Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 996
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Went yesterday and it was amazing.  Very well done. The architecture, the exhibits, everything.  Here are some photos:            

A couple of pics of the ceiling in the main atrium, taken from the third floor. As you can see, there’s tons of natural light augmented with some artificial light. I can’t wait to see this building on

Posted Images

Better than I expected and we get a bonus Lake Flato, on the roof of the parking garage with restaurants at the train station!

Underground parking to open up the grounds. Its brilliant! I'm also very excited to her about the importance of the inside and the light with reference to Piano's treatment of light. SWTSIG. This is an unabashed "GAME CHANGER!"

 

There, I said it also.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A big shoutout to Fayez Sarofim and the Kinders, along with the eight heavy lifters!

What a great city we are fortunate to live in with so many philanthropic families.

 

Can't wait to hear the buzz when this is announced in NYC later this week. Should be some nice print articles in Art in America, and ArtForum.

Probably some of the major arch. magazines. Like the Menil Drawing Institute, Buffalo Bayou park, the Herman Park gardens, and the announcement of Memorial Parks overhaul, these types of projects all are focused on quality of life issues that will go so far in creating a positive buzz for Houston and make all of our lives that much better!

 

Hurry up and make it happen! 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Monarch,

I liked your observation about the building appearing to "Breath".  Below is Steven Holl's water color "vision" that his team had to follow...or do something with.  Mmmmkay...

 

So, the design does not seem to be a huge statement, but it is gorgeous.  MFAH is a fantastic museum with a very impressive collection.  The art is what should steal the show...and this collection can do it (Unlike the Getty in LA).  The interior/gallery spaces are what will count. Tintow knows his stuff.  He will make this one of the Best museums to view the art, that there is.  I am impressed by the restraint and elegance of the renderings/design.  Like many of the very fine museums in Texas, by which it will be gauged.   It will really showcase at night, which is one of Holl's trademarks.   

 

Was expecting more about the Landscaping concept.  I guess we now have that, also, to look forward to. 

 

 

Can't wait to see more renderings. 

post-11710-0-90206000-1421169040.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Those renderings are very sexy. This project looks like an absolute delight and, as the Chronicle article suggests, will help the MFAH act as a nice bridge between the Museum District and Rice. 

 

now if we can continue to bridge the gap between the museum district and midtown and midtown into downtown....

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree Sparrow.  Assuming this is open to the public, which I expect that it will be, The Glassell will definitely become an favorite icon for the city.  Makes the Museum buildings and Sculpture Garden feel a part of the Park.  This feature alone will pull a lot of people to the Museum District...even if they don't visit any of the museums. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this will most likely (pending how it looks as-built) be the biggest thing to happen to Houston architecturally in 30 years. It finally gives to our current (now fading) boom era the entry into the realm of elevated, soul-moving architecture that it has so far been missing, respectable designs by Pickard Chilton and others notwithstanding.

 

I only feel a sense of regret for my children. Their college savings will take a hit when I donate to this thing.

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate the slope on the Glassell not blocking the charming steeple of the First Presbyterian Church from the intersection of Montrose @ Bissonnet. Should make for an interesting photo op. The roof should also provide a unique view looking south towards Lindsey Plaza and the Obelisk. Who has a good Lens?

 

Thanks for the photos cloud!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cloud713 thanks for getting into the press conference and getting those images of the plans and other things that weren't in the Chronicle.

I liked what Mr. Tinterow said about his concern to produce the best space in the world to view art. His concern about lighting is very important .

Bravo !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh, it was a little tricky. Seemed like parts of the museum were open for business but all the entrances around the van der Rohe buikding had staff standing outside and even police at the main entrance under a temporary tent/awning. We snuck down into the Cafe Express entrance from the street level and filed in line with a tour group and proceeded to follow them past a few staff members through the Turrell Tunnel and popped up into the other building where everything was at. Lol..

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh, it was a little tricky. Seemed like parts of the museum were open for business but all the entrances around the van der Rohe buikding had staff standing outside and even police at the main entrance under a temporary tent/awning. We snuck down into the Cafe Express entrance from the street level and filed in line with a tour group and proceeded to follow them past a few staff members through the Turrell Tunnel and popped up into the other building where everything was at. Lol..

