Jump to content

George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH)


pineda

Recommended Posts

On 3/28/2018 at 7:20 PM, Slick Vik said:

Interjet starting IAH-BJX June 22. There is huge demand here as United runs 4 flights a day.

 

Looks like initial fares are right at $300 RT while United is asking $638. 

 

Interjet is also flying the Sukhoi Superjet on the route. They are one of the few north american airlines using the SSJ100 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Superjet_100

 

It holds 93 versus United's 4X daily service with EMB-175 aircraft which have 76 seats. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/19/2018 at 1:00 PM, wxman said:

As you enter IAH from JFK blvd, you'll notice all the signs along the left side of the road directing you to the one of the terminals based on your airline. I noticed yesterday that there is another Terminal D airlines sign that is up (and blank) but I assume they are anticipating more foreign flags soon. Any word on anything heading our way this year?

Looks like Ethiopian secures 5th freedoms to operate IAH-Accra-Addis Ababa. No start date announced yet:

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/newsroom.aviator.aero/ethiopian-airlines-secures-rights-for-direct-flights-between-accra-and-texas/amp/

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I hope they’re considering a large expansion as they continue to cut routes from IAH to Mexico (Huatulco, Villahermosa, Mazatlan) according to wiki. I wonder if there will be an influx of business and flight routes as oil continue to creep towards $100 a barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From www.airliners.net

 

At a recent event in Houston, Scott Kirby told attendees in the coming years UA could add new nonstop service to 20 new cities from IAH including international destinations. He also stated UA is growing IAH and expects to hit 700 flights a day up from 540 although no time frame was given for when we should expect IAH to hit the 700 mark.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/30/2018 at 4:37 PM, wilcal said:

 

Looks like initial fares are right at $300 RT while United is asking $638. 

 

Interjet is also flying the Sukhoi Superjet on the route. They are one of the few north american airlines using the SSJ100 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Superjet_100

 

It holds 93 versus United's 4X daily service with EMB-175 aircraft which have 76 seats. 

 

 

 

The flight has disappeared 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I read on wikipedia (such a reliable source, I know) says that as of August 2018, Emirates will add another flight (?) to Houston that will continue on to Caracas, Venezuela. Is this big news? If so, I'm sort of underwhelmed. 

 

I'm surprised at the lack of new flights/carriers at IAH this year. Does anybody else feel that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wxman said:

I read on wikipedia (such a reliable source, I know) says that as of August 2018, Emirates will add another flight (?) to Houston that will continue on to Caracas, Venezuela. Is this big news? If so, I'm sort of underwhelmed. 

 

I'm surprised at the lack of new flights/carriers at IAH this year. Does anybody else feel that way?

Venezuela?  I was there many decades ago.  It was good then (not great but good).  But, thanks to the socialist kleptocracy it is now essentially a failed state that is no longer safe for foreigners or locals.

 

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/venezuela-travel-advisory.html

 

i wish the airline good luck selling tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UtterlyUrban said:

Venezuela?  I was there many decades ago.  It was good then (not great but good).  But, thanks to the socialist kleptocracy it is now essentially a failed state that is no longer safe for foreigners or locals.

 

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/venezuela-travel-advisory.html

 

i wish the airline good luck selling tickets.

 

Yeah.  That seems very unlikely.  So unlikely that it sounds more like something would read on The Onion.  ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Once United starts delivering 787-10 to EWR later this year, then I could see how that will open up extra aircraft for the other United hubs, including IAH. -If- IAH will indeed get more United European routes then I hope it's something other than Paris. It's fun to speculate, but United has a lot of hubs with a lot of needs, lets hope IAH doesn't get left out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paris is one.

 

We we’re chatting and he said “hey, we’re getting new international non stops on United. He said a list went out to employees.

 

i said “Mexico?” (Sigh)

he said, “no....European places.”

 

He said there are several. We’ll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These would be nice:

 

IAH to Paris

IAH to Berlin

IAH to zurich

IAHto Vienna

IAH to Milan

 

Actually, what I would really want is for the international flights from the Entire NY Hub (and most of Washasington DC’s) to be picked up and moved to Houston.  That would be good!!!  Oh, and they could toss in Chicago and San Fran too.  One giant superhub that would allow me to always flight direct.  YES!  

 

Oh, I will put the ‘ludes down now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, UtterlyUrban said:

These would be nice:

 

IAH to Paris

IAH to Berlin

IAH to zurich

IAHto Vienna

IAH to Milan

 

Actually, what I would really want is for the international flights from the Entire NY Hub (and most of Washasington DC’s) to be picked up and moved to Houston.  That would be good!!!  Oh, and they could toss in Chicago and San Fran too.  One giant superhub that would allow me to always flight direct.  YES!  

