. I asked him why Ivy League universities didn't have bowl games. He said that it was because it interfered with academics.

Do you think that Rice University would qualify as Ivy League? Then it would play only Harvard, Yale, Brown, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Stanford fields a good football program, and they aren't exactly an average school. In fact, Stanford always wins out that award for most outstanding overall athletic program in the nation beating out UT Austin. So being smart isn't exclusive to having a good athletic program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was in article in the paper this weekend (still tryin to find it) about Rice football. Rice is playing schools like UCLA and Texas because they get $500,000 to lose. And that $500,000 may soon be going up to $800,000. Next year Rice will even play Florida State. These games are being played in an effort to have the football program pay for itself, and make some money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was in article in the paper this weekend (still tryin to find it) about Rice football.  Rice is playing schools like UCLA and Texas because they get $500,000 to lose.  And that $500,000 may soon be going up to $800,000.  Next year Rice will even play Florida State.  These games are being played in an effort to have the football program pay for itself, and make some money.

This sort of deal has been going around for years. Why else do you think schools like Louisiana-Lafayette and the like play Texas? They do it (i) for the money, (ii) because Texas et al type schools need other "gimme" schools they can practice on early in the season, and (iii) if the "weak" schools can pull off an upset, or close to it, doing so instantly increases their profile for the year. Cases in point: University of Central Florida and Fresno State. They became "semi-famous" football schools by taking on the big guys and giving them a run for their money, no pun intended.

Also, at virtually every big school that has a football program, football is what keeps the school's entire athletic program profitable. For athletic programs to be successful financially, the key is to always have a profitable football program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...