editor Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Metro is getting $50 million from the feds to expand rail in Houston. I'd paste the press release here, but for some reason, instead of sending out the release as actual text, it came as a typed sheet of paper scanned into a document that was then turned into a PDF. I guess there must be a new intern.METRO TO RECEIVE $50 MILLION FOR RAIL EXPANSION.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatesdisastr Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Well that sounds like good news. Hopefully the NEW Metro will be more responsible and allow better transparency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrLan34 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Well that sounds like good news. Hopefully the NEW Metro will be more responsible and allow better transparency.This would have been even better news had it not already been budgeted for 2011. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I think METRO should be proactive and go after the rail money that the newly elected Tea Party Republicans turned down in Wisconsin and Ohio (hundreds of millions of dollars for high-speed rail was earmarked for those states and the new Governors TURNED IT DOWN). Lets turn their idiocy into our rail! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I think METRO should be proactive and go after the rail money that the newly elected Tea Party Republicans turned down in Wisconsin and Ohio (hundreds of millions of dollars for high-speed rail was earmarked for those states and the new Governors TURNED IT DOWN). Lets turn their idiocy into our rail!Is that what happened? I thought it was strange that construction is underway on the HSR link between Chicago and Saint Louis (259 miles), while the link to Milwaukee (86 miles) hasn't. I guess the mystery is solved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Wow, this will help build about 500 ft of light rail, woohoo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 Wow, this will help build about 500 ft of light rail, woohoo! Considering how little people in Houston like the idea of walking, every foot helps! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Is that what happened? I thought it was strange that construction is underway on the HSR link between Chicago and Saint Louis (259 miles), while the link to Milwaukee (86 miles) hasn't. I guess the mystery is solved.Does that mean that Amtrak's 'Spirit of New Orleans' is about to get cut back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 If METRO is smart, they'll somehow get the money to buses and route planning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 In Wisconsin, Governor-elect Walker (Tea Party) turned away $810 MILLION in federal stimulus money for a light rail line connecting Milwaukee and Madison. It's rumored that the Spanish company that had promised to build a train car facility in Wisconsin has now backed out of the deal. Estimates are that over 5,500 future jobs just vanished.In Ohio, Governor-elect Kasich (Tea Party) announced that he would kill the rail plan to connect Cleveland to Columbus and then on to Cincinnati. He asked the Feds to use the $400 MILLION alloted to Ohio for highway projects. The Feds told him to beat it.Unfortunately, it looks like that $1.2 BILLION has already been given to California, Florida, Washington, and a few other states. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 In Wisconsin, Governor-elect Walker (Tea Party) turned away $810 MILLION in federal stimulus money for a light rail line connecting Milwaukee and Madison. It's rumored that the Spanish company that had promised to build a train car facility in Wisconsin has now backed out of the deal. Estimates are that over 5,500 future jobs just vanished.In Ohio, Governor-elect Kasich (Tea Party) announced that he would kill the rail plan to connect Cleveland to Columbus and then on to Cincinnati. He asked the Feds to use the $400 MILLION alloted to Ohio for highway projects. The Feds told him to beat it.Unfortunately, it looks like that $1.2 BILLION has already been given to California, Florida, Washington, and a few other states.I'm not saying that these guys in Wisconsin and Ohio aren't utterly insane (even Ron Paul knows better than to turn away pork), but I have absolutely no faith in the estimates regarding job creation either. Your argument is perfectly fine on the face of it, without inflated jobs estimates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 Does that mean that Amtrak's 'Spirit of New Orleans' is about to get cut back?No, it just means that the City of New Orleans will run faster on that stretch of the route, as it won't have to wait for the freight bottlenecks at the Mississippi River in Alton, and the one further north near Joliet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 No, it just means that the City of New Orleans will run faster on that stretch of the route, as it won't have to wait for the freight bottlenecks at the Mississippi River in Alton, and the one further north near Joliet. Once this project is complete, perhaps some insightful rap artist can splice in a higher-tempo sequence to Willie Nelson's classic song. Yeah...that'll sound fantastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 I'm not saying that these guys in Wisconsin and Ohio aren't utterly insane (even Ron Paul knows better than to turn away pork), but I have absolutely no faith in the estimates regarding job creation either. Your argument is perfectly fine on the face of it, without inflated jobs estimates.Actually, the Dems up in Wisconsin have been stating that 13,000 jobs will be lost. The 5,500 figure I came up with was a conservative estimate based upon this;http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statementsclick on the 2nd link. I actually even undershot the politifact estimates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
