hindesky Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 (edited) Planning commission approved the off street parking. Urban Genesis representative was asked if these are all HHA housing but he said it was half market priced and the other half is based on income. Edited January 20, 2023 by hindesky 2 Quote
Amlaham Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 Is the off street parking just for the construction crew? Then they'll remove it? Quote
hindesky Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 27 minutes ago, Amlaham said: Is the off street parking just for the construction crew? Then they'll remove it? It's for the tenants of the two buildings. Quote
Amlaham Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 11 minutes ago, hindesky said: It's for the tenants of the two buildings. Oh ok, I was just confused by the second to the last slide that said off street parking would eventually be replaced by additional landscape Quote
004n063 Posted February 5, 2023 Posted February 5, 2023 On 1/20/2023 at 11:16 AM, Amlaham said: Oh ok, I was just confused by the second to the last slide that said off street parking would eventually be replaced by additional landscape That's from the Shepherd/Durham reconstruction, I believe. Part of the Memorial Heights TIRZ. 1 Quote
hindesky Posted February 26, 2023 Posted February 26, 2023 Notice the Broadstone Beall and PDG Heights tower cranes in the background. 6 Quote
Triton Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 On 2/12/2023 at 4:33 PM, hindesky said: The city really needs to improve the neighborhood streets in this area. No doubt, this likely looks like the same back country road that it was when it was first laid down 100 years ago. Now it just has some extra asphalt on top. 3 Quote
004n063 Posted March 10, 2023 Posted March 10, 2023 4 hours ago, Triton said: The city really needs to improve the neighborhood streets in this area. No doubt, this likely looks like the same back country road that it was when it was first laid down 100 years ago. Now it just has some extra asphalt on top. I agree, but hesitantly. There's a long history of street "improvements" just leading to higher speeds and greater danger for all users. Doesn't have to be this way (the area of Montrose between Alabama and Richmond, east of Montrose Blvd is dreamy), but I'd want to see the plans before supporting street reconstruction in the Heights. Quote
jmitch94 Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 They could improve this street while not widening it. 2 Quote
004n063 Posted March 11, 2023 Posted March 11, 2023 1 hour ago, jmitch94 said: They could improve this street while not widening it. Oh certainly. Like I said, I'm really impressed with the street reconstructions in that southeast corner of Montrose. But - and I could be wrong about this - I think that actually may depend on the street design codes. Certain lane widths may be legally mandated as a part of any reconstruction. Somebody else here would surely know better than I do, though. Quote
hindesky Posted March 12, 2023 Posted March 12, 2023 They are going to rebuild both N. Shepherd and Durham Dr. When they do it will have a bike path on it. They are currently working on both streets south of here and just north of Tommie Vaughn Ford working north to 610. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.