 

Oh, I will put the ‘ludes down now.

 

Lol. The logical ones would be Paris, Vienna (Star Alliance partner Austrian hub), Zurich (partner Swiss hub), and Brussels (partner hub).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, ToryGattis said:

 

Lol. The logical ones would be Paris, Vienna (Star Alliance partner Austrian hub), Zurich (partner Swiss hub), and Brussels (partner hub).

 

I'm worried about United and AF competing on IAH-CDG. AF is my favorite euro carrier out of IAH (at least when I'm flying on my own dime). Their premium economy product is the best out of IAH. Not just the seats, but overall on the plane and at the airport it's a damn good product. I would hate for AF to reduce frequency at IAH or leave all together. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 102IAHexpress said:

 

 

I'm worried about United and AF competing on IAH-CDG. AF is my favorite euro carrier out of IAH (at least when I'm flying on my own dime). Their premium economy product is the best out of IAH. Not just the seats, but overall on the plane and at the airport it's a damn good product. I would hate for AF to reduce frequency at IAH or leave all together. 

 

I flew Air France a lot in the early 90's, and it sucked, big time.  CDG has always been the worst airport in the Free World, especially if you are flying to Africa.The CDG staff are awful,in 2000 we had one security agent tell an entire Continental flight "You stupid Americans, I hope your flight doesn't go today", after the previous day flight had been cancelled due to mechanical issues. Maybe they've changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 102IAHexpress said:

 

 

I'm worried about United and AF competing on IAH-CDG. AF is my favorite euro carrier out of IAH (at least when I'm flying on my own dime). Their premium economy product is the best out of IAH. Not just the seats, but overall on the plane and at the airport it's a damn good product. I would hate for AF to reduce frequency at IAH or leave all together. 

 

 

Well, they both had it for many years just fine.  My understanding is that AF is pretty safe because they have the Schlumberger corporate contract.

 

Here's what I think it comes down to, once you get beyond European cities in the oil business: which Europeans are doing business in Mexico and Central America? Because Houston is the ideal connecting hub for that from Europe. There are some car plants in Mexico (inc. VW), but I don't know what else beyond that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ToryGattis said:

 

Well, they both had it for many years just fine.  

 

I think for just two? Continental merged with United in 2010 then United cut IAH CDG in 2012. It is true Continental and Air France operated the route just fine for many years but I assume that was because they were both SkyTeam partners. Actually, I think United's and Continental's combined operating certificate was not complete 'till late 2011, so AF may have still been benefitting from a CO code share even after the corporate merger but before the "FAA" merger. But I may be misremembering. Now, in 2018 they are competitors in every way. In my opinion I would rather have AF fly the route that UA. I am not a huge fan of UA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ross said:

I flew Air France a lot in the early 90's, and it sucked, big time.  CDG has always been the worst airport in the Free World, especially if you are flying to Africa.The CDG staff are awful,in 2000 we had one security agent tell an entire Continental flight "You stupid Americans, I hope your flight doesn't go today", after the previous day flight had been cancelled due to mechanical issues. Maybe they've changed.

 

I agree the French, especially Parisians are rude. But have you flown United lately? It's a nightmare. A rude AF employee doesn't compare to just one UA flight attendant on a power trip. The worst euro carrier on its worst day is far better than the best US carrier on its best day across the Atlantic. CDG I agree with you has issues, but most airports outside of Asia do. When I flew through CDG in March I paid 60 euros to rent a day hotel room inside the Airport. I slept for several hours, took a shower, got refreshed then cleared security in less than 2 minutes (because it was the middle of the afternoon). Made CDG much more pleasant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 102IAHexpress said:

 

I think for just two? Continental merged with United in 2010 then United cut IAH CDG in 2012. It is true Continental and Air France operated the route just fine for many years but I assume that was because they were both SkyTeam partners. Actually, I think United's and Continental's combined operating certificate was not complete 'till late 2011, so AF may have still been benefitting from a CO code share even after the corporate merger but before the "FAA" merger. But I may be misremembering. Now, in 2018 they are competitors in every way. In my opinion I would rather have AF fly the route that UA. I am not a huge fan of UA. 