editor Posted December 17, 2010 Author Share Posted December 17, 2010 Actually, the Dems up in Wisconsin have been stating that 13,000 jobs will be lost. The 5,500 figure I came up with was a conservative estimate based upon this;http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statementsclick on the 2nd link. I actually even undershot the politifact estimates.Are these jobs "lost" in the real world, or in politics where "not created"="lost?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 No, it just means that the City of New Orleans will run faster on that stretch of the route, as it won't have to wait for the freight bottlenecks at the Mississippi River in Alton, and the one further north near Joliet.Probably not, since the City of New Orleans runs on a completely different route than the CHI/STL route. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Actually, the Dems up in Wisconsin have been stating that 13,000 jobs will be lost. The 5,500 figure I came up with was a conservative estimate based upon this;http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statementsclick on the 2nd link. I actually even undershot the politifact estimates.There are two categories of stakeholders on this issue: Wisconsiners and Americans. Since the funding for HSR is already allocated to that purpose, this decision has absolutely no effect on the average American. As for Wisconsin, the effect is two-fold: they don't get the benefits of the project and they lose share of allocated federal funds.The jobs argument is highly suspect, a blip on the radar. First of all, as Politifact points out, most of the jobs are temporary and construction-related. Many of the jobs would not entail full time employment or will be seasonal. And the big caveat is that a lot of the jobs will involve off-site out-of-state regulatory, engineering, and pre-fabrictation activity. (OTOH, even if Wisconsin loses out on a big construction project, this means that some nominal number of Wisconsiners will probably still be involved in HSR construction, somewhere in the world.)Unfortunately, not many states have economic development programs so sophisticated (or intellectually honest) that accurately measuring economic impact is attempted. And none of the economic development consultants that generate these expensive reports use a standard set of methodology, meaning that there is no such thing as an apples-to-apples comparison. These figures have no relationship with or any bearing on BLS data, are designed for a special interest to justify outside investment, and should be disregarded completely and absolutely in the political realm. The data is garbage! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Houston19514 Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 There are two categories of stakeholders on this issue: Wisconsiners and Americans. Since the funding for HSR is already allocated to that purpose, this decision has absolutely no effect on the average American. As for Wisconsin, the effect is two-fold: they don't get the benefits of the project and they lose share of allocated federal funds.Good analysis, Niche, except that the effect on Wisconsin is more than two-fold. You forgot the effect of the costs Wisconsin taxpayers would have to pay for the project in operating and maintenance costs (and possibly in funding any cost overruns in construction costs, not that federally funded construction projects ever have cost overruns). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockmat Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Good analysis, Niche, except that the effect on Wisconsin is more than two-fold. You forgot the effect of the costs Wisconsin taxpayers would have to pay for the project in operating and maintenance costs (and possibly in funding any cost overruns in construction costs, not that federally funded construction projects ever have cost overruns).I was about to say the same thing, good point. They would have been throwing money in the garbage basically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNiche Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Good analysis, Niche, except that the effect on Wisconsin is more than two-fold. You forgot the effect of the costs Wisconsin taxpayers would have to pay for the project in operating and maintenance costs (and possibly in funding any cost overruns in construction costs, not that federally funded construction projects ever have cost overruns).Yeah, I should've used the phrase "net benefits of the project" rather than simply "benefits of the project". That number could be a negative, but I don't feel like making that a battleground issue from which we'd undoubtedly stray off topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.