Jump to content

JLWM8609

Full Member
  • Posts

    2,418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by JLWM8609

  1. I realize this is conceptual, and I'm not sure if this was covered earlier in the thread, but this video shows a potential multimodal station with elevated lanes called a REAL Station placed on part of the Pierce Elevated ROW. I think this is a good idea, but isn't the whole reason for moving 45 to eliminate an elevated structure? You can look a little further and see what looks like a connection to the connector ramps that will feed into downtown from the relocated I-45. Does this mean that TxDOT is planning to redevelop the old Pierce Elevated ROW into another type of elevated road structure, and thus keep an elevated road barrier between Downtown and Midtown?

     

  2. Going by the latest rendering, I guess they're going to build over the remaining RR spur that ran behind Grocer's Supply and replace it with a road? That's too bad. I always thought that would be a good route for a commuter rail line from Pearland, and Levit Green would've been an ideal spot for a Medical Center station with a bus tie-in to the TMC campus. They could've shifted the Columbia Tap trail alignment somewhat to put rail back since the ROW is preserved all the way to the edge of Downtown.

    • Like 5
  3. On 12/8/2021 at 4:09 PM, Big E said:

    It wasn't just rich people though. Many of the exact same urban interests, including the infamous Sheila Jackson-Lee, opposed 610's expansion and killed that project. Saying it was just "rich white people" who opposed it is simply not true. And 610 has suffered for it ever since.

    Who's to say 610 wouldn't still be suffering if they'd gone ahead with the project? The project was killed in the early 90s. Had 610 been expanded as planned in the mid 90s, its not unreasonable to think it would be congested again 25 years later in 2021. Just look at the Katy Freeway. 

  4. On 9/13/2021 at 1:56 PM, WestUdweller said:

    Y'all are both wrong because no one is maintaining them currently haaaa

    The City of Houston has actually been pretty responsive in fixing damaged signal equipment in a timely manner. When I report most traffic signal related issues to 311, they're fixed within 24 hours, unless it's a bigger issue that requires more work. 

    • Like 3
  5. 9 hours ago, mkultra25 said:

    It shouldn't be too much to ask that obtaining a driver's license should require demonstrating some level of proficiency in operating a vehicle instead of just barely adequate competence. This is the case in many other countries. But that ship sailed when the majority of people began regarding driving as a right as opposed to a privilege. 

    Take into consideration that in a car centered city like Houston, driving is sometimes the only option in areas where transit is non existent or sparse. In that case, it's not a privilege when you're forced into it. 

    • Like 2
  6. On 8/26/2021 at 2:24 PM, wilcal said:

    FWIW, TXDOT maintains Westheimer west of 610. Pretty sure that includes the lights as well.  

    The City of Houston maintains just about all traffic signals within the city limits, including those installed by TxDOT and those on TxDOT maintained roads like Westheimer, Almeda, and feeder roads. Exceptions would be ramp meter signals and HOV signals.

    • Thanks 1
  7. 38 minutes ago, dbigtex56 said:

    Good. 
    Having an auto dealership at a light rail stop seems like a wasted resource (who takes the train to shop for a Cadillac?).
    Presumably the inventory will also be relocated, freeing up the private parking lots in Midtown for better uses. 
    If apartments aren't on the immediate horizon, perhaps the showroom could be repurposed for a restaurant, nightclub, or retail.

    People take the train to work there so it's not a wasted resource. The dealership pre-dates the light rail stop by decades. It was formerly Sam White Oldsmobile in the 1950s. It didn't become a Cadillac dealership (Don Massey) until the late 90s when Bland Cadillac shut down and was replaced by Lofts. There was some old school charm about having a dealer so close in town in a vintage building, a domestic dealer at that, imagining the old fintailed 88s and 98s on the showroom floor. San Francisco doesn't have a single domestic car dealership in its city limits. The last one closed in 2011. If you're rich enough to afford to live in SF, a domestic car is beneath you. We still have Knapp Chevy though, still rocking its Art Deco digs in the shadow of downtown, so that's a sign that central Houston isn't that unaffordable. . . yet.

