MidtownCoog Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 And, just to rub salt in the wound, the Craig scandal has brought the David Vitter matter back to the fore, since no Republicans demanded that a prostitute visiting Senator resign, only the gay sex Senator.Well of course not. A money exchange for straight-sex in PRIVATE vs. crusing for sex in a public bathroom?Some people need to learn a lesson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KinkaidAlum Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 So what about all the homosexuals who cruise Club Houston, Venture Inn and all the other nasty places on that certain Web site that gay men surf? Does that make them homo-latent?Eh, you'd be surprised by how many married men are at places like that. Sure, there are gay guys there too, but it's usually the tweaked out circuit crowd. You sure do know a lot about this stuff, Senator.Well of course not. A money exchange for straight-sex in PRIVATE vs. crusing for sex in a public bathroom?Some people need to learn a lesson.Uh, last time I checked, both were illegal. Of course, in this country, most Johns get off easy...That's what you call a Lib trying to distance him self from the debate. Lets talk about Barney Frank...Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think Barney Frank was "out" when that terd hit the fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Marty Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Come on Kinkaid, If your are gay your gay, I thought that a person that ran a porno store (you said that you did a while back ) should be able to tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalparadise Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Once again -- the only person who has made this a gay issue is Craig himself, with his "I'm not gay!" speech. It's as if peeping and soliciting in a public restroom -- which he freely copped to -- was okay, just so long as no one knew he's gay. As soon as that part got out, it was a "witch hunt".Well guess what, he wasn't arrested for being gay. Only Idaho newspapers, other Republicans and he seem to care about that point. There's nothing wrong or illegal about being gay (in most states, anyway). So what should we believe? He is a freaky glory-hole perv, and isn't a well-adjusted, law-abiding gay man? Okay, I guess I do believe him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.