Rice - Baylor Med Merger
#1
Posted Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 8:24 AM
"Rice University and Baylor College of Medicine have begun holding serious discussions that could lead to a merger of the state's top private university and one of the country's best medical schools.
A merger would bring Rice the reputational enhancement it has long desired and Baylor the security of a university affiliation, which is often necessary to keep medical schools afloat financially. Baylor is one of only nine stand-alone medical schools in the United States."
|
|
#2
Posted Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 8:54 AM
I think a merger would be beneficial for both institutions. Collaborative synergy and joint grant applications could create an even bigger powerhouse in the biomedical sciences.
Moreover, I was interested in the articles mention about concern over BCM's precarious financial situation, and the future of its President...
"The possible strains have raised questions about the future of Baylor's president, Dr. Peter Traber. A spokesperson declined comment, but numerous sources in the Medical Center said his leadership is the subject of board discussion."
#3
Posted Wednesday, October 29, 2008 at 9:14 AM
#4
Posted Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 2:31 AM
iThink forever.
#5
Posted Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 10:52 AM
I'm voting for "Baylorice" -- Pronounced "Bale of Rice."
#6
Posted Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 3:22 PM
"""Rice is the more affluent of the two institutions. As of June 30, its endowment was $4.6 billion. As of Sept. 30, Baylor's was $954 million."""
has Baylor somehow really eaten through 300+ million of their endowment?
#7
Posted Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 4:24 PM
The "clash of cultures" seems imminent. I say no.
Auchan (1988-2003)
Foley's (1900-2006)
Astroworld (1968-2005)
The MKT Railroad (1893-1997)
Variety Fair 5&10 (1948-2010)
Also, please visit College Station Roads & Retail.
#8
Posted Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 6:11 PM
Rice won't change their name. They will acquire a medical school.I hope that Rice wouldn't change their name...since Baylor Med is apparently broke, why not absorb them?
The "clash of cultures" seems imminent. I say no.
#9
Posted Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 7:24 PM
Let's brainstorm a new name.
I'm voting for "Baylorice" -- Pronounced "Bale of Rice."
In all seriousness, though, if this thing were to happen, I would love to see it named the DeBakey School of Medicine at Rice University. Not only did Dr. DeBakey bring tremendous prominence to BCM, he assigned many of his patent royalties to the institution over the years. In so doing, he may be one of BCM's biggest, all-time donors.
#10
Posted Friday, October 31, 2008 at 9:41 AM
In all seriousness, though, if this thing were to happen, I would love to see it named the DeBakey School of Medicine at Rice University. Not only did Dr. DeBakey bring tremendous prominence to BCM, he assigned many of his patent royalties to the institution over the years. In so doing, he may be one of BCM's biggest, all-time donors.
"Say it ain't so Joe!"
#11
Posted Friday, October 31, 2008 at 10:40 AM
#12
Posted Friday, October 31, 2008 at 3:16 PM
Baylor has a great national reputation and would be a nice fit with Rice's image. Too bad Baylor and Methodist had such an ugly split though. It was so ugly that I wonder if this is Traber's last middle finger effort to Methodist? After all Methodist announced the possibility of using their new affiliation with Cornell Med to help the University of Houston open a Medical School in the TMC tied to Methodist...
Methodist affiliated with Cornell because the "Best Hospital" rankings require a medical school affiliation... basically Methodist just payed to put the Cornell name on official documents and signs. Very little collaboration goes on with the institution in New York. The establishment of a UofH medical school affiliated with Methodist is an entirely different issue. Although, most people think El Paso is next in line for a new medical school (affiliated with Texas Tech, I believe)... and it is clearly harder to sell a third med school in the Houston area. But I think it will happen eventually, and Methodist's new research building and institute is a step in that direction.
I think BCM royally screwed up when they broke from Methodist... they lost huge numbers of medicine and surgical faculty to better paying jobs and nicer facilities at Methodist. Seems like their leadership is a mess. The ambitious hospital development plus a terrible economy has exposed serious institutional problems. They continue to be ranked in the top 10 medical schools though.
