MrFubbles
Full Member-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by MrFubbles
-
Proposed Residential Development At 400 Jensen Dr.
MrFubbles replied to Urbannizer's topic in Going Up!
Totally agree with this - those sidewalks are probably more cost efficient. I don't know how the city budgets aesthetic when it comes to sidewalks but I feel like special provisions should be made for historical parts of the city. -
I truly cannot put into words how much I despise this plan for the quad. It looks like the Woodlands Church Can't we just replace the statue and move on? That curved path is offensive
- 796 replies
-
- 2
-
- rice university
- texas medical center
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Proposed 1000 unit high-rise at 2711 Main?
-
My current favorite development in Houston. Reminds me of the gentle density in Brooklyn, Sydney or LA. Hopefully more developers will be able to use this as a mold Do we know how many parking spots this will have? Looks like 1 per unit?
- 41 replies
-
- 4
-
- the farb companiess
- multifamily
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Interesting that they're not adding more underground parking
- 796 replies
-
- 1
-
- rice university
- texas medical center
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The Orange Show At 2401 Munger St.
MrFubbles replied to terrbo's topic in Third Ward and University of Houston
https://www.houstoniamag.com/arts-and-culture/2023/10/houston-orange-show-expansion Should this be moved to Going Up? Target completion: 2026-2027 More info in February -
Food truck trolley
- 412 replies
-
- 1
-
- urban genesis
- downtown
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
UNITi Montrose: 9-Story Apartments At 701 Richmond Ave.
MrFubbles replied to CrockpotandGravel's topic in Going Up!
Is that a pool in the middle? 😅- 237 replies
-
- montrose
- avid living 713
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I really like this project - props to them for restoring!
-
If I'm not mistaken, these towers are Philip Johnson originals (Rothko, Williams Tower, Menil House, Chapel of St. Basil, Penzoil, etc.) Would be a shame to see them go
- 89 replies
-
- 1
-
Whoever spearheaded this project I need to shake their hand. It's perfect
-
This makes the assumption that bigger freeways are the reason why it's so easy to get around town - but that's not necessarily true! It might mean more cars get to sit in traffic every day See here: https://rmi.org/more-lanes-do-not-mean-less-traffic/ From our very own Kinder Institute https://kinder.rice.edu/urbanedge/what-if-we-spent-billions-improve-access-instead-gridlock The reason people live outside the loop in the first place is due to the freeways - it's not like the suburbs existed and we one day decided to connect them to the city. I'm not trying to dunk on anyone. I'm asking what research TxDot is using to justify this relentless pursuit of highway widening
- 3,375 replies
-
- 2
-
The city's addiction to lanes is mind blowing
-
Adding 4 lanes to I-10? What research is being done to justify these changes? We are already a laughing stock with our existing highway mess
- 3,375 replies
-
- 4
-
Thanks for all the advice everyone! Will keep yall posted. Hopefully something exciting in the works 👀
-
I found this on the permitting website: A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained before a commercial building or an individual lease space within a commercial building may be occupied, or if changes to an existing occupancy classification are made. https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/hpwcode1106 If the building is currently used only as residential, does that mean I have to apply for a change in "occupancy classification"? The wording is a bit vague, makes it seem like the certificate is only needed for a currently commercial building to be re-classified. My use case would be residential unit to retail.
-
Hello - does anyone know what the process looks like to turn a residential building into retail along Heights Boulevard? Can any non-contributing building be listed as retail, or do you have to submit a variance? Thanks!
-
Two-way bike lanes in the median? Too good to be true
-
Am I missing something regarding the pierce elevated? How can this be the most expensive component if they're just demolishing a few ramps with little new construction? Does $196mm include the park maybe?
- 3,375 replies
-
This area is becoming pretty dense - hopefully the foot traffic can compensate for the lack of parking. If it doesn't now, maybe in the next 5ish years
- 153 replies
-
- 3
-
No renderings?
-
They were likely just collecting data
-
Is this project a part of the Pickard Chilton urban master plan? https://www.pickardchilton.com/work/urban-master-plan
- 117 replies
-
- office
- ziegler cooper
- (and 6 more)
-
This might be the ugliest building I've ever seen but props to whoever made the renderings, looks exactly like the real version!
- 44 replies
-
- 6
-
- halff associates
- office
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
In downtown there's enough building height to get decent shade on most streets, and the tunnels offer a dry path when it rains. I'm more so talking about other walkable areas like Westheimer and Montrose. The only covered sidewalks in this area I'm aware of are in front of Pavement, Anvil (barely), Bamboo (on Montrose, closed) and Soundwaves, all of which I'm guessing got grandfathered in and are not legal to build today. Why is that? Edit: I'm talking specifically about covered city sidewalks, not just a canopy within the building ordinance