TheNiche Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 You're talking about completely eliminating those charged with implementing it. How this will help bus riders is unclear. The phrase "designed to fail" comes to mind, especially in the context of the absolute and utter disingenuity of anti-transit advocates, particularly on this forum.I don't understand what the point of confusion is, but you aren't getting me. METRO as an organization sucks. I'd prefer for an organization that sucks less (whether by way of better accountability, or through privitization, or whatever it takes) to handle regional mass transit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 While we should strive to improve all forms of transit, the notion that mass transit should be of secondary importance to sole occupant transit is entirely backward.The notion that all non-LRT vehicle traffic that would be in conflict with LRT is sole-occupant is entirely false.And I'd suggest that you look up traffic count data to get a better sense of who's really getting priority...and where.I'm done with you on this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbigtex56 Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 LOL Literally.From HAIF Guidelines:What is Discouraged: Posting messages just to raise one's total post count. Messages that are little more than "Me, too!" Unsubstantiated claims. Trolling. Flaming. Blatant commercial or promotional postings.You're right, of course. But, you gotta admit, it was funny.I probably should also reprimand those who refer to you as "The Pedant". No one's perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 Since my warning was ignored, this thread is closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.