#13
Posted Friday, October 31, 2008 at 3:30 PM
Methodist affiliated with Cornell because the "Best Hospital" rankings require a medical school affiliation... basically Methodist just payed to put the Cornell name on official documents and signs. Very little collaboration goes on with the institution in New York. The establishment of a UofH medical school affiliated with Methodist is an entirely different issue. Although, most people think El Paso is next in line for a new medical school (affiliated with Texas Tech, I believe)... and it is clearly harder to sell a third med school in the Houston area. But I think it will happen eventually, and Methodist's new research building and institute is a step in that direction.
I think BCM royally screwed up when they broke from Methodist... they lost huge numbers of medicine and surgical faculty to better paying jobs and nicer facilities at Methodist. Seems like their leadership is a mess. The ambitious hospital development plus a terrible economy has exposed serious institutional problems. They continue to be ranked in the top 10 medical schools though.
Texas Tech has already established their second medical school and yes it is in El Paso
http://www.ttuhsc.edu/elpaso/
#14
Posted Friday, October 31, 2008 at 3:40 PM
Texas Tech has already established their second medical school and yes it is in El Paso
http://www.ttuhsc.edu/elpaso/
Cool... wasn't aware it was already approved.
The Texas Tech School of Medicine was established in 1969 for the West Texas region and El Paso has hosted a regional campus since 1973. The El Paso campus has provided clinical training for a large portion of Texas Tech's School of Medicine for well over 30 years. The Paul L. Foster School of Medicine at El Paso is a new full four year medical school that will have its first freshman class start in August 2009.
So I guess, now there is a TT med school based in Lubbock, but still with 3rd and 4th year rotations in El Paso and a TT med school entirely based in El Paso.
#15
Posted Friday, October 31, 2008 at 4:21 PM
I hope that Rice wouldn't change their name...since Baylor Med is apparently broke, why not absorb them?
The "clash of cultures" seems imminent. I say no.
I will suggest BCM at Rice U.
iThink forever.
#16
Posted Friday, December 19, 2008 at 11:20 AM
We are writing to update you on the status of merger discussions between Baylor College of Medicine and Rice University – discussions which could
join our institutions into an academic and research powerhouse that could make huge contributions to health and prosperity here and around the world.
Texas Children’s Hospital is playing an integral role as these discussions progress. We have before us a unique opportunity for all three institutions, and others, to take a giant step forward in creating a world-class university and academic medical center that will serve our stakeholders, city and state well. We appreciate the enthusiastic expressions of support for these discussions that we have received from our various constituencies.
The advancement of education and research provides the primary impetus for the discussions, and we believe the resulting knowledge and discovery can improve health care and, in the process, create a dynamic engine of biomedical enterprise in the Texas Medical Center. The partnership would create a premier research university with unparalleled ability to translate new discoveries into innovative medical care that protects and restores the health of the patients we would serve, and of
people around the world who would benefit from these treatments and technologies.
Many issues remain to be resolved. Positive solutions must be found, for example, for the new BCM hospital now under construction and the relocation
and continuing operations of the Baylor Clinic. Texas Children's Hospital and BCM -- already primary partners in pediatric and obstetrical care -- are
working on identifying solutions. BCM also has important relationships with other institutions in the Texas Medical Center, including The Methodist Hospital, St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Ben Taub General Hospital. A successful merger would include strengthening those collaborations.
The proximity of these and other institutions in the Texas Medical Center is rich ground for such partnerships. In this age of bioscience, the results of that collaborative research offer breathtaking possibilities for the prosperity and prominence of Houston and Texas.
BCM, TCH and Rice are committed to this significant and worthy goal and we will continue to update you as the discussions evolve.
#17
Posted Thursday, February 12, 2009 at 11:32 PM
#18
Posted Friday, February 13, 2009 at 6:42 PM
http://www.nacubo.or....._2007 NES.pdf
"""Rice is the more affluent of the two institutions. As of June 30, its endