Jump to content

CaptainJilliams

Full Member
  • Posts

    453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CaptainJilliams

  1. 1 hour ago, brunsonpark08 said:

    I’m thinking studio movie grill or a boutique Cinemark like the woodlands market street. A six screen or so playing a mix of hits and art house. Praying to the heavens it’s an Alamo Drafthouse.

     

    An Alamo Drafthouse inside the loop would be fantastic.

    • Like 4
  2. On 7/2/2019 at 9:04 AM, HoustonMidtown said:

     

    I saw this story, these new rules have me very worried for our neighbors in the north. We've always joked about Austin being "New California", but it seems as though they are failing to learn from homeless situations on the west coast.

     

    • Like 3
  3. I agree with Crock on this one. Sure, it's the former site of the Spaghetti Warehouse, but it's transforming into a completely new concept.

     

    The actual Spaghetti Warehouse (Warehouse 72), is outside the 610 loop. It's good info to know, but it doesn't make much sense to include that information on a thread for a restoration.

    • Like 2
  4. 7 minutes ago, Triton said:

     

    Just wish the facade had more glass, like they planned to do at 800 Bell:

     

    Image result for 800 bell renovations

     

    They should at least do something with the plaza. It's wide open and serves no purpose right now.

     

     

     

    Man I hope they kick-off the renovation of 800 Bell within the next couple years.

    • Like 4
  5. 11 hours ago, samagon said:

     

    Why should he (or any group that provides opposition) need to present any alternatives?

     

     

    ...well, considering the city's continued growth, the deterioration of current infrastructure, and current traffic problems that will only be exacerbated by an influx of people/business, the current set-up will be inadequate for future generations. Considering how car-centric of a city Houston is, we can't simply assume people are going to start relying more on public transportation or that the highway in its current state can get the job done better than a reroute or major overhaul.

     

    Now this isn't to say I agree with every part of TxDot's vision for i-45, far from it, especially the hefty price tag that comes with it. But this continued catastrophizing mentality when it comes to new construction projects is starting to get old. Alternatives are a necessity given the current highway system won't last forever. Regardless of how anyone feels about the situation, something will eventually need to be done. All this talk is procrastination, it's not beneficial or constructive discussion. Speck and other groups need to provide alternatives to fix the very real problems we deal with everyday on our highways, instead of spouting off hyperbolic nonsense. It's even more frustrating when Speck, a non-native to Houston who will likely never live here, comes in with a mentality of "you're wrong, let me show you how you are wrong" and offers little to no solutions. 

       

    11 hours ago, samagon said:

     

    There are lots of possible alternatives, none that TXDOT are pursuing...

     

     

    I would love to hear these alternatives, I've heard very few from the camp protesting the project. At least with an alternative we can iron out the kinks in TxDot's plan and potentially lower the price tag associated with the project.

     

    11 hours ago, samagon said:

    There once was a time when 225 was supposed to come inside the loop and connect to 59, the opposition provided no other alternative other than do nothing. and it has worked for over 30 years. there is a community called the east end that has thrived because of that decision to do nothing.

     

    I'm not quite following the logic that suggests "doing nothing" leads to "thriving". I think there are several levels of factors at play when it comes to determining how different areas grow. It would be far to simplistic to suggest that it was only blocking the 225 project that allowed the East End to experience so much success. Furthermore, you are attempting to apply a single case from 30 years ago to the current situation today, suggesting it would produce the same results.

     

    Correlation does not imply causation.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...