Marksmu Posted July 28, 2009 Share Posted July 28, 2009 Hmmmmmmmm, who knew dogcatcher was a race ?He listed both blacks and Canadians...I thought they were the same now...I recall a politician got in trouble for this not too long ago! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gto250us Posted August 10, 2009 Share Posted August 10, 2009 Anyone notice the similarity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJones Posted August 11, 2009 Author Share Posted August 11, 2009 I don't know gto, I think Colin Clive looks a bit more like a moustacheless Hitler more than Shelia Lee in that movie still, but that is just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchwinnChopper68 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylejack Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Here's an article on this fake doctor. http://lonestartimes.com/2009/08/13/obama-camp-plants-fake-doc-che-fan-at-jackson-lee-forum/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Here's an article on this fake doctor. http://lonestartimes.com/2009/08/13/obama-camp-plants-fake-doc-che-fan-at-jackson-lee-forum/i see even 6th ward favorite maria isabel is involved. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchwinnChopper68 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 "There’s some folks who have begun calling Democrat Town Hall meetings “greenhouses.” Because there”s so many plants in them." Love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kylejack Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i see even 6th ward favorite maria isabel is involved. lolYeah, haha, she got national attention with the Che flag thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heights CPA Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 I see the topic about the townhall has been removed. This is more censorship by the democrats who think free speech is only their perogative and who will not tolerate opposing views. Then they wonder why people get angry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpperWestEnder Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Or maybe it was removed because a town hall on healthcare has nothing to do with architecture in the Heights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Or perhaps Republicans simply cannot read. Look in the Politics sub-section of the Way Off Topic section, and you will find no less than 3 SJL topics for the SJL obsessed...right where they belong, as opposed to the Heights section where you put your thread.While jumping to conclusions is symptomatic of the hard right, looking foolish when your conclusion is debunked is as well.http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/index.php?showtopic=21550http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/index.php?showtopic=21461http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/index.php?showtopic=21074I look forward to an enlightened response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heights CPA Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Or perhaps Republicans simply cannot read. Look in the Politics sub-section of the Way Off Topic section, and you will find no less than 3 SJL topics for the SJL obsessed...right where they belong, as opposed to the Heights section where you put your thread.While jumping to conclusions is symptomatic of the hard right, looking foolish when your conclusion is debunked is as well.http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/index.php?showtopic=21550http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/index.php?showtopic=21461http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/index.php?showtopic=21074I look forward to an enlightened response.I don't disagree that it may have been in the wrong place but it was SJL's office that started the thread there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian0123 Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 I don't disagree that it may have been in the wrong place but it was SJL's office that started the thread there.It doesn't matter who started the thread... the fact is that you jumped to wild conclusions and started spewing typical right-wing garbage before knowing the facts. Any other talking points from Bill O'Reilly or Limbaugh you want to throw out while you're at it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heights CPA Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 It doesn't matter who started the thread... the fact is that you jumped to wild conclusions and started spewing typical right-wing garbage before knowing the facts. Any other talking points from Bill O'Reilly or Limbaugh you want to throw out while you're at it?I did not jump to any wild conclusion. The thread was up for several days until it went negative on SJL. Then it was removed.You however did jump to conclusions. I do not care for O'Reilly or Limbaugh nor do I watch/listen to their programs. I am part of the conservative plurality that outnumbers liberals two to one nationally. Painting us with such a broad brush is just as ignorant as me linking the Muslim down the street with the cowardly terrorists that kill innocent men, women and children in public places.Wanting limited government and fiscal responsibility in DC and thinking that the government will do a poor job of running healthcare, puts me with the majority of Americans and you in the minority. I have not made any personal attacks on you however, you have accused me of spewing garbage and linked me to people I have no connection to. This is typical of the left. You are losing the Obamacare argument and have nothing left but ridicule, lies and misrepresentation.Before you acuse me of being against healthcare reform, think again. But the problems need targeted legislation to address specific items - not the baby with the bath solution proposed by the dems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 I did not jump to any wild conclusion. Your initial post pretty well speaks for itself. But, your subsequent denials continue to draw attention to it. Keep up the good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heights_yankee Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 I did not jump to any wild conclusion. The thread was up for several days until