Jump to content

Texasota

Full Member
  • Posts

    2,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Texasota

  1. This is all so relevant to the subject of town squares in Houston.
  2. Go west. There are plenty of homeless people along Westheimer/Richmond etc west of Uptown. And yes, downtown is more walkable than uptown, largely because of scale. Individual blocks are much, much smaller than Uptown, and they're laid out in a consistent, predictable grid. That makes it much easier to get between places, and to adjust your route if you change your mind after you've already started walking.
  3. Even the Energy Corridor is well west of the city's demographic center. Even if you pretend that nothing exists east of Downtown, the Energy Corridor would still not be the demographic center. I wonder if, after they finish filling in greenfields between Spring and The Woodlands, the area between The Woodlands and Conroe will be next. I suppose it probably won't even take that long.
  4. If you open 3 bags of M&Ms and each bag has one blue M&M, then one blue M&M is typical per bag of M&Ms. In a single bag of M&Ms, multiple blue M&Ms would in fact be atypical. That analogy would only make sense if there were multiple "Heights Wests."
  5. Well that would be appropriate density for that intersection at least.
  6. Not exactly. This is TIRZ money, so it's only property taxes paid on properties within the TIRZ. Depending on how specific "you guys" was meant to be.
  7. Yeah, somewhere between Spring and The Woodlands is nowhere near the "demographic center of Houston." And if its Camp Strake then that's actually outside the Houston metro area (I believe.)
  8. townhomes are not the problem. "Gated" is the problem. And yes we have rivers. They're called bayous.
  9. Hmmm... Hopefully that means additional buildings in the vacant blocks immediately south and west.
  10. No, I meant the "Hines" part. that seemed weirdly specific yet totally misleading. It almost made it seem like a recent Hines development. It is home to the Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, but the building is generally just referred to as the Architecture Building. As for beautiful... I dont think you've spent very much time in the building if that's your description of it.
  11. yeah that courtyards not doin much for me. especially fenced. better than a parking lot aesthetically, but not really in terms of use.
  12. There are ways to provide for that without cutting the building's front door off from the sidewalk.
  13. Nooooooo... Keep downtown classy!
  14. of course. it's a (relatively) small lot for a tower. Plus why wouldn't they? What would they do with the rest of the lot?
  15. That's a beautiful building on that block. I'd hate to see it razed.
  16. No I mean the actual physical buildings that are there. Check out the demo reports on Swamplot: most days there are multiple demos of older, 2 story brick homes being demoed in favor of new construction. Or for that matter, the Hines residential building in the Museum District: that's a perfectly fine block that will be mostly razed. Oh, and even just today: the Caroline Collective: http://swamplot.com/the-singular-demolition-of-museum-parks-caroline-collective/2014-01-03/
  17. Argh, the skyline fetish! Montrose and the museum district would both pretty much have to be wiped out for this to happen. The museum district is well on its way, but I hope Montrose avoids that fate.
  18. Yes. Reworked. As in, as originally laid out, New York had much smaller blocks. The Olmsteadification of Manhattan was then copied throughout the country, including in more western cities/towns like Minneapolis and Houston Heights. (Downtown Minneapolis, which was laid out a bit earlier, has square blocks.)
  19. I would hope we don't get a supertall. We need 2 50-stories, or 4 25-stories, or, honestly, 20 5-stories way more than we need some symbolic supertall.
×
×
  • Create New...