tw2ntyse7en Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrose1100 Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 You sure have alot of stuff on your desktop.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>You should see my desktop at work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brijonmang Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Go Dubya!Even though youre a SOONER...im gonna have to agree GO DUBYA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skwatra Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 too much work clutter to show the actual desktop but thats the background... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimberlySayWhat Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 One computer just has the Emachines logo wallpaper, but that one is messed up and I can't really use it right now, so I'm using my old HP. Here's the picture on its desktop: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimberlySayWhat Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 For some reason it isn't working. Here's the link:My Webpage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimberlySayWhat Posted March 16, 2005 Share Posted March 16, 2005 What a turd. Screw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tw2ntyse7en Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooner&RiceGrad Posted April 4, 2005 Author Share Posted April 4, 2005 http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=1y09lghttp://tinypic.com/1y09lg Sorry, I can't post images properly with Tinypic.com on this site for some reason... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wow. So you are AbercrombieDude... and HollisterDude. All in one, eh? Now I could of sworn those were my two sons' names... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skwatra Posted April 4, 2005 Share Posted April 4, 2005 The skyline is real.. Those F-16's are infact Texas Air Guard.. But is the photo real, or photoshopped?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>i'm not sure, i know the f16's are accurate, i see them taking off every day. and there's three of them so i'm hoping it's a real shot. maybe someone here knows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-Townballer Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sevfiv Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 this is the left screen (shrink) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmainguy Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 These are my cats: [url=http://img382.imageshack.us/my.php?image=untitled8kd.jpg]http://img38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmainguy Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonianInColorado Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 Here is my main desktop on Ubuntu Linux. The picture is one I took this week with a 35mm Pentax SLR ZX7 camera. The wildflowers are growing along a local road, and when I set up to take the shot, that bee showed up to complete the picture. I did have to get her to sign a model's release, however! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmainguy Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 My cats...[sorry for the mutiple posts...still ImageShack] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted August 20, 2005 Share Posted August 20, 2005 Here is my main desktop on Ubuntu Linux. The picture is one I took this week with a 35mm Pentax SLR ZX7 camera. The wildflowers are growing along a local road, and when I set up to take the shot, that bee showed up to complete the picture. I did have to get her to sign a model's release, however! Nice picture. How did you go digital with it? Did you scan the negative or the print? I have several thousand negatives that I've just given up scanning. I bought a negative scanner and it was just so slow and tedious and the quality so poor I've given up on all of my old pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonianInColorado Posted August 21, 2005 Share Posted August 21, 2005 Nice picture. How did you go digital with it? Did you scan the negative or the print?I have several thousand negatives that I've just given up scanning. I bought a negative scanner and it was just so slow and tedious and the quality so poor I've given up on all of my old pictures.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It was actually very painless. I had them developed at Walgreens and paid $2.99 for them to put them on CD as well as give me negatives and prints. I do have a digital camera (Gateway DC-T50), but the SLR is much more capable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sevfiv Posted August 21, 2005 Share Posted August 21, 2005 Go Dubya!oh my Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted August 21, 2005 Share Posted August 21, 2005 It was actually very painless. I had them developed at Walgreens and paid $2.99 for them to put them on CD as well as give me negatives and prints. I do have a digital camera (Gateway DC-T50), but the SLR is much more capable.Whenever I've done that with my film the CDs they send back only have pictures in two sizes on them -- 640x480 and 1280x1024. If I'm on film, I'm there for a reason, which is that I need 5000x3000 minimum. The negative scanner I have does it, but it takes 30 minutes for each negative and the quality isn't great. One picture I did for the Weather Channel took three tries and an hour of touching-up to get a decent look. That was when I gave up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonianInColorado Posted August 22, 2005 Share Posted August 22, 2005 Whenever I've done that with my film the CDs they send back only have pictures in two sizes on them -- 640x480 and 1280x1024. If I'm on film, I'm there for a reason, which is that I need 5000x3000 minimum. The negative scanner I have does it, but it takes 30 minutes for each negative and the quality isn't great. One picture I did for the Weather Channel took three tries and an hour of touching-up to get a decent look. That was when I gave up.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, I hear you. That is always an issue for hi-res. I would like to have all mine that way as well. However, for sharing online, the CD works fine.If someone comes up with a good solution, I'd like to hear it also. That is why I still keep negatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.