it went negative on SJL. Then it was removed.You however did jump to conclusions. I do not care for O'Reilly or Limbaugh nor do I watch/listen to their programs. I am part of the conservative plurality that outnumbers liberals two to one nationally. Painting us with such a broad brush is just as ignorant as me linking the Muslim down the street with the cowardly terrorists that kill innocent men, women and children in public places.Wanting limited government and fiscal responsibility in DC and thinking that the government will do a poor job of running healthcare, puts me with the majority of Americans and you in the minority. I have not made any personal attacks on you however, you have accused me of spewing garbage and linked me to people I have no connection to. This is typical of the left. You are losing the Obamacare argument and have nothing left but ridicule, lies and misrepresentation.Before you acuse me of being against healthcare reform, think again. But the problems need targeted legislation to address specific items - not the baby with the bath solution proposed by the dems.and again i will be asking this thread be moved or fullt removed.i am as political as they come but this forum is not where i visit to read or debate politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heights_yankee Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 Or maybe it was removed because a town hall on healthcare has nothing to do with architecture in the Heights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 I see the topic about the townhall has been removed. This is more censorship by the democrats who think free speech is only their perogative and who will not tolerate opposing views. Then they wonder why people get angry.What Democrat do you think "censored" your free speech? Do you mean the registered Republican who owns this forum?When the thread turned political it was moved to the Politics section. What's the problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJones Posted August 23, 2009 Author Share Posted August 23, 2009 AAhhhhhhhhhhh, another satisfied HAIF customer. HCPA, you know I am most vocal about Demorat this or Obamaidolism that,when I see blatant Dem. wrongdoing, but you got Ed firgured ALL wrong. One would think that in the year that you have been here and put up all those posts, you little chatty cathy you,that it was painfully obvious that Ed is on the right side of things. Will wonders never cease ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heights CPA Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 AAhhhhhhhhhhh, another satisfied HAIF customer. HCPA, you know I am most vocal about Demorat this or Obamaidolism that,when I see blatant Dem. wrongdoing, but you got Ed firgured ALL wrong. One would think that in the year that you have been here and put up all those posts, you little chatty cathy you,that it was painfully obvious that Ed is on the right side of things. Will wonders never cease ?This thread was marked "Moved". Had that been done with the initial one, the issue would have never come up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 This thread was marked "Moved". Had that been done with the initial one If I hadn't jumped to conclusions and projected my personal political biases onto someone else, the issue would have never come up.There, I fixed that for you.Threads are rarely marked moved because it makes things look messy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heights CPA Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 There, I fixed that for you.Threads are rarely marked moved because it makes things look messy.Not very professional for an "editor". I did not start it. Others made negative comments before I did. I it was SJL staff that posted it to the wrong place in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highway6 Posted September 10, 2009 Share Posted September 10, 2009 So apparently SLJ has been holding an aisle seat for the last 3 days in preparation for tonight's speech.Ok.. not really. Still though..Annoying.. and she's dressed like a fruit Popsicle.. blah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLWM8609 Posted September 10, 2009 Share Posted September 10, 2009 she's dressed like a fruit Popsicle.. blah.LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highway6 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Holy Hell.. Houston Pres linked to this Daily Caller article. If you already hate SJL, you're gonna love this. If you're one of the few people that like/respect her, and you still like/respect her after reading this, then you're messed up in the head.http://dailycaller.c...la-jackson-lee/A lot of politicians give nicknames to their aides. George W. Bush famously referred to his attorney general, Alberto Gonzalez, as “Fredo.” Mitch Daniels, then head of the Office of Management and Budget, was known as “The Blade.” Barack Obama reportedly called Larry Summers, his chief economic advisor, “Dr. Kevorkian.”Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas also hands out nicknames to the people who work for her. The Houston Democrat addressed one of her employees as “you stupid mother****er.” And not just once, but “constantly,” recalls the staffer, “like, all the time.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Charlie Sheen should run for her district. Congress needs more honest polygamy-related non sequitur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Charlie Sheen should run for her district. Congress needs more honest polygamy-related non sequitur.And more than a little fun to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLWM8609 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Charlie Sheen should run for her district. Congress needs more honest polygamy-related non sequitur.If he'll do the dougie while in a crack induced stupor at the intersection of Scott and Elgin, he has my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTAWACS Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 I say we vote her out of office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fringe Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 She has always been an embarrassment yet they just keep re-electing her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.