SpringTX Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 "With the collaboration of Texas Democrats and Republicans at the state and national levels, Texas will now receive more federal highway dollars, and Houston-area communities will soon come together with the accelerated construction of the Grand Parkway."http://www.hcnonline.com/site/news.cfm?new...id=532533&rfi=6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 Classic.What a warm fuzzy feeling I get, knowing that communities will come together in love and harmony, and all it takes is a 200 foot wide strip of concrete, known as the Grand Parkway.I look forward to reading Kevin Brady's new book, "It Takes a Grand Parkway To Raise a Child". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sevfiv Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 I look forward to reading Kevin Brady's new book, "It Takes a Grand Parkway To Raise a Child". HAHA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YakuzaIce Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 I look forward to reading Kevin Brady's new book, "It Takes a Grand Parkway To Raise a Child".<{POST_SNAPBACK}>LOLIs the reason for the grand parkway really to bring suburban communities together? I always thought of it as something to encourage development and to make it easier for these communities to get to the major arteries (I10, 59, 45, etc...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpringTX Posted July 22, 2005 Author Share Posted July 22, 2005 LOLIs the reason for the grand parkway really to bring suburban communities together? I always thought of it as something to encourage development and to make it easier for these communities to get to the major arteries (I10, 59, 45, etc...)<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Did they mean come together metaphysically (i.e. in the spirit of it) or physically (via the road)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YakuzaIce Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 Did they mean come together metaphysically (i.e. in the spirit of it) or physically (via the road)?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I don't know. I would think physically considering if you want to use federal tax dollars you need more than metaphysical reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestGrayGuy Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 Perhaps one day we could have the hands across the Grand Parkway where the communities would literally come together and hold hands in a sign of unity and love of the concrete artery that has linked them together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidtownCoog Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 Why do I need to be connected to you bunch of Freaks?It's nice to not be so close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted July 23, 2005 Share Posted July 23, 2005 From the article in HCN:The U.S. Congress hopes to send its joint bill to the President sometime next week.meaning: It's not quite a done deal yet.Once federal highway money is allocated to each state, state legislators then meet and determine which districts will receive more than others.meaning: state legislators may decide to spend the money on projects other than the Grand Parkway, meaning it's not quite a done deal yet. Federal highway money is mainly used for mass transit, highway repairs, research, maintenance, transportation systems, intelligence and so on.Which one of these would the Grand Parkway be? (It's not intelligence...)The Grand Parkway will decrease east-west congestion, as well as provide better connections between suburban areas and decrease school traffic.according to whom? The writer? Kevin Brady? I've never heard mention of decreasing school traffic, I know that, and east-west congestion has never been the issue. Remember, Kevin, more spokes, not more hubs?"We are creating more and more jobs outside of Houston, and our suburban communities are growing rapidly," Brady said. "We need the ability to tie these growing communities together. Also, by creating these links, more consumers can utilize the shops, restaurants, and businesses in the northern Houston area."Yes, Kevin, that last sentence is exactly what one would expect to hear out of the mouth of the former Chamber of Commerce Prez. of the Woodlands....Eissler said he also feels confident that federal money will be used for the Grand Parkway and other Houston-area projects.Rob, you might want to check it out, but I don't think the Grand Parkway goes through the Woodlands. You might want to stick to writing more worthless bills about barking dogs and bandit signs. What a great waste of a legislator you are, dude!BTW, if your CAFTA bill passes next week, Kevin Brady, I can't wait to hear your "spin" on how it will benefit the Woodlands area businesses and residents. But, then you'll probably just have one of your assistants type up some "from your friend, Kevin Brady" bull**** article and send it in to the Woodlands Villager. I bet the people who sent your butt to Washington have no earthly idea the crap you're about to dump on their heads with your CAFTA bill. Something tells me you don't come back home much or at least, you won't be anymore, after this fiasco. Good luck with your future plans in becoming one of the Supreme Rulers of the American version of the EU! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-Town Man Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 Pineda, you're a tough one. If I were a legislator, yours would be the last neighborhood that I would want to expand any roads around. Why don't you put together something like that woman Polly Ledvina did to oppose the Katy Freeway expansion, an organization that could really make its voice heard and make things uncomfortable for the likes of Brady? It wouldn't be hard; basically all you need is a catchy name and a website, and you could start getting interviewed by Chronicle reporters who always love an offbeat activist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 Thanks for the compliment, (I think)... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted July 26, 2005 Share Posted July 26, 2005 new route added for Segment F-2 of the Grand Parkway project Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Grand Parkway funding story in Chron.com todayDavid Gornet, executive director of the Grand Parkway Association, said Wednesday that critics "should maybe drive through the areas ... Development is already there."Gee, David, I wonder why all that development is already there? Could it be because people like you and Kevin Brady and John Culberson had meetings with developers years ago promising them the Grand Parkway and showing them the route it would take? Why else would something like the Bridgelands build out in the middle of literally nowhere unless they had some very solid assurances from you guys about the exact placement of the Grand Parkway, and some kind of timeline? I wonder...." