Jump to content

shasta

Full Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    510

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by shasta

  1. shasta
    Not true...there are blocks surrounding the development that can be included as a Phase II.
  2. shasta
    "The traffic's insane, it is everywhere in our city, and it's not going to get any better, and the city keeps approving things that are not going to get any better," Mays said. I took this from the article, which is ironic, since the voters of Houston don't seem to give a crap about mass transit options and the most obnoxious opponents like to call it a "toy train". Plus they have, on multiple occasions voted DOWN zoning and any attempt at city planning. Do people even follow the elections and what they are agreeing to? The reality is that these trains move people and are specially effective in the densifying parts of the inner loop and Uptown.
  3. shasta
    What a shame if it is strictly office with token retail and the bottom. This site is perfect for a mixed use residential building. After all, its front yard would be Market Square (Mini-Discovery Green), it is close proximity to the historic buildings that also front Market Square, and is close to Main Street and the Theater District. I could see a really nice residential building fitting in here. You've seen the design?
  4. shasta
    When are the three rail lines, currently under construction, scheduled to open for use?
  5. shasta
    The problem with the City of Houston is that they have no checks and balances regarding projects that fall under the city's incentive programs. They hand out incentives for developers, based on an initial scheme, and then the developer pulls out a portion of the project, or cheapens the design, and they still get the same incentive. This has already happened twice, that I know of: 1) Houston Pavilions.....The developer promised a residential component and then pulled back...they still received the incentives 2) Embassy Suites....The developer took advantage of the downtown Hotel incentive plan and then substantially altered (cheapened) the design Let's hope the same fate doesn't happen to this high profile project but if developers have found a way around the system it just might be happening again.
  6. shasta
    Why don't the people who are worried about Ashby actually use their energy to get Zoning on the ballots again. Zoning has been voted down multiple time. It's not the developers fault.
  7. shasta
    Something with a touch of variety to the exterior, like this new one going up in Los Angeles. http://brighamyen.com/2013/02/07/renderings-revealed-new-1100-foot-wilshire-grand-tower-in-downtown-los-angeles/#more-9536
  8. shasta
    wouldn't the new apartment building on the rail line in the museum district qualify?
  9. shasta
    Can you tell us more about this project...I am not familiar with it unless it was one of those towers that were floated out a few years back. Is Chevron running the design of this building instead of it being a pure Spec building? This has a HUGE implication on it being a trophy tower instead of a 'safe' building hoping to attract tenants.
  10. shasta
    I am curently int he Townhouse market and am trying to eduacate myself on quality, the builders, and negotiation tactics. I 've vistied InTown Home's Fannin Station and liked what I saw. However, after reading the following thread and I am questioning everything about this company: http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/topic/4460-on-lovett-homes/ Has anything changed since this thread was created (2005), or has it gotten worse for InTown Homes? Any owners of InTown or Lovett homes here? If not InTown, what other companies should I look at that build quality homes in, or virtually, inside the loop?
  11. shasta
    There is actually a proposal in front of the State Legislature this year. It would allow for up to 6 Urban Casinos and 2 Beach/resort casinos in the state. The bill is written in a way where they would have to be high quality (minimum $ amount), and would have to be supported by the city. I am thinking one would be perfect for downtown somnewhere in between the Covention Center Ditrict, the Stadiums, anf the Bayou. I'm sure someone else has more info on this proposal.
  12. shasta
    I disagree entirely. I almost view the western part of downtown as the sterile, imposing skyline district. The pedestal buildings offer little in urban connectivity. I would almost forget about that part of downtown and focus on the center and east sides which include projects that are created for urban connectivity- anchored by parks, sporting events, retail, residential, tourism centers, conventions, and hotels.
  13. shasta
    Why not brong a Target to downtown? Perhabs they can fit one onto the now vacated book store space.
  14. shasta
    I'm obviously not going to complain but i'd be disappointed if it didn't have some form of retail fsacing the sqaure. Retail + Residential would be optimal since it is fronting the square. A pedestal offive building with no dialogue with the urban environmement would be the worst thing (other than undeveloped)
  15. shasta
    It seems as if that lot fronting Market Square would be pefect for a residential development with retail facing the square but then I remebered this is Houston, so we'll most likely get a lifeless pedestal office tower in what could be a very urban part of downtown.
  16. shasta
    Red Scare, The voters already approved the framework for 5 additional rail lines, including the University and Uptown Lines in what................ 2003? The Uptown Management District needs to focus on their previous commitments BEFORE they propose adding additionakl costs for a plan that doesn't accomplish what the voters approved. If it is addition too...fine but it looks like they are preparing the pro-transit detarctors or a soft landing.
  17. shasta
    http://www.chron.com/memorial/news/article/Metro-supports-Post-Oak-transit-proposal-3974878.php
  18. shasta
    I wonder if this will only highlight the historical sites of the region or also focus on some of the cultural centers as well. I'm thinking they have the chance to make tourists aware of the museums, or theaters, and then send them on the light rail to these destinations. There is great potential to highlight many of the city's features if the all work together. Hopefully it is not just the historical markers.
  19. shasta
    That is great news! Does anyone have a list of the total 'on-campus' housing buildings and # of beds. I found some but not all. I wonder what the total count is so we can finally end this "commuter school" thing.
  20. shasta
    Here's a link to the Downtown Management Districts 2011-2015 Service Plan dated November 2010: http://www.downtowndistrict.org/Home/AboutUs/ServicePlan/2011-2015DraftServiceP/2011-2015%20Service%20Plan.PDF On page 18 they detail their Goal #4 of (making downtown) a Vibrant Sustainable Mixed use Place with (4b) Exciting neighborhoods to live in. They continue; Action: Consistent with newly prepared neighborhood plans for downtown, work to attract more residential development at various price points including finding ways to bridge economic and physical challenges. This includes required market research and analyses. Operating: $30,000/ $150,000 Action: In collaboration with other entities, work to expand open space, park & recreational offerings for downtown residents as well as addressing the current functionality of existing spaces. Operating: $20,000/ $100,000 Action: Working with others, pursue school/ educational opportunities in or immediately adjacent to downtown to meet the needs of a younger residential population. Operating: $10,000/ $50,000 Whatever the case....its a win win because the city WANTS residential so it can further develop a mixed-use environment. before you bash understand that this is a process and compared to what this portion of downtown looked like 15 years ago (almost ALL surface parking lots) I'd say they are making progress. Let them continue to build a customer base that will make downtown attractive for outside investors and developers.
  21. shasta
    Part of the reason why the Houston Pavilions underperformed is because the developers decided to pull the residential component from the project, at the last minute. They also pulled the hotel component. The city was NOT pleased with this at all. The residential component would have included a customer base and possibly would have changed the type of tenant in the complex. This Finger's project, is in response to an initiative created by the city. They are focusing on increasing the residential presence in the city, which will lead to more residential supporting needs: http://www.chron.com/business/article/City-plans-incentives-for-downtown-homes-3791742.php In fact, in the last 10-15 years the city has been the major figure in charge of downtown development. They have built 3 stadiums/arenas, convention center expansions, 2 hotels (one in the works), 2 parks for its residents (DG and Market Sq.), 2 rail lines branching out, and have worked with a number other entities to improve the downtown district from a n attraction/ quality of life standpoint. No one is expecting this thing to turn around overnight but it reassuring to see that the city has identified what ingredient is missing from downtown and are focused on how to fix it. They are focused... So far One developer has taken the bait......let's see if other developers follow and build more residential structures in the sea of empty lots downtown. If you know a multi-family housing developer, please make them aware of this credit. According to my calculations, Fingers could receive $5.7 if they build this project. AS far as spending city money. the city has to make intelligent decisions on what investment would lead to further returns. Building Discovery Green created development opportunities (residential, hotel, office) bordering the park which the city can now recoup additional tax revenue form those property. they probably have already calculated how long it will take for that decision, Discovery Green, the pay for itself, while benefiting the city in return.
  22. shasta
    I am thinking that something similar to the scale and density of West Avenue would work great in this site. That would look great downtown, especially next to the ballpark and all that is going around it. Do we have any renders yet?
  23. shasta
    10.30 P.M Comedy Central
  24. shasta
    I think it is safe to say that this project, in the form we saw a few years back, is dead. It seems as if the developer is going to proceed with an independent condo/apartment tower and I've seen nothing to suggest that it is part of a bigger plan at this point. It has been ghosltly quiet despite the fact that many projects have broken inside the inner loop including a number of large scale apartment complexes. The retail component was such a small percentage of the majority of the building's floor print (ground level only) that they could have built the apartments and sustained until the retail was leased out. Ironically, The apartment demand is really HIGH right now and Regent Square would be doing really well if they had built it as per the original time frame a couple years back. Unfortunately, the developer may have missed their opportunity as we are set to get a number of new apartment complexes int he near future and I have little confidence that the developer will move on this project, as we know it, anytime soon.
  25. shasta
    Who is the developer of this project?
×
×
  • Create New...