Jump to content

MrFubbles

Full Member
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MrFubbles

  1. https://www.houstoniamag.com/arts-and-culture/2023/10/houston-orange-show-expansion Should this be moved to Going Up? Target completion: 2026-2027 More info in February
  2. I really like this project - props to them for restoring!
  3. If I'm not mistaken, these towers are Philip Johnson originals (Rothko, Williams Tower, Menil House, Chapel of St. Basil, Penzoil, etc.) Would be a shame to see them go
  4. Whoever spearheaded this project I need to shake their hand. It's perfect
  5. This makes the assumption that bigger freeways are the reason why it's so easy to get around town - but that's not necessarily true! It might mean more cars get to sit in traffic every day See here: https://rmi.org/more-lanes-do-not-mean-less-traffic/ From our very own Kinder Institute https://kinder.rice.edu/urbanedge/what-if-we-spent-billions-improve-access-instead-gridlock The reason people live outside the loop in the first place is due to the freeways - it's not like the suburbs existed and we one day decided to connect them to the city. I'm not trying to dunk on anyone. I'm asking what research TxDot is using to justify this relentless pursuit of highway widening
  6. Adding 4 lanes to I-10? What research is being done to justify these changes? We are already a laughing stock with our existing highway mess
  7. Thanks for all the advice everyone! Will keep yall posted. Hopefully something exciting in the works 👀
  8. I found this on the permitting website: A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained before a commercial building or an individual lease space within a commercial building may be occupied, or if changes to an existing occupancy classification are made. https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/hpwcode1106 If the building is currently used only as residential, does that mean I have to apply for a change in "occupancy classification"? The wording is a bit vague, makes it seem like the certificate is only needed for a currently commercial building to be re-classified. My use case would be residential unit to retail.
  9. Hello - does anyone know what the process looks like to turn a residential building into retail along Heights Boulevard? Can any non-contributing building be listed as retail, or do you have to submit a variance? Thanks!
  10. Two-way bike lanes in the median? Too good to be true
  11. Am I missing something regarding the pierce elevated? How can this be the most expensive component if they're just demolishing a few ramps with little new construction? Does $196mm include the park maybe?
  12. This area is becoming pretty dense - hopefully the foot traffic can compensate for the lack of parking. If it doesn't now, maybe in the next 5ish years
  13. Is this project a part of the Pickard Chilton urban master plan? https://www.pickardchilton.com/work/urban-master-plan
  14. This might be the ugliest building I've ever seen but props to whoever made the renderings, looks exactly like the real version!
  15. In downtown there's enough building height to get decent shade on most streets, and the tunnels offer a dry path when it rains. I'm more so talking about other walkable areas like Westheimer and Montrose. The only covered sidewalks in this area I'm aware of are in front of Pavement, Anvil (barely), Bamboo (on Montrose, closed) and Soundwaves, all of which I'm guessing got grandfathered in and are not legal to build today. Why is that? Edit: I'm talking specifically about covered city sidewalks, not just a canopy within the building ordinance
  16. I'd be interested to hear what the city thinks about giving concessions on certain building code requirements (like max. frameable square footage or easements) in exchange for the arcade shade. Posting this as I bake in the sun on Westheimer
  17. Are covered sidewalks legal to build? With the rising heat, how can we push for more shade on our streets? Like this:
  18. do you mean banausic? in case anyone was wondering: ba·nau·sic adjective FORMAL not operating on a refined or elevated level; mundane. "serious discussion of scientific problems was regarded as banausic" relating to technical work. "his contribution may have been administrative or banausic"
  19. I hold an irrational amount of dislike for this building solely due to the parking facing Westheimer
×
×
  • Create New...