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoAtomic Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 new route added for Segment F-2 of the Grand Parkway project<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Pineda - from this it looks like the planners have heeded the critics and moved the route southward, away from the subdivisions north of Spring-Stuebner (Northampton, Mossy Oaks, etc), and away from Klein Oak High School. Am I reading the maps correctly? This would be GREAT news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Actually, according to the map posted, the "2005 Alternate Route" moves the whole thing MUCH closer to Klein Oak High School than before. Whereas, the 2004 Preferred Route was about 1,000 feet from the front doors of Klein Oak High School, this new route proposed by that idiot Senator Jon Lindsay puts it right in their laps. So much for that claim of reducing school traffic congestion....An aside, I've been calling the Grand Parkway for about a week now to find out about this map and no one is answering the phone. I heard from an Klein ISD official last week at the Mold Remediaton Meeting for Northampton Elementary that he had heard that the Grand Parkway has decided to move its' route even further north into Montgomery County. We'll see how this all plays out.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnu Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Grand Parkway funding story in Chron.com todayI thought this was interesting from the chron article:And the bill, which the president is scheduled to sign next week after all, drew opposition from some Texas lawmakers, who pointed out that the state still doesn't get as much funding as it contributes to the federal government via the gasoline tax. (By 2009, Texas will get 92 cents in funding for every $1 its consumers pay in fuel tax).I didn't know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kjb434 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Texas has always been a donor state where they get less than they pay in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeightsGuy Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 Sorry Pineda, but the gig is up. Much in the same way the term "9-11" has been used to steamroll any opposition to new legislation regarding national security, the term "Rita evacuation" will be used to steamroll any opposition to the Grand Parkway. Watch what happens in the coming months, our legislators will start using the term as the "real" reason the Grand Parkway needs to be finished down the corridor of their choosing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedScare Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Yup. You'll never get opposition to a freeway again...or a tollway, as long as it's free during evacuations, never mind that trains move more people faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Interesting that you think that...I've heard people who live out here where I am say that the Rita evacuation proves the point even stronger that we've been pushing all along, that "We need more spokes, not more rims." I guess we'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelimon Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Classic.What a warm fuzzy feeling I get, knowing that communities will come together in love and harmony, and all it takes is a 200 foot wide strip of concrete, known as the Grand Parkway. I look forward to reading Kevin Brady's new book, "It Takes a Grand Parkway To Raise a Child". OMG you are way too funny Redscare LOLIs the reason for the grand parkway really to bring suburban communities together? I always thought of it as something to encourage development and to make it easier for these communities to get to the major arteries (I10, 59, 45, etc...) And avoid downtown all together. Sorry Pineda, but the gig is up. Much in the same way the term "9-11" has been used to steamroll any opposition to new legislation regarding national security, the term "Rita evacuation" will be used to steamroll any opposition to the Grand Parkway. Watch what happens in the coming months, our legislators will start using the term as the "real" reason the Grand Parkway needs to be finished down the corridor of their choosing. yup! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pineda Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 The latest information from the Grand Parkway Association is that they are having a difficult time finding a route to put on a map, because as new routes have been and continually are being discussed, developers have been finding out where these routes might be, and are developing along these potential routes with little regard for transportation planning or for transportation planners, for that matter. The Grand Parkway Association does not do and is not able to do advance purchases in anticipation of certain routes, and when speculative developers find out that a major road might be built near some otherwise worthless rural area without any major roads, they jump on it.This process has seriously slowed the progress of the Grand Parkway much more than anything I or any group of local landowners and homeowners could have ever done. While developers seem to agree that they would love to have the road built NEAR their speculative land purchases, they don't necessarily want the Grand Parkway running directly THROUGH their land either. In the case of Segment F-2, the route that has been decided upon by the Grand Parkway, the PREFERRED route, was placed upon maps years ago, and the land was vacant and owned by locals. But a year or so ago, the locals that owned it sold it to Ronnie and Cathy Matthews, who developed the land under the Peron Corporation name, into Northcrest Village. Their neighborhood plan maps do not show any land set aside for the Grand Parkway at all, and they are not disclosing to potential homeowners that there might be a Grand Parkway where they buy a house today. And so the route continues to fluctuate into an area that is already too highly developed to easily place the road, unlike what happened in Segment D. When that segment was built, it went into rural territory and then the home development followed. Now, the GPA has to fight to preserve a route, and the developers who want the road aren't helping to preserve the route, at least not in their own boundaries.The next meeting for Segment F-2 will be a public hearing in early December or earlyJanuary. The GPA will not hold one over the holiday break. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeightsGuy Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Interesting that you think that...I've heard people who live out here where I am say that the Rita evacuation proves the point even stronger that we've been pushing all along, that "We need more spokes, not more rims." I guess we'll see.That's just it Pineda, as with the term "9-11", it doesn't matter what makes sense. The term "Rita evacuation" is nothing more than a scare tactic, and it will be used by people who want to get the road built. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelimon Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I said this befor on a related topic I think the region needs the grand parkway, but I wish politicians would move this fast when it comes to MASS TRANSIT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.