ricco67 Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Here is the last of the videos for this time frame. Will probably wait 6 months for the next shoot.http://youtu.be/nsRfn42Y2eM 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted January 3, 2012 Share Posted January 3, 2012 Thanks for the videos. I'm impressed with the amount of rail I see so far. I can't wait to ride on these new lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrLan34 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 more videoshttp://www.ridemetro.org/CurrentProjects/METRORailExpansion.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Thanks for the videos. I'm impressed with the amount of rail I see so far. I can't wait to ride on these new lines.It is pretty impressive, I think all the track is down between 59 and dumble, minus the bit under the real railway. Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 (edited) Seems like someone has a personal vandetta they wanted to air out on the comments of the latest video. I was stunned that it would go that way.And another update, they are just now starting work on the underpass near dowling under the railroad tracks. I'm still a bit bummed by that, but whatever. I'm starting to wonder if perhaps I should do this again in three months.Thoughts?EDIT: ADD. Edited January 18, 2012 by ricco67 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citykid09 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 A few things just hit hit me while watching those videos.1. Main street won't be the only F***ed up street in downtown with one lane in each direction.2. There will be a plethora of more collisions with the trains.In my own opinion I beleive that METRO is making a mistake by placing the rail on the streets. The rail should have its own right of way or be below or above ground away from the pedestrian and auto traffic. Houston is too big not to have the space for a slim right of way for light rail trains. I just don't think its a great idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 An above- or below-grade line would seem to have made more sense in areas such as downtown and the TMC, although, admittedly the obliteration of pre-existing skywalks and tunnels would've been an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
innerloop Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 2. There will be a plethora of more collisions with the trains.Unfortunately that's true. But it's a train on a track, it's not like the train is jumping the rails to gobble up innocent cars. And I agree that it's a valid debate whether the trains are on-grade or not. But that is a separate issue. We can't let our city's transportation future be held hostage by bad drivers.And frankly, if a collision with a train gets a bad driver off the road before they have the chance to crash into me or my family, then I don't have a problem with that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 (edited) We can't let our city's transportation future be held hostage by bad drivers.And frankly, if a collision with a train gets a bad driver off the road before they have the chance to crash into me or my family, then I don't have a problem with that.This x eleventy billion.being both a bicyclist, and motorcyclist I rejoice every time someone 'doesn't notice' a red light, or a train, or a clearly marked sign signaling imminent collision with a train. Hopefully the very costly mistake they made will open their eyes and make them more cautious when driving.If they can't notice a 14' tall, 90' long, 8' wide train with lights and horns blaring constantly, they sure as hell aren't going to notice me on my bicycle or motorcycle. There is absolutely no excuse for the lackadaisical attitude people have when piloting their 2 ton frigate of death, I hate to be a mean spirited person, but I think it's good that there's dangers present on the roadways that might just help people make a decision to pay attention.Lord knows the government isn't going to give up the opportunity to collect gasoline taxes from someone just because they don't pay attention when behind the wheel!edit, yes I realize mistakes happen, and with the high number of drivers that multiplies the chance for something to happen, however, it's good to point out that most accidents could have been avoided. typically with vehicular accidents it could have been avoided by someone paying better attention to driving, or following the posted rules of the road. Edited January 19, 2012 by samagon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 (edited) A few things just hit hit me while watching those videos.1. Main street won't be the only F***ed up street in downtown with one lane in each direction.2. There will be a plethora of more collisions with the trains.In my own opinion I beleive that METRO is making a mistake by placing the rail on the streets. The rail should have its own right of way or be below or above ground away from the pedestrian and auto traffic. Houston is too big not to have the space for a slim right of way for light rail trains. I just don't think its a great idea.Funny that you would say these things "hit" you while watching the video, when you have posted the exact same thoughts about Houston's rail plans on multiple previous occasions. We get it already, citykid -- you think everyone should have rail just like Atlanta's. Edited January 19, 2012 by Houston19514 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eiknujrac Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 (edited) In my own opinion I beleive that METRO is making a mistake by placing the rail on the streets. The rail should have its own right of way or be below or above ground away from the pedestrian and auto traffic. Houston is too big not to have the space for a slim right of way for light rail trains. I just don't think its a great idea.Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't getting funding for the current plan already difficult enough? How much more would it have cost to build above or below grade rail?It seems to me like this is one of the common complaints of people that have or will never use the rail frequently. And then they turn around and complain about how much money Houston is wasting on building rail. Edited January 20, 2012 by Eiknujrac 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't getting funding for the current plan already difficult enough? How much more would it have cost to build above or below grade rail?It seems to me like this is one of the common complaints of people that have or will never use the rail frequently. And then they turn around and complain about how much money Houston is wasting on building rail.Don't forget that people will complain that above ground rail would be too ugly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LarryDierker Posted January 22, 2012 Share Posted January 22, 2012 couldn't they add a few crossing arms to lessen collisions from idiot drivers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted January 22, 2012 Share Posted January 22, 2012 That was done years ago, and presumably there will be crossing arms at key intersections on the new lines as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 was driving by looking for pictures to shoot late last night, and saw they are finally doing work under the harrisburg tunnel. Harrisburg/Texas/Dowling intersection is going to be a nightmare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 (edited) That was done years ago, and presumably there will be crossing arms at key intersections on the new lines as well.key interesections: intersections that have a high proportion of people who don't pay attention, and need more things blinking at them to make them pay attention to what they should be doing.they've been working on the Harrisburg tunnel part for about a month now, or at least, the eastbound traffic was directed to the westbound lanes about a month ago. Edited February 15, 2012 by samagon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Went walking a few weeks ago on Harrisburg where the old shopping area was. Seems it's not nearly as easy to walk as it once was. Sidewalks are no longer wide. The street is about 12 to 18" below the sidewalk depending on where you are. While the trees are nice, manuevering a wheelchair between the tree and street will be challenging. This was taken in front of a furniture store, hence the mattress out front. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Except for the tree, that sidewalk looks just fine. It's hard to imagine that the sidewalk was wider before the street was re-done, do you have any before pics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Personally, I don't think the tree belongs on that particular spot.. I'm sure it meets at least the ADA standards, but I wonder if the business would get a citation fort blocking the sidewalk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 He's right, the sidewalk right there was wider.Except for the tree, that sidewalk looks just fine. It's hard to imagine that the sidewalk was wider before the street was re-done, do you have any before pics?He's right, it was wider and less encumbered by obstacles. You can see for yourself on Google Streetview. The block in question is the north side of Harrisburg, immediately east of 67th Street. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 He's right, it was wider and less encumbered by obstacles. You can see for yourself on Google Streetview. The block in question is the north side of Harrisburg, immediately east of 67th Street.Yes, it does look to be slightly wider. I don't know why they would try to force a tree there, but again, the sidewalk looks wide enough to me. It's not like the area is bustling with pedestrian activity, lol. But they are pushing it a bit, just not enough space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musicman Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Except for the tree, that sidewalk looks just fine. It's hard to imagine that the sidewalk was wider before the street was re-done, do you have any before pics?Why is it hard to imagine? I would say it was 15 ft or so to support the businesses in the area. in my youth i remember walking in the area frequently with many other pedestrians. Sears had a large store in the area which was a neighborhood staple for decades. if i remember i'll take a pic from across the street this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfastx Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Why is it hard to imagine? I would say it was 15 ft or so to support the businesses in the area. in my youth i remember walking in the area frequently with many other pedestrians. Sears had a large store in the area which was a neighborhood staple for decades. if i remember i'll take a pic from across the street this weekend.It's hard to imagine because generally sidewalks in Houston suck. It looks like this was a rare exception, and I've already admitted that I was wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 I was out and about experimenting with RAW photos, and I thought I'd snap a pic or two. Still trying to get the hang of editing them, so they might appear amateurish. actually, several, but here are my faves. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHB2 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 nice pics! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 (edited) great pictures, it's hard to get WB right in RAW for night shots, takes a lot of PP, I used to shoot only RAW, but have moved away from it, the image processing in camera has gotten so good, I hardly ever have to do any PP after shooting.anyway...I guess the 20 million for infrastructure didn't include putting in a new streetlight to replace the one that is cantered at a 15 degree angle... Edited February 29, 2012 by samagon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I'm starting to shoot RAW to take care of some issues I have, particularly since I love shooting at night (see previous photos), so I'm hoping to correct some errors. Believe it or not, there is very little post done on the photos. I'm about to get Photoshop Elements....but anyway....I'm sure the lamp will eventually be replaced once construction in that area is done. That thing has been tilted in one direction or another for months. I'm assuming things keep bumping into it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 (edited) Yeah, didn't think of that, wouldn't make much sense to replace that lamp post now, and have someone bump it, making the new one lean too! My only comment on your photo, is I would personally set the Aperture a little tighter (like F11, or F16), a tighter aperture at night will create 'crisper' shots, that and (it's personal preference) it will give those neat lines coming off the light sources (http://famouswonders...e-colesseum.jpg) hard to explain what they are. Anyway, since photography is an art, try shooting the same scene using all sorts of different settings, see what the differences are, and use the settings that gives you the best chance to take the shot that best represents what you want to show people that and I would have included the top of the stadium in the frame. at any rate, I prefer the BW you took, but they are both great shots, imo. Edited February 29, 2012 by samagon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricco67 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I shoot with a 28 2.8 at night because of speed, which is a bit of a necessity of where I shoot at night. It was shot with a 2.8 because I don't like the "starring" effect I get with a higher aperture number. I'm hoping to get a new 50mm 1.7 in a few weeks, though. If I have time, I'll give it another shot tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I am so confused with the aperture, shutter speed and ISO. They all deal with light but I'm having a hard time differentiating between them all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.