Jump to content

ClutchCity

Full Member
  • Posts

    346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ClutchCity

  1. Yea the Fox coverage alluded to retail and even some residential for the site. It's my understanding that Hilcorp got some tax incentives to include retail in their project to help anchor that retail district they want to make downtown. Doesn't seem like they could fit residential in it if it is only 23 stories though.

  2. Too many spec proposals for DT and not enough tenants it seems. I hope this doesn't get built at the cost of losing 609 Main or the Steam building.

    You seem to be right, because after adding up all the none owner-occupied office buildings proposed it comes out to quite a bit of space:

    800 Bell Redevelopment - 1.3 Mil

    609 Main - 1 Mil

    5 Allen Center - 1 Mil

    International Tower ~ 750k

    Capitol Tower - 700k

    6 Houston Center - 600k

    Since 800 Bell, 609 Main, and 6 Houston Center all looking like they will move forward quickly, that makes for almost 3 mil sf of new space. I'm only guessing that doesn't bode well for International Tower, let alone 5 AC. I agree with Urbannizer that Skanska seems to be moving forward with Capitol Tower ,which could make for 3.6 mil sf under construction in the next couple years, but they sure are dragging their feet. Maybe has something to do with competition downtown and their Galleria tower leasing up slowly?

  3. Think it could have anything to do with the crown? Maybe to show it would have the height of a 46 story building and make Hines' apartment tower look shorter in comparison. Would make their apartment tower look shorter because without it(and the apartment tower now proposed on Block 35) it would be the tallest building for a couple blocks around the park. If not it seems like the floor count of a proposed tower changes every other week.

  4. Here's another article by bisnow that briefly mentions the Marriot Marquis and that, "Preconstruction will last into 2014; look for groundbreaking in Q4 and a 26-month build schedule." Does that mean they will break ground this year but the Q1 construction start that has been previously mentioned is for vertical construction?

    http://www.bisnow.com/commercial-real-estate/houston/the-deal-sheet-hou-091013/

    • Like 2
  5.  

    I'm still wondering how 609 Main will connect to the tunnels, if at all.

     

    From what this article said,"...The building will contain ground-floor retail space and be connected to downtown’s tunnel system through the BG Group Place building and eventually to another high-rise planned to the north of the property." I can only presume the building to the north would be this one. Is it odd that Hines would go through the new Texaco building after it's renovated to connect one of their buildings to the tunnel system? Hines is so tricky.

     

     

    http://blog.chron.com/primeproperty/2013/08/old-texaco-building-getting-a-new-life/#comments

  6. With the residential incentive ending in 2016 there should be at least 2500 units added or under construction by then. Hopefully that means we get some pretty interesting towers! So the residential part of downtown will be be vastly different. It is yet to be seen if it can get it's mojo back to attract office tenants to a shiny 40+ story tower instead of a cheaper building in the burbs.

  7. Was driving down Travis this morning and noticed someone surveying the surface parking lot that takes up the other half of the Savoy's block. Anyone have an idea it's for? Why would they need to survey the whole block for renovations on the already existing building?

    • Like 1
  8. Some confusing but interesting information I found regarding Hines' new tower. They both seem to indicate that it for sure is going forward in early 2014 with PM Realty's report even going as far as to say they were going to go spec. Bisnow's information is confusing because if says, "But the CBD has been stable for the last 15 years. In that time, only four multitenant office towers were built in the submarket, and now there are none under construction and only two slated to break ground before year-end 2014. And those are already 60% pre-committed; Hines' 800k SF tower at 609 Main doesn't have a tenant yet, but Chevron's 50-story tower is owner-occupied." Since Chevron's building is owner-occupied why would they bring it up since it is not multitenant? Even if it was with some quick math, dividing Chevron's 1.7 mil sq ft of occupied space by the 2.5 mil sq ft between the 2 buildings it comes out to 68% occupancy. Unless of course they are only occupying 1.5 mil and renting out another 200k of space for amenities. There's no other way the numbers would add up because it would take both Skanska and Linbeck's projects to be fully occupied to even out Hines since its presumed spec.

    http://www.bisnow.com/commercial-real-estate/houston/is-downtown-a-gateway-market/

    http://downtownhouston.org/site_media/uploads/attachments/2013-08-14/2013-2Q_-_PMRG_Market_at_a_Glance.pdf

    • Like 1
  9. Chevrons even newer tower housing their yet to be announce headquarters relocation? heh, i wish. i wonder what is being planned there though. Chevron currently owns the land i thought? dont they have a day care on that site?

    Since your last two questions are correct I wouldn't be surprised if your first statement is true. Makes sense with what's been happening with their parking garage acquisitions. I hope it brings some more pull to downtown when it comes to corporate relocations/consolidations!

    • Like 1
  10. The rendering above makes it look like the retail will be on the North side of the parking structure, in which case it will face another new apartment building:

    http://www.houstonarchitecture.com/haif/topic/28307-alliance-downtown-5-stories-207-units/

    http://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/real-estate/article/Houston-s-apartment-boom-focuses-on-urban-scene-4619878.php?t=445cfc44ffb05374ef

     

     

    I didn't think about that even though I knew that Alliance was putting up those apartments on the adjacent block. I wonder if that was planned!

  11. I would say even Chevron's tower is better than this one. Sure Midland's tower is taller, but it's just as boxy as Chevron's if not more(Chevron has that groove on the north side  B)). Another thing is location, Chevron's tower is probably going to be the third tallest tower downtown, with very large floor-plates since its 1.7 mil in 50 stories, which I feel will help weigh down the skyline in the south, when looking from the West (if that makes any sense whatsoever). Their's is just the tallest tower they could slap down in Midland because even a 30 story tower would make a huge mark on the skyline. Nothing to be envious of. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...