Jump to content

LTAWACS

Full Member
  • Posts

    5,585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by LTAWACS

  1. I've seen this said a few times before but I've never seen a source. Maybe they did, but I just don't buy it. They wouldn't willingly give up a source of income as big as this. They're a business, and they need more income to expand and continue to operate. Making this free just because it seems like a nice thing to do isn't a good enough reason.

    Government agencies are not "businesses" that need to grow and expand. They exist solely to serve the public/taxpayers.

    Why does the hctra need to collect tolls? To pay the construction costs of building MORE toll roads? So they can erect toll booths in order to collect revenue to fund even more toll roads so the can erect toll booths in order to collect revenue to fund even more toll roads??????

    Where does this nickel and dime robbery end????

  2. That's a brochure. Id like to see a direct quote from a HCTRA official. If this WAS true it would've been advertised a lot more than a simple brochure.

    Come on Bigfootsocks, who woul WANT to pay extra to drive on a freeway? Especially around here?

    I think the anawer to that is no one.

  3. Obviously I didn't mean it like that, I meant that toll revenues would obviously go towards paying off construction and future maintenance as it would seem highly unlikely the planners or HCTRA wouldn't have thought of something as simple as that.

    The tolls weren't supposed to be used for maintenance, as far as I understand the situation. I understand that once construction costs were paid, the roads would be "free" - or at least as "free" as the interstate.

  4. That doesn't make sense. They wouldn't find just construction without thinking of the additional maintenance costs there would be. That's just poor planning.

    In my limited accounting and finance experience, there is a difference. The two can be and usually are separated on the books.

  5. Southwest Fwy is also titled Lloyd Bensten highway. I'm not sure how long this has been the case but I recently noticed brown signs indicating this designation. Personally I'm not a fan of naming highways after people because the name is arbitrary to the direction. In a huge fan of naming based of direction or major city/town in the path (I.e. Katy). Naming after senators and the like seems very chicagoish

    I believe it's been called that since the mid 80's.

×
×
  • Create New...