     

    http://swamplot.com/your-next-best-bets-for-houstons-most-historic-car-dealership-building-once-1621-milam-gets-demolished/2018-10-25/

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  8. 8 hours ago, Triton said:

    Drove down 288 for the first time in a while to meet my newborn's pediatrician in TMC and I am so disappointed with this project. 

    Yea, the toll road looks great but usually these sort of projects try to improve the feeders, bridges, sidewalks, etc. The Old Spanish Trail section shows very little sign of improvement except for the ramps to the toll road. The bridges and pedestrian walkways look like could have, at the very least, gotten a new coat of paint. The feeder roads are full of cracks and bumps. This is the first highway project I've seen in a while where they truly didn't care about the residents immediately on this highway in the loop. 

    The only original bridges over 288 to get a new coat of paint during this project were utility bridges. Go figure.

    • Like 4
  9. 6 hours ago, Specwriter said:

    I had a similar thought. My mother lived in the Aldine area in the 1960s and worked at what was then called the Hermann Professional Building on Fannin (directly across from Hermann Hospital). Interstate 45 (U.S. 75) stopped at Pierce so she would take Pierce to Fannin then head toward the medical center. It may be that the part of U.S. 59 that we know today - elevated over San Jacinto, etc. - may not have existed as such in 1962. Can any "older-than-me-timers" weigh in on the freeway configurations at that time.

    I'm not an old timer, but the elevated 59 we know today didn't exist in 1962. In 1962, US 59 followed what's now Spur 527 and ran on Travis and Milam and picked up some east-west streets to connect to the Eastex portion of US 59. I think the routing was Jefferson and Pease to La Branch and Crawford to Franklin and Preston to the Eastex. The elevated part and the connection to the Eastex through downtown didn't open until 1974. 

    Here's a 1962 street map of Houston. You can see how 59 followed street routes downtown to connect the Southwest Freeway with the Eastex.

    https://www.texasfreeway.com/Houston/historic/road_maps/images/1962_houston_american_highres.jpg

    • Like 1
  10. 4 hours ago, Tumbleweed_Tx said:

    the southern end of 130 is 45 miles from San Antonio.

    SH 130 is actually signed along I-410 from I-35 SW of Downtown San Antonio to I-10 east of Downtown San Antonio where it's signed on I-10 to the point where the tollroad picks up outside Seguin. The idea was that truck traffic on I-35 would see the SH 130 sign and bypass San Antonio on SH 130/I-410 and SH 130/I-10 to pick up the tollroad and bypass Austin.

  11. 7 hours ago, dbigtex56 said:

    In that case, give me a heaping double-portion of hot garbage, please. 
    Architecture goes through predictable cycles. This year's glamorous cutting-edge design will be mimicked, poorly, and soon the good examples are thrown out with the bad as laughably out of date. In the 1950's, removing gingerbread and enclosing porches was the popular way of dealing with Victorian architecture. A few years later, MCM houses underwent renovations to make them look more 'traditional'. The favored remedy for Post-Modern seems to be demolition.
    Post-Modern architecture is currently about as welcome as bedbugs, but I assure you that in a few years there will be a resurgence of interest, and people will deplore those who allowed the finer examples to be neglected, poorly altered, or destroyed. 
    I liked the YWCA building when it was built, and still do. Too bad it outlived its purpose.
     

    Luckily, Houston's skyline is full of post-modernity, and I don't think they'll be demolishing any of those buildings anytime soon. Hopefully they don't get any ideas from this: https://gothamist.com/news/270-park-avenue-quintessential-modernist-skyscraper-being-slowly-destroyed-chase-bank

    • Like 3
  12. 3 hours ago, por favor gracias said:

    Don't get me started on how they manage their projects. You think my last few posts have been long...

    The City of Houston did a similar thing when they decided to reconstruct most of downtown's streets and underground utilities at the same time during 1998-2005. Lee Brown faced criticism for that and barely won re-election in 2001 even though he actually stretched out the timeline after he decided too much construction was going on. 15-20 years later, it was worth it. Our reconstructed streets downtown are in excellent condition compared to other cities.

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...