Jeebus Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 It's on the news right now. I'll post a link if they put it on their website.Excerpt From Newscast:-A girl who works in a "luxury" store in the Galleria admits that she let a man with a Red Cross debit card purchase a $250.00 bracelet.Red Cross admits that there is a high amount of Red Cross issued debit card abuse, but they claim to be helpless over it.-..I have to say though, after watching the report, that the girl ought to be ashamed of herself for selling the bracelet - as much as the man who bought it. Quote
nmainguy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 It's on the news right now. I'll post a link if they put it on their website.Excerpt From Newscast:-A girl who works in a "luxury" store in the Galleria admits that she let a man with a Red Cross debit card purchase a $250.00 bracelet.Red Cross admits that there is a high amount of Red Cross issued debit card abuse, but they claim to be helpless over it.-..I have to say though, after watching the report, that the girl ought to be ashamed of herself for selling the bracelet - as much as the man who bought it.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>And what would be her legal standing in refusing to make a sale to a paying customer? Quote
Jeebus Posted September 14, 2005 Author Posted September 14, 2005 And what would be her legal standing in refusing to make a sale to a paying customer?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Not legal ground - but rather moral. The business had the right to say no, but chose to sell the bracelet anyway. So maybe I shouldn't blame the girl - but the whole business. Quote
nmainguy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Not legal ground - but rather moral. The business had the right to say no, but chose to sell the bracelet anyway. So maybe I shouldn't blame the girl - but the whole business.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote
RedScare Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 I agree with Jeebus. The sales girl could have refused. But, instead, it sounds like she sold the merchandise, knowing it was improper, only to call the media to brag about it, making her only slightly less unethical than the evacuee who abused our generosity.Having said this, it doesn't change my opinion about my donations. I make my donations knowing full well that some will not appreciate it, and others will not make the best use of it. That is human nature. We cannot save everyone from themselves...nor should we. Quote
Jeebus Posted September 14, 2005 Author Posted September 14, 2005 Having said this, it doesn't change my opinion about my donations. I make my donations knowing full well that some will not appreciate it, and others will not make the best use of it. That is human nature. We cannot save everyone from themselves...nor should we.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>You're right about the donations. I guess I am a little too bitter over the Red Cross thing. Still, I hope that everyone would research the charity they intend to give, and ensure that their charity will use the donations as intended. Quote
RedScare Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 You're right about researching your charities. Myself, I haven't donated to United Way in over 15 years, ever since their executive payroll scandal. Quote
N Judah Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 My favorites are the ones clogging up the line at the local Spec's using their FEMA money (not the debit cards, the money) to buy bottles of Johnny Walker. And they have the nerve to ask if they can get a "Louisiana discount." Quote
pineda Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 You know, if I had lost EVERYTHING, and had been evacuated from my home with no clear timeframe if and when I could ever return, was living in a crowded, noisy shelter with constant noise and distractions everywhere, no privacy, didn't know STILL where some of my family members were, was a little frustrated because I couldn't get any money from my local bank account, was tired of dealing with insurance agents and other government types, wearing used, ill-fitting clothing, eating food I wasn't used to, and someone gave me $2000.00, I MIGHT think going over to a local liquor store to buy some hooch was a good way to mellow out for a while, and hopefully the residents of the community where I was staying, would be sympathetic and compassionate enough to understand this desire. No, it's not a basic need, and maybe it's not right that I spend my government's money this way, but at the time, it might seem like a good idea. Quote
KatieDidIt Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 It's on the news right now. I'll post a link if they put it on their website.Excerpt From Newscast:-A girl who works in a "luxury" store in the Galleria admits that she let a man with a Red Cross debit card purchase a $250.00 bracelet.Red Cross admits that there is a high amount of Red Cross issued debit card abuse, but they claim to be helpless over it.-..I have to say though, after watching the report, that the girl ought to be ashamed of herself for selling the bracelet - as much as the man who bought it.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Geezz, maybe the man bought it for his wife/girlfriend/daughter or mom. When you loose EVERYTHING of value and importance, something like that means a lot. It will probably be something she charishes forever. What's wrong with having a little beauty and a little something in a time of ugliness?When you donate your money its gone. If you want to put stipulations on your contrubution you should give items, not cash. I gave three bags of new Nordstrom brand outfits in different sizes. With quality shoes and purses. Something a person could start a life with, get an office job with. Yeah, it was a little bit of luxury, but these people lost not only their basics, but things that made their lives liveable. Quote
RedScare Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 My favorites are the ones clogging up the line at the local Spec's using their FEMA money (not the debit cards, the money) to buy bottles of Johnny Walker. And they have the nerve to ask if they can get a "Louisiana discount." <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Was it Johnny Red or Black label? Quote
midtown_resident Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 who cares?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>AMEN! Quote
HeightsGuy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Whatever, if I went through what they went through, I'd be getting my drink on too! Quote
Jeebus Posted September 14, 2005 Author Posted September 14, 2005 Whatever, if I went through what they went through, I'd be getting my drink on too!<{POST_SNAPBACK}>The difference is that you probably weren't chronically getting your "drink on" everyday prior to Katrina, as they most likely were. Quote
midtown_resident Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 The difference is that you probably weren't chronically getting your "drink on" everyday prior to Katrina, as they most likely were.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>That's an awfully sweeping statement! Can you support that argument? Quote
MidtownCoog Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 I get my "drink on" all the time, and I work in an Ivory Tower downtown.Is it 5:00 yet? Quote
HeightsGuy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 There are about 4000 residents in the Reliant complex now, and much more than that in the past week(s). Most do not have any access to vehicles, so of course the nearest liquor store will get a bulk of that business.In the US population, I think you can count on 5% being alcoholics, and if I'm not mistaken about 60% of the US population drinks alcohol. So, even if you had a few hundred people in line at the nearest liquor store to the Reliant complex to get their "johnny Walker", that's still a small statistical number. So please, tell me how you're backing up your sweeping statement???? Quote
Guest danax Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Just some more hearsay from someone who was at the Galleria this last weekend shopping with his wife; the store clerk at one shop said she had sold hundreds of very expensive Tourneau watches with the debit cards. She told him it was like Christmas.Anyone know why they switched from debit cards to straight deposits into bank accounts? I was told this was done but no explanation was given. Could they have been trying to avoid public relations backlash from reports of non-essential purchases? Quote
nmainguy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 QUOTE(Jeebus @ Wednesday, September 14th, 2005 @ 10:09am) The difference is that you probably weren't chronically getting your "drink on" everyday prior to Katrina, as they most likely were. That's an awfully sweeping statement! Can you support that argument? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Jeebus is an absolute master at sweeping statements. Quote
bachanon Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 redscare said: Having said this, it doesn't change my opinion about my donations. I make my donations knowing full well that some will not appreciate it, and others will not make the best use of it. That is human nature. We cannot save everyone from themselves...nor should we. the mark of a true giver. Quote
MidtownCoog Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 FWIW, there is a liquor store at the corner of Murworth and Main, right next to Timmy Chan's.I think I'll go buy some lushes a drink today. Kinda reminds me of watching the flood waters move into my town home during Allision. First thing I said to my wife was "where's the shot glass? we are going to need it". Quote
nmainguy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 FWIW, there is a liquor store at the corner of Murworth and Main, right next to Timmy Chan's.I think I'll go buy some lushes a drink today. Kinda reminds me of watching the flood waters move into my town home during Allision. First thing I said to my wife was "where's the shot glass? we are going to need it". <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Allison...geez louise...we dispensed with the shot glass and went straight to the bottle. Quote
west20th Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Allison...geez louise...we dispensed with the shot glass and went straight to the bottle. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I remember getting stranded at the Outpost during Allison. Could't leave until the next AM. The alcohol sure helped. Quote
RedScare Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 The difference is that you probably weren't chronically getting your "drink on" everyday prior to Katrina, as they most likely were.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I most certainly do!Funny thing is, Jeebus, virtually every study and survey I've ever seen shows that whites use and abuse both alcohol and drugs at higher percentages than blacks. So there is likely no more evacuees "getting their drink on" than a similar white population would.Besides, after the hell they went through, my question is, why haven't they drank more? Quote
Jeebus Posted September 14, 2005 Author Posted September 14, 2005 Funny thing is, Jeebus, virtually every study and survey I've ever seen shows that whites use and abuse both alcohol and drugs at higher percentages than blacks. So there is likely no more evacuees "getting their drink on" than a similar white population would.Besides, after the hell they went through, my question is, why haven't they drank more?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Considering that whites make up over double what blacks make in the population, I don't see how you could ever find more blacks that do anything more than whites.That's why blacks are the minority.. remember? Quote
nmainguy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Considering that whites make up over double what blacks make in the population, I don't see how you could ever find more blacks that do anything more than whites.That's why blacks are the minority.. remember? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, Red! 'member? Quote
west20th Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Considering that whites make up over double what blacks make in the population, I don't see how you could ever find more blacks that do anything more than whites.That's why blacks are the minority.. remember?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>He meant as a percentage of their population not total numbers. Quote
KatieDidIt Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Was Allison that storm back in 2001 that gave my house mold and forced my family to live in an apartment for 6 months, with a toddler and 15 year old dog that had to pee 35 times a day? I can't remember, I was hammered. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.