mfastx Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 The lights are largely off at 4 am. Late workers and cleaning crews will keep them on until midnite or so, but once people are gone, the buildings go dark. I suppose those who have never had to keep a budget may complain that they want lights for their amusement, but building owners trying to keep tenants in the building must deal with real life issues, such as common area fees. Since forum posters do not pay the bills, it is easy to see why their pleas fall on deaf ears.Now, an owner with an empty building might look at it differently. Building owners in Miami, Atlanta and Dallas, where vacancy rates are far higher, may add some lights in an effort to lure a new tenant. It may work for some. But, having rented a few offices in my day, I can safely say that not once have I ever made a choice on a building's lighting scheme. In fact, none of my offices were ever lit at night.I honestly think the building owners can afford to keep ample lighting on, as evidenced by the pre-Ike lighting schemes. I think Hurricane Ike destroyed some lighting, and the issue is just that the owners don't want to spend the time to fix it. I just would like the city to look nice, is that such a bad thing to ask? And I guess these "real life issues" occur only in Houston? Please post a picture of a major city that has no building lighting, such as our own? Because I can't seem to find such a picture, I'm sure there's one though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 Can you substantiate that hypothesis at all? It seems far-fetched. Wells Fargo Bank Plaza used to have a greenish light surrounding the top, but after Hurricane Ike, the greenish light was only on a small section of the top. I'm not sure if that small section is still on today however, but it was obvious something happenend to it. Compare these two pics: The first picture was taken before Ike, the second after. In the second one, you can see a small strip of the greenish lighting above the Wells Fargo Bank Plaza still illuminated, of course later they turned it off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I posted several in another post complaining about lighting. Perhaps you can search for it. It was quite illuminating. While you are searching, look for articles about the lending crisis for commercial buildings. You'll find that buildings owners don't have as much cash as you think. 'Pre-Ike' is also known as 'pre-recession' in financial circles. I did a search on downtown lighting, and I'm not about to go through the hundreds of pages of threads to find a few of your pictures. And sorry, I just can't take your word for it, either. The darkest downtown I've seen in any other big city at this time is San Diego, but they have company lighting on almost all of their buildings, to be honest I don't think downtown's lack of lighting is due to the recession, it' just that I think that the owners don't give a shit about lighting. Sure downtown lighting doesn't matter, blah, blah, blah but I'm sure you'll find that many people think downtown Houston is boring at night, and why not light it up to make it less boring? The top 5 cities in the US's downtown lighting: Now you would think that since Houston has supposedly fared better than others during the reccesion, they wouldn't be so broke as to not afford lighting. So I just can't see how that is the case. I think it is simply the "I don't care how my building looks, I just want to make as much money possible" attitude, which is fine, but is doesn't make the city any better IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highway6 Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 i actually do recall a chron article about hurricane damage taking out several buildings exterior lights.... could have been Ike. That being said... Ike may have taken some out, but it seems more likely the recession is keeping them out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20thStDad Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 300' Oil derrick with 50' Jeff Bagwell at the top and the retired shuttle Discovery mounted on to the side..... all bronzed.... Yes. Before I even got to this post I was planning to search for this awesome rendering of yours. I'll just link to the post rather than confuse innocent googlers searching for Discovery Tower info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 But really, I do care about tacky or not, that's why I said that's a valid argument. I'm definitely not for flashy neon lights, but the simple Continental Airlines blue light at the top was good and it'd be nice to see that simple style lighting across more buildings.But let's face it, in Houston money talks and that's why we don't see an extravagent night skyline... I wouldn't mind if that changed though.I am not really a fan of colored lights. If anything was to be done, I'd only be a fan of limited white lights, which I think could look more classy, which is one way to describe Houston's skyline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 (edited) Many people on here seem to think that when I brought up the idea that downtown Houston could use more lighting, I meant Vegas-style lighting. Not at all, Houston should have more classy lighting than Vegas. A perfect example would be the new Methodist building, they just completed the exterior lighting and it looks great. No neon, but a more classy type of lighting, which enhances the building's architecture. There is such as thing as tasteful exterior lighting, would Williams Tower be as iconic without the rotating beacon at night? Houston has some great examples of architecture, why keep them hidden at night? I'm glad Discovery Tower has the top/windmill structure lit up at night, it makes the building stand out. I'm beginning to think that some posters are embarrassed by our architecture, and do not want anyone to see our beautiful buildings at night. I've never seen anyone so adamantly opposed to lighting, it can be beautiful if done right. Edited July 21, 2010 by mfastx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumby Posted August 11, 2010 Share Posted August 11, 2010 Our downtown skyline is beautiful... on a clear day, anyway. When the brown fog isn't there, I absolutely love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGM Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 I'm digging it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrodiii Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 thought that this may have been the reason http://blog.chron.com/primeproperty/2013/07/chevron-to-build-downtown-tower/?cmpid=hpbn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purdueenginerd Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Where'd you get this rendering? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brijonmang Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) Here's a really rough update adding the Hines building and just for fun I threw in a filler building basically in the location of the Stream/Linbeck tower. Â If Lockmat would like to provide me with a teaser look again I could draw something up a little closer but I also don't want to get him in trouble. Â Â http://s7.photobucket.com/user/brijonmang/media/DtownSkyline_zpsfc4a0b55.jpg.html'> Â Edited to include 5 Allen Center as per Urbannizer's post. Â I didn't include it because it seems pretty unlikely to happen at this point (my opinion) But it could at least be included in this fantasy portrayal anyway. Â Edited July 3, 2013 by brijonmang 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 NICE!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbannizer Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Even though it's on hold for now, there's also Five Allen Center.  2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClutchCity Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I like the updated skyline picture with Five Allen Center covering Three Allen Center. The blue with all the other new glass buildings gives the skyline a more modern feel. Linbeck's building looks goofy over there all by itself though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZKB9 Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 So awesome! This skyline is just begging for a supertall, a crown jewel of some sort. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Linbecks tower would have a huge impact on the skyline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Here's a really rough update adding the Hines building and just for fun I threw in a filler building basically in the location of the Stream/Linbeck tower.  If Lockmat would like to provide me with a teaser look again I could draw something up a little closer but I also don't want to get him in trouble.    Edited to include 5 Allen Center as per Urbannizer's post.  I didn't include it because it seems pretty unlikely to happen at this point (my opinion) But it could at least be included in this fantasy portrayal anyway.  great job! thanks for making this.. i suck at photoshop and was curious how the new towers would effect the skyline. any chance you could make the Hines tower taller to reflect the new supposed official height? also IMO the new Chevron tower may be a little short since according to the renders its about equivalent in height to a 58 story building if you count each floor and consider the double high floors as 2 stories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 alright, now that the International Tower rendering has leaked this REALLY needs to be updated. all these new towers are getting me excited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howard Huge Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 alright, now that the International Tower rendering has leaked this REALLY needs to be updated. all these new towers are getting me excited.I concur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 alright, now that the International Tower rendering has leaked this REALLY needs to be updated. all these new towers are getting me excited. Â 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brijonmang Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Here is a very crude attempt at updating this with what we have for the International tower. Â http://s7.photobucket.com/user/brijonmang/media/DtownSkyline_zps33e272e2.jpg.html'> 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nativehoustonion Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 How funny! What an update!  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howard Huge Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Here is a very crude attempt at updating this with what we have for the International tower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud713 Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 woooo... thank you! did the Hines tower ever get extended after they announced the 49 story redesign? or are you waiting until more "official" information comes out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatesdisastr Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Here is a very crude attempt at updating this with what we have for the International tower. Â Â I love how awful the original quality of this picture is before the photoshopped additions. As grainy as all the existing buildings are, the whole thing looks like it is photoshopped together haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purdueenginerd Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 So many blue glass high rises! Architects need to diversify their photoshop painting skills! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brijonmang Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I love how awful the original quality of this picture is before the photoshopped additions. As grainy as all the existing buildings are, the whole thing looks like it is photoshopped together haha If I use another picture and start over will you forgive me?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowerSpotter Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 If I use another picture and start over will you forgive me??Haha, the idea was just to see how the skyline would look with the proposed buildings. You did great. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brijonmang Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Haha, the idea was just to see how the skyline would look with the proposed buildings. You did great. Thanks, I was thinking it might be worth doing something from the north where you could basically see all of these minus the Chevron building. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.