s3mh Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 GM is notorious in the dealership world for their heavy handed control over the design of franchisee dealership buildings. They actually mandated a specific floor tile for dealerships a few years back. Honda has also been very aggressive in forcing franchisees to upgrade to very similar building designs. It has been a long running battle between manufacturers and dealerships on control of brand image. Dealerships want to create their own brand image to set themselves off from the other stores in town. Manufacturers want to diminish the dealerships brand image because they think that it minimizes their brand, especially when a dealership group carries multiple manufacturer lines. Also, for a small dealership like Knapp, using an off the shelf design saves a lot of money versus hiring an architect to design a dealership showroom from scratch. I am sure the design they are using has already been built several times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollusk Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 It's called brand control. You may not like it, but the GM brand is extremely valuable and homogeneous storefronts protect that brand. "Brand control" as imposed by the same bright light MBAs that came over from Proctor & Gamble, etc. to run a car company as if it were selling toothpaste and laundry soap - with the result that engineering and differentiation between the nameplates went into the dumper, followed by sales. As I said, dipsticks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted March 29, 2014 Author Share Posted March 29, 2014 That doesn't look like the rendering I've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avossos Posted March 29, 2014 Share Posted March 29, 2014 That doesn't look like the rendering I've seen.I hope that's true!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jt16 Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 "Brand control" as imposed by the same bright light MBAs that came over from Proctor & Gamble, etc. to run a car company as if it were selling toothpaste and laundry soap - with the result that engineering and differentiation between the nameplates went into the dumper, followed by sales.As I said, dipsticks.Like I said, you may not like it, but that's what drives these types of decisions. I'm not even defending it, but trying to provide a little conversation on how large corporate decisions might be made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollusk Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 No argument here over the fact of the process - but when consensus mediocrity is the goal, a descending circle into the drain is frequently the result. GM at its peak was driven (and run at the top) by engineers and stylists; more recently it's been the CYA and shuffle responsibility types that somehow determined that if they kept the same part number on the redesign of a very defective ignition switch perhaps they could hide the mistake a while longer - a decision that's ultimately costing the company even more. It's going to be a very slow ship to turn, but Mary Barra at least came up from the engineering side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 In all fairness though car companies are hardly the only ones to try to maintain a unified appearance. Gas stations started standardizing layouts back in the 1930s. While commercial architecture is rarely stunning, it's extremely interesting to me to see how it evolves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollusk Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Branding of structures makes more sense when one is dealing with a commodity product - gas, groceries, motels. At least for some of us, though, cars are not so easily turned into beige commodities. Try too hard to do that and you get this: http://jalopnik.com/the-2014-oldsmobile-cutlass-is-better-than-ever-1550547372 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subdude Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Branding of structures makes more sense when one is dealing with a commodity product - gas, groceries, motels. At least for some of us, though, cars are not so easily turned into beige commodities. Try too hard to do that and you get this: http://jalopnik.com/the-2014-oldsmobile-cutlass-is-better-than-ever-1550547372Funny article. Always been into cars, so I sympathize, but there's always going to be a market segment for mundane cars and architecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHDickerson Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 That doesn't look like the rendering I've seen.That's the rendering posted on Knapp's website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted April 5, 2014 Author Share Posted April 5, 2014 That's the rendering posted on Knapp's website.That's very strange. The blue print I saw for the building had the dealership look more like a modern version of their art deco store right behind it. Apparently now it has 15 salesman offices now instead of the 6 I report earlier. I think the change in design comes from GM now. GM is providing 50% of the funding while Knapp is paying the other half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHDickerson Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 If I could design it, I would build a big modern glass showroom with the original art deco building on the inside as they offices and have some classic Chevys posted around the art deco building to set the scene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonMidtown Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 Making progress... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triton Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 The original design was very nice. Perhaps GM told them to alter the design to have the parking lot full in the front to make the business look more busy. Either way, here's what we unfortunately got: 2014-09-20 12.30.58 by marclongoria, on Flickr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.