 

cloud713 wins the "stealth haifer" of the year award!!  awesome!  thank you thank you!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is fantastic!  Will like to see more accurate renderings - though this is a Holl design, it'll probably be all wispy and foggy in appearance upon completion!  Like Lake+Flato's design too, given the context I'd say its a nice addition.  That and I understand the MFA has an undersized restoration area so this should bode them well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny because I've always kinda thought of Steven Holl as Gehry-lite which is perfect for our city with buildings that try not to offend. Great selection of architects for this. As soon as I saw the name I knew this was in good hands. Was very surprised by the Lake | Flato design. I didn't even know they were a part of this whole scheme. Awesome stuff by them as well. They are really making a nice statement in this town so good for them, but if Lake | Flato was the opening act, Steven Holl is the big show. He is the quintessential architect of his generation (at least at his level) and always made statements with his architecture. I know he is very popular at my office as I've seen a few of the designers with Steven Holl books of his earlier works on their desks! It's certainly a bold design, but as seen from that night illustration it easily slips right into place. The roof sorta gives the whole building a carved stone type of look like the slopes on top were chiseled from the greater whole. It's more of an accent, but its a great detail. The building I'm most curious about is the new Glassell school! I had no idea they were going to redevelop that area as well and its actually the one that steals the show. The walkable roof from ground floor to terrace is something that is very popular in contemporary architecture and it's almost in every architecture student project, but to actually see it being executed in this city is simply amazing and will be the talk of the town for sure! Just the view alone....I can't wait! Sometimes in as architects especially us young architects we want to go out and just do the most crazy thing ever because surely that will start the next great revolution, but sometimes it more subtle and interesting to just give the scene a slight nudge. This does that. People have been throwing the word game changer, but I look at it more as sort of those life moment markers you see on facebook. This is this moment in Houston's life. It's a 'moment'. yeah not as sexy as gamechanger, but it really is a moment. The moment where Houston matured just a little bit more and grew up just a little bit more. Hopefully it goes even further than that.

 

So if it wasn't obvious from the statement above, I really love the design. Would like to see further info on this and maybe some more interior renders, but I'm definitely impressed. Lets go gaga over this and not the most underwhelming reveal of the day *cough*Amegy 20 story nothing that could be built anywhere in america therefore it's nothing very special and it's just a plain glass building with horns *cough*

 

P.S. Awesome inside work Cloud. Some news program needs to grab you dude! You do better investigative journalism than most. Great images and were far more interesting than just the renders. The models really add context and give the building more character.

Edited by Luminare
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again guys.. it was pretty fun and i was pleased there was additional information posted. a press photographer kept taking pictures of me admiring the model/taking pictures of it, so who knows.. maybe ill end up in published photos attached to an article about the expansion. ive got to admit. i dont think ive ever bumped into a billionaire before tonight.. much less the richest man in Houston (lol, i backed/stood up to adjust when trying to get a close up of the model and it was Rich Kinder [the guy i overheard being told "theres your building".. i googled all the notable people after i got back from the event and realized who a few of them were] that i kind of brushed arms with. he was totally cool and after i tried to back away and let the museum guy continue with his little guided tour/presentation of the model for Kinder, Rich insisted i get the photo i was trying to take).

btw, since my pictures werent that great.. it was all set up in the front/Binz entrance to the van der Rohe building and for all i know the model/renderings might stay there for a little while if anyone is in the neighborhood and wants to drop by to see/snap some better photos of everything now that all the press/donors/architects arent crowding the room.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 ive got to admit. i dont think ive ever bumped into a billionaire before tonight.. much less the richest man in Houston (lol, i backed/stood up to adjust when trying to get a close up of the model and it was Rich Kinder [the guy i overheard being told "theres your building".. i googled all the notable people after i got back from the event and realized who a few of them were] that i kind of brushed arms with. he was totally cool and after i tried to back away and let the museum guy continue with his little guided tour/presentation of the model for Kinder, Rich insisted i get the photo i was trying to take).

