phillip_white

Let me re-phrase: This is dangerous, as it will create an obstruction between bikers and cross traffic (concerns allayed if space is maintained for visibility); drivers will look to ensure no cars are coming [in the direction of the one-way street], then plow ahead without looking for traffic in the bike path [coming from both directions].

Yeah, from what I've seen/heard the plan is create a two-way bike lane "alley" between the existing curb and a new parking strip. This is dangerous, as it will create an obstruction between bikers and cross traffic; drivers will look to ensure no cars are coming, then plow ahead without looking for traffic in the bike path. And once it's built, it's hard to modify because of the permanence of concrete. And all of this because some Midtown residents are afraid to lose the precious parking spots in front of their door... as though that is somehow guaranteed to them.

I think this is from the original design. The protected bike path on Austin in its current iteration will be two-way. https://www.midtownhouston.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Midtown-Special-Report.pdf

Brick is going up:

This website apparently doesn't care about take-down requests: https://skyrisecities.com/database/projects/district

You never know with Caydon. These Aussies could single-handedly merge the downtown and med center skylines.

I'm 99.9% certain that should be McGowen.

I hope this is true, as it makes me feel a lot better about the swastika on the roof.

Either way, I'm just glad they're almost done. We've been waiting to use this plaza for almost a year now.

What's the HAIF discount code??? 😆

206 Accessible Routes 206.1 General. Accessible routes shall be provided in accordance with 206 and shall comply with Chapter 4. 206.2 Where Required. Accessible routes shall be provided where required by 206.2. 206.2.1 Site Arrival Points. At least one accessible route shall be provided within the site from accessible parking spaces and accessible passenger loading zones; public streets and sidewalks; and public transportation stops to the accessible building or facility entrance they serve. Advisory 206.2.1 Site Arrival Points. Each site arrival point must be connected by an accessible route to the accessible building entrance or entrances served. Where two or more similar site arrival points, such as bus stops, serve the same accessible entrance or entrances, both bus stops must be on accessible routes. In addition, the accessible routes must serve all of the accessible entrances on the site. Advisory 206.2.1 Site Arrival Points Exception 2. Access from site arrival points may include vehicular ways. Where a vehicular way, or a portion of a vehicular way, is provided for pedestrian travel, such as within a shopping center or shopping mall parking lot, this exception does not apply. 206.2.2 Within a Site. At least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, accessible facilities, accessible elements, and accessible spaces that are on the same site. Hey there, I haven't blocked you (I try not to live in an echo chamber made up of only those who agree with me) but I decided to not to reply to your previous post as you seemed to be certain of an unpredictable outcome. I appreciate your further info on building codes; I will likely look more into this as I find this kind of stuff interesting. You and I have no beef. I appreciate your contributions and perspectives on urban design/architecture. With that said, I drove by again today to get a better idea of what is going on. It seems they have removed the darker bricks that were laying on top of the pavers and somehow (perhaps using an industrial router or tile saw?) cut out the pavers. It's not 100% certain, but I'm still betting the whole plaza will be at the same grade with the darker bricks.

That's the western portion. Still unsure what's going on with the eastern side. The bricks are raised a full inch above grade so it might be a section that's inaccessible for pedestrians with retention for the fountain water?

I was thinking this as well and hoping I was wrong. I would not put it past the MRA to split a huge park into two sections and then close off one to the public.

Upon further inspection, you are likely correct about cutting the darker blocks into the pavers below. If you look at the picture that launched a thousand comments, they have already installed concentric rings of pavers. So they probably laid the darker blocks out to mark the pavers, pull them out, and cut them. CASE CLOSED.

Speaking of disability, wheelchair access might be a better point than tripping hazard.

There's no way that's the finished product. It's an entire plaza of trip hazards...

Here's a crummy drive-by pic of the striping done on the lot MRA owns across from the bus station.

I don't think the Greyhound Station itself is to blame for the current state of the area, and losing it would actually be a negative in the grand scheme of a well-connected interstate transit option. You have the Megabus station as well as the Metro transit hub nearby and those two don't get nearly as much negative attention. There needs to be an increased police presence for a while to show these ne'er-do-wells, pimps, and drug dealers that they don't have the run of the place.

You may have forgotten how big it was going to be because it was supposed to be completed 3 years ago...

Texting the number in your image leads you here: https://knockrentals.com/community/977e1c7a6267711e/apartment/rental/houston I might be scheduling a tour... 😄

I thought the two way was supposed to be on Austin?

I have a feeling that they jumped the gun on publishing that link and a lot more people than "friends and family" are interested in attending. The RSVP is now password protected.

From their website: http://www.meekspartners.com/high-rise/block-387 7 over 3 Metal with Retail 291 unit count Status: In Design