Jump to content

jt16

Full Member
  • Posts

    598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by jt16

  1. I've heard they are only doing the first deck on the east side so they could keep the same amount of student seats. A tear down and rebuild would have meant moving seating to current code of 24" vs 18" separation and less seats on the student side. We really are a fatter society.

    Also, when the east side stands were demolished that dirt hasn't seen sunlight since the 20s.

  2. I'm in Two Allen.  The buildings are actually fairly efficient office space and they are having some success renting to multi-tenant floors.  The problem is they lost (Hess, Devon, Kinder Morgan) all in the span of a few years.  That's pretty devastating.  The leasing claimed that One Allen is the only building getting a redo.  I'm sure it's possible, but I'm looking at fairly large stone on the exterior of the building right now, and a glass facade seems really tricky and expensive.

  3. The renderings are definitely cartoonish but it does look like fun. They remind me of the poster maps one could get at Six Flags or Astroworld back in the day.

     

    It's kind of hard to have renderings of 600 acre park without making it cartoonish.  Otherwise your renderings would show very little of the overall plan, or you would have way too many of them to really get people interested.  I think what I see looks like a good plan. 

    • Like 1
  4. We can't pretend that the Dome meant more than that? The NY Times a few months ago called it "the most important, distinctive and influential stadium ever built in the United States." It tripled the world record for longest unsupported roof span. The LA Times yesterday called for it to be saved. The referendum results today are being covered in almost every national media outlet. The whole country is trying to tell us that "the Dome meant more than that"; why are we refusing to listen?

     

    As to Italy, they make nice money off of tourism for their historic monuments, although I believe if you ask them, they probably see a value in those monuments that can't be boiled down to how much money they take in. They have a word for this mindset - barbarismo.

     

    Then come up with a plan that isn't asking everyone else to pay for it.  If it's so important to all these people, money would be pouring in from preservationists.  But it clearly isn't. 

  5. Supposed to be redesigning the lobby to be more open and glass (like the redo of El Paso building is how the leasing manager described to me). I don't remember but may also be trying to redo to make the lobby street level instead of on the 2nd floor in the current layout.

  6. So Vik, are you saying that if I build a great building that people love, I shouldn't be able to tear it down 30 years later if I get tired of it? That seems pretty much like telling Bob Dylan he couldn't play electric guitar instead of acoustic.

    That's why I hate the "community" liberals have created. It usually means a small minority are going to try and bully the masses into what they tell you is good for you. This new concept of community is just an erosion of personal freedom.

  7. Wow! I've never seen this many people sign up. This may be a fun year. For all you new guys, don't let sowanome fool you. She may be a girl, but she always kicks our butts!

    Good luck to everyone.

    No kidding. I feel good that I picked the exact same winners she did but got waxed on the confidence points.

  8. So that square on the roof of the garage rendering is where the tower will go? I hope they don't shorten it from the 38 story plan

    At this point, just the old Texaco building reno is a big win. The additional tower is icing on the cake. I don't think anyone here would have put money on that building surviving five years ago.

×
×
  • Create New...