Jump to content

mfastx

Full Member
  • Posts

    1,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by mfastx

  1. 19 hours ago, Heights88 said:

    Struggling with the regret for light rail to be built here. Do we consider the green, purple, and red line LRT extensions a success? Ridership on these new lines has been pretty abysmal (even controlling for effects of the pandemic). 

    University Line BRT construction is already estimated at $84MM per mile. Building light rail here would likely require at least triple the investment per mile for little to no incremental return.

    Part of my regret comes from the fact that I believe they did it backwards. This and the uptown corridor definitely warranted rail, while the east side lines were more suited to BRT, in my opinion. 

    I disagree that there would be no incremental return. Substantially higher ridership and lower subsidy per passenger on an operational basis definitely qualifies in my opinion. Higher capacity is a plus too - the system can be in place for decades longer without needing capacity upgrades. And then the economic benefits with LRT outweigh BRT, although I'll grant that it's not THAT much more benefits (substantially higher benefits come from HRT which unfortunately will probably never be built in Houston). 

    • Like 2
  2. Looks cool. It is a massive disappointment that Metro is having to settle for BRT instead of at least LRT for this corridor. BRT will generate less ridership, require a higher operating subsidy per person (although with less initial capital costs) and generate less economic development/benefits for the city. Thank you Culberson. 

    I still hope that this will be more successful than the Silver line which hasn't done well at all. Maybe after it's connected to this it'll do better. 

  3. 15 hours ago, Heights88 said:

    It's not that rail is not relevant or too old a technology (but that is also kind of true)...it's that it's just not even close to being cost effective. These light rail projects cost $200-500MM per mile (conservative estimates)...highway projects move more people at less than half the cost of rail. The choo choo fans on this board need to come to grips with the fact that cars are far more effective and efficient at moving people to and from decentralized population/job centers. 

    Do you have a source for this? 

    • Like 1
  4. 20 hours ago, Ross said:

    Those parking lots will get replaced when developers think it is economic to build something. If you replaced all of them with a building over the next 2 eyars, most of the buildings would be empty, as there's not enough demand for the space.

    I'm aware but thank you lol. 

    Hopefully the 59 project will increase demand in that area and around MMP. 

×
×
  • Create New...