 

Well, AF certainly has the stronger position, as I'm sure much more of their Paris feed is interested in going to Houston than UA's Houston feed is interested in going to Paris, mainly because of geography. Houston's logical draw zone from the southwest to go on to Paris is pretty weak - mainly Mexico (which would prefer not to connect in the USA) - and there are more logical hubs than Houston to go through from the western USA.  I can see why UA couldn't support the flight.  I'll bet it also filled up with reward tickets, and they might as well send reward fliers from Houston through Chicago, DC, or NYC hubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

United is announcing three new European routes tomorrow (San Francisco - Amsterdam, Newark - Naples, and Newark - Prague), but none from IAH. Maybe something else will come later, but United has been launching a lot of new routes lately and Houston seems to be getting shafted (Sydney was obviously a big add but that was launched very early in the year, and since then we’ve only had the minor routes of IAH-Dayton and IAH-Akron while seemingly every other hub has gotten 5-10 new routes at least). Hopefully wxman is correct and we hear something soon, but so far it’s been a disappointing year for IAH routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, asubrt said:

United is announcing three new European routes tomorrow (San Francisco - Amsterdam, Newark - Naples, and Newark - Prague), but none from IAH. Maybe something else will come later, but United has been launching a lot of new routes lately and Houston seems to be getting shafted (Sydney was obviously a big add but that was launched very early in the year, and since then we’ve only had the minor routes of IAH-Dayton and IAH-Akron while seemingly every other hub has gotten 5-10 new routes at least). Hopefully wxman is correct and we hear something soon, but so far it’s been a disappointing year for IAH routes.

 

Beat me to it! 

https://twitter.com/united?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

 

I agree that IAH doesn't always get new routes like some of other hubs but I think the "shaft" should also include allocation of newer aircraft. When including aircraft types, I would say ORD gets shafted the most. Some of the United planes flying out of ORD are junk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, 102IAHexpress said:

 

Beat me to it! 

https://twitter.com/united?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

 

I agree that IAH doesn't always get new routes like some of other hubs but I think the "shaft" should also include allocation of newer aircraft. When including aircraft types, I would say ORD gets shafted the most. Some of the United planes flying out of ORD are junk. 

 

Yeah I was really just referring to new routes, but IAH did get the 737 MAX 9 which is pretty nice (although in my opinion a bit small for the 7.5 hour IAH-ANC which I flew earlier this month), and it was also the original 787 base I believe, so at least they do tend to deploy some newer aircraft here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, kennyc05 said:

What is the future plan for the subway in the basement?

 

Extended to downtown, of course.  It'd probably only take 15 minutes longer than at-grade light rail.  (Kidding.)

 

It has to be kept in operation, replaced with moving sidewalks, or replaced with an interterminal bus system--plenty of UA passengers park in one garage, only to arrive in another terminal.  Last time I heard it was to be rebuilt--the problem being all of the parts for the existing train have to be handmade since the technology has been way superseded.  There is no way that it will be replaced as the tunnel would have to be completely rebuilt and expanded between the hotel and A, and, however inefficient, a bus system may be, it'll always win out on a benefit-cost basis.  Plenty more pressing projects at IAH and limited funds.

Edited by mattyt36
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mattyt36 said:

 

Extended to downtown, of course.  It'd probably only take 15 minutes longer than at-grade light rail.  (Kidding.)

 

It has to be kept in operation, replaced with moving sidewalks, or replaced with an interterminal bus system--plenty of UA passengers park in one garage, only to arrive in another terminal.  Last time I heard it was to be rebuilt--the problem being all of the parts for the existing train have to be handmade since the technology has been way superseded.  There is no way that it will be replaced as the tunnel would have to be completely rebuilt and expanded between the hotel and A, and, however inefficient, a bus system may be, it'll always win out on a benefit-cost basis.  Plenty more pressing projects at IAH and limited funds.

Thanks for the reply! I used it yesterday for the first it was really underwhelming:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/16/2016 at 8:54 AM, tigereye said:

Architect for new Terminal D to be hired by the end of the fall. Does that mean previous renders were just placeholders and project's design may change with architect hired?

 

Construction by Late 2017

 

https://communityimpact.com/houston/lake-houston-humble-kingwood/development-construction/2016/10/06/iah-plans-4-billion-facelift/

 

I know this is 2 years old but I don't frequent this part of the forum . . . 

 

Major infrastructure projects such as the terminal are planned first.  Any drawings that come with them are conceptual renderings only.  The planning specifications/requirements are then handed over to the designer.  In this case there's not much you can do with the footprint of the building given the constrained site and the geometry necessary to accommodate the taxilanes, but of course the design of the building itself could vary wildly.  (That said, flashy design elements typically get eliminated during the value engineering process.)

 

In any case, I wouldn't take the lack of news on this project to be a positive.  The design team has had, what, 2 years at this point?  I'd imagine there must be major budget concerns or airline support has waned.

 

All of the drawings for the Spaceport, for example, are nothing other than conceptual renderings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kennyc05 said:

Thanks for the reply! I used it yesterday for the first it was really underwhelming:(

 

It's decent at what it does, if the alternative is nothing.  It was actually built by the Walt Disney Corporation to replace the initial system, which didn't even last 5 years.

 

https://stuckattheairport.com/tag/walt-disney-company/

 

DFW's original train system, airtrans, ended up being quite the bust as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...