 

Sounds like he's kinder than most billionaires.

 

I had a similar experience with his wife one time. She was heading the committee to design Discovery Green and there was a solicitation for public input, so I sent in an e-mail describing an idea. The next morning she forwarded the e-mail to everyone on the committee (copying me) and gushed about how excited she was reading the description. The idea wasn't used, but it made an impression on me.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Complete schedule:

 

Kinder Building (the new exhibition/restaurant/theater building):  Construction takes place 2017-2019

Glassell School of Art and the Bown Foundation Plaza:  Construction takes place summer 2015-2017

The Sarah Campbell Blaffer Foundation Center for Conservation:  Construction takes place 2016-2017

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm delighted to see a conservation center is part of the plan. MFAH once owned a handsome Carl Milles fountain that suffered internal damage due to corrosion and was no longer on view. According to a former museum staffer, "no one could be found to repair it. so they got rid of it". I've always wondered if this is true, or if it still languishes in a dusty storeroom corner somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What will be great for this building is to help relieve the Mies Addition from having to rotate different collections. From what I have read it's always been a challenging environment to house art especially if it doesn't work with the space. Maybe once this building is finished they won't be pressured to figure out how to fill the Mies Addition with rotating collections and instead start selecting more permanent pieces to fill the galleries that also complement the buildings vast spaces.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This was an announcement from Ellen Cohen today:

Council approved an Economic Development Agreement, also known as a “380 agreement," between the City of Houston and the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (MFAH). Thisagreement allows the City to give a portion of Roseland St. (between Barkdull St. and Berthea St.) to MFAH in exchange for an expanded public Sculpture Garden which will be maintained by the museum. MFAH is currently undergoing a privately funded $350 million expansion which will include new space for galleries, an auditorium, a restaurant, a new building for the Glassell School of Art (including a walkable green roof), a conservation center, an underground parking garage, and the expanded sculpture plaza.

My question is does the MFAH own the property to the north of the Glassel all the way to Barkdull along Montrose?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a museum parking lot.. Right?

No, actually I drove by there yesterday and its got two 30's brick apartment houses on it so I can see that the MFAH probably does own this and will start the Glassell farther North

than the existing Glassell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What will be great for this building is to help relieve the Mies Addition from having to rotate different collections. From what I have read it's always been a challenging environment to house art especially if it doesn't work with the space. Maybe once this building is finished they won't be pressured to figure out how to fill the Mies Addition with rotating collections and instead start selecting more permanent pieces to fill the galleries that also complement the buildings vast spaces.

 

It would be interesting to hear what local architects think of the Mies Addition.  Back in the 80s (I think) MFAH had a director with distinguished credentials, but who apparently hated it ... I remember that he compared it to an airport terminal.

 

I didn't like hearing that, but perhaps he had a point.  Despite that, I always liked the view of the facade from the street, very Miesian international style, good to have an example of that in Houston.  

 

I wonder how many people know that the current "Mies Addition" actually extended an earlier one.  As I recall, the earlier one was similar but set back further from the street, with white-painted steel instead of black.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the Mies Addition.  While not his greatest work, its still Mies.  I mean Frank Lloyd Wright didn't design Fallingwater every day, but his work still trumps 99.999999% of all others.  Even his throwaway work.

 

Its kind of funny - we may finally see the Mies addition(s) used in the manner that they were probably intended when Mies designed them back in the 50s and 70s.

Edited by arche_757
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

... Its kind of funny - we may finally see the Mies addition(s) used in the manner that they were probably intended when Mies designed them back in the 50s and 70s.

 

Good to get some feedback!  How do you think they were intended differently than we see them now?

 

I don't really know the sequence of events, but my recollection is that the current Mies facade was a design that was not implemented until years later (after his death).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Arche on that the Mies Addition by far not his best (this is coming from a guy who was able to experience the New National Gallery in Berlin one of his more praised buildings), but it's still a fine piece of architecture that like many of it's brethren is simply misunderstood by a current generation that run things today who simply can not appreciate it's simplicity and rigor in regards to form and space.

 

The building really plays with level changes and like many modernist buildings from Mies to Corb a big idea was progression through space which is very important in a museum and how you can make that interesting. Immediately when you walk into the main Foyer you see these level changes it beckons you to explore more of the space. Probably the most important aspect which has seems to have frustrated past curators is the verticality of it's interiors which makes filling up the space rather difficult. I imagine that the building wasn't really designed with rotating pieces in mind and more of a place to house selected permanent collections. Large modern art pieces that fill whole rooms and large canvas art would serve very well here.

 

Even though it isn't the best Mies building, like Arche said it's still better than most things that get built, period. What's even more interesting is that this building gets through into a much larger conversation about the value and worth of Modernist architecture and whether many are worth saving or should be put on the national register. That's for another thread.

 

@Cloud  Museum directors honestly could care less whether they show their art in a multi-million dollar building or in a warehouse! Because at the end of the day the one thing that matters is the art and many past Directors have made the conclusion that the building robs the spotlight from the art.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Arche on that the Mies Addition by far not his best (this is coming from a guy who was able to experience the New National Gallery in Berlin one of his more praised buildings), but it's still a fine piece of architecture that like many of it's brethren is simply misunderstood by a current generation that run things today who simply can not appreciate it's simplicity and rigor in regards to form and space.

The building really plays with level changes and like many modernist buildings from Mies to Corb a big idea was progression through space which is very important in a museum and how you can make that interesting. Immediately when you walk into the main Foyer you see these level changes it beckons you to explore more of the space. Probably the most important aspect which has seems to have frustrated past curators is the verticality of it's interiors which makes filling up the space rather difficult. I imagine that the building wasn't really designed with rotating pieces in mind and more of a place to house selected permanent collections. Large modern art pieces that fill whole rooms and large canvas art would serve very well here.

Even though it isn't the best Mies building, like Arche said it's still better than most things that get built, period. What's even more interesting is that this building gets through into a much larger conversation about the value and worth of Modernist architecture and whether many are worth saving or should be put on the national register. That's for another thread.

@Cloud Museum directors honestly could care less whether they show their art in a multi-million dollar building or in a warehouse! Because at the end of the day the one thing that matters is the art and many past Directors have made the conclusion that the building robs the spotlight from the art.

The building robs the spotlight from the art? I don't think the building is very exuberant. Just a classic timeless design by one of the most famous architects of the 20th century. I agree it's likely hard to show off exhibition in the larger auditorium spaces of the Mies, but hopefully they can figure out a decent presentation layout with those spaces now that they have a new auditorium space.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mies addition has always seemed crowded - during exhibitions.  Maybe it was just me?  I think its a fun space though, and look forward to the rest of the campus opening up here before the dawn of the next decade.  Which we are already half-way to!  Hard to believe!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Arche on that the Mies Addition by far not his best (this is coming from a guy who was able to experience the New National Gallery in Berlin one of his more praised buildings), but it's still a fine piece of architecture that like many of it's brethren is simply misunderstood by a current generation that run things today who simply can not appreciate it's simplicity and rigor in regards to form and space.

 

The building really plays with level changes and like many modernist buildings from Mies to Corb a big idea was progression through space which is very important in a museum and how you can make that interesting. Immediately when you walk into the main Foyer you see these level changes it beckons you to explore more of the space. Probably the most important aspect which has seems to have frustrated past curators is the verticality of it's interiors which makes filling up the space rather difficult. I imagine that the building wasn't really designed with rotating pieces in mind and more of a place to house selected permanent collections. Large modern art pieces that fill whole rooms and large canvas art would serve very well here.

 

Even though it isn't the best Mies building, like Arche said it's still better than most things that get built, period. What's even more interesting is that this building gets through into a much larger conversation about the value and worth of Modernist architecture and whether many are worth saving or should be put on the national register. That's for another thread.

 

@Cloud  Museum directors honestly could care less whether they show their art in a multi-million dollar building or in a warehouse! Because at the end of the day the one thing that matters is the art and many past Directors have made the conclusion that the building robs the spotlight from the art.

I never said it was bad!  Mies is Mies is Mies is Mies.

 

It may not be the IIT Architecture School - but its a fine building.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...