Jump to content

rechlin

Full Member
  • Posts

    855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by rechlin

  1. I agree this would be fantastic, if it goes down Center as @Avossos said, instead of Washington. There are no good east-west alternative roads to Washington, so if the rail went down that, it would slow down traffic (bicycle, automotive, etc) way too much. It's OK that rail went down Main because drivers and cyclists can always take roads like Travis and Fannin. But with Washington, there is no good alternative. And yes, it should ultimately go at least to Shepherd, and maybe all the way to Westcott, and then somehow eventually make it up to the Northwest Transit Center, perhaps via Old Katy Road.
  2. I'm pretty sure they did it that way on the Travis side right by the garage to slow pedestrians as they approach the garage exit/entrance, to minimize the chance of a pedestrian getting run over by a car. You don't want joggers going full speed by a blind exit (yes, motorists should drive slowly and pay attention to where they are going, but who are we kidding? This is Houston, where even the Chief of Police runs over a pedestrian in a crosswalk downtown...).
  3. Already a thread for it here: And now, if nothing is being done with this lot (not even parking), it's even more of a pity that this historic tree was torn down just 3 years ago:
  4. It doesn't seem like anyone is suggesting the government should force anyone to develop something. The idea of property taxes being shifted to more land-based and less improvement-based is not a new concept, or an illiberal concept. Land is scarce and finite; improvement is not. Because taxes can be seen as a discouragement to do certain things, it makes sense that it's in the public interest to focus more on taxing the land than the improvement. The Economist newspaper has advocated for this, too, as I recall. To avoid vacant properties from increasing sprawl, which makes costs go up for everyone, some jurisdictions charge higher taxes for some vacant properties, too. This is all a system of encouragement; nobody is forcing anything. The Regent Square property has been a blight on central Houston for a long time now -- a giant fenced off field that is serving no use to anybody, aside from a small amount of vacant-land property taxes being paid. Perhaps it would make sense for Texas to charge higher property tax rates on vacant or unused urban properties (like Regent Square and the old Holiday Inn downtown) to minimize blight and encourage investment.
  5. Original story which avoids paywall here: https://www.khou.com/article/traffic/another-lane-closure-expect-even-more-delays-on-the-610-west-loop-for-the-next-six-weeks/285-de942a27-ec4f-4985-b1c9-8d517a82c8b9
  6. The blank walls on the parking garage podiums look like Randall Davis's contributions to the project.
  7. And there will be almost no need for a pedestrian bridge here if they ever finish building the White Oak Bayou trail from the east to connect with the M-K-T/Heights trail. That one little gap in the trail for so many years has perplexed me.
  8. Dirt work is finally almost done. Over the last month, they excavated under where the foundation will be, filled in with new dirt, and hauled away the old dirt. I'm guessing foundation work will start soon. Photos taken this morning and Tuesday evening from bus 65:
  9. I was browsing the web and came across this beautiful 1951 photo of the Petroleum Building:
  10. No, that's Block 95. Block 97 is between the Hess Garage and the Fulbright Garage.
  11. I have a white TPO roof on my house, and all it really takes to keep clean is about once a year during a heavy rainstorm, go up there and sponge the dirt loose and let the rain wash it away. Or haul a hose up there and wash it off. You could pressure wash it, but you'd want the pressure set low so you don't damage the membrane.
  12. After slowly laying bricks for what seems like a year, it looks like they've finally pretty much finished the brickwork around the fountains. Not pictured -- the concrete for the sidewalk along Main has finally mostly been poured:
  13. Escalator wing now totally gone:
  14. 15-25 years ago it was considered bad form, yes, but not illegal. Bandwidth was expensive back then so that made sense. But now bandwidth is dirt cheap. Back in the early 2000s I used to spend $1000/month, just in bandwidth costs alone, hosting my web site. Now I get more bandwidth than I could ever need (plus hosting!) for $10/month. Web etiquette has changed, and avoiding infringing on copyrights is now more important than the obsolete 1990s ideas of netiquette.
  15. If you "hotlink" images (a direct link to the original source that is serving the images with the copyright holder's permission, without rehosting the images) in your post, to continue the earlier analogy, it's like leaving a copy of Houstonia magazine out in public, open to a particular page, and telling people to look at that page. If you rehost images (copying them to another site for serving the image, like imgur.com) and link those instead in your post, it's like photocopying the copy of Houstonia magazine and telling people to look at that. I believe the former case is not in any way a copyright violation, since you've copied nothing. The only exception would be if the original source is hosting them illegally, in which case there might be a problem with linking to illegal content, but then the copyright holder should be shutting it down at the source instead. The latter case could possibly be considered fair use, but it's a gray area and may indeed be a copyright violation. That's why, if you want to avoid copyright concerns, you should hotlink. But because sites frequently go down, causing the images to no longer be made available even though the copyright holder is fine with them being shared, rehosting can be a better option if it can be considered fair use. In the Drewery Place example, some images were hotlinked, which should be legal since they were pointing to the original source published by the copyright holder, and some images were rehosted, which the copyright holder said was illegal (though might have actually been fair use -- but that's up for debate and would need a court to decide). But all images were removed, probably in the interest in avoiding any conflict rather than just trying to satisfy any legal requirements. I am not a lawyer, though, so take this with a grain of salt.
  16. To be fair, a BRT bus is indeed almost as good as light rail. In fact, a lot of subway systems (I've seen it in Mexico City and I think Paris, too) use rubber-tired vehicles for their subways. The main advantage of rail is bigger vehicles than BRT allows, but we are limited by block lengths here so even our double-car rail isn't a whole lot bigger than BRT buses. The other main advantages of rail are theoretically lower maintenance costs and usually a smoother ride.
  17. From https://www.bizjournals.com/houston/news/2019/04/22/houston-developer-to-buy-land-near-washington-ave.html:
  18. Hopefully this means they'll finally replace the two broken windows on one of the upper floors that have been broken for 1.5 years (since October 2017).
×
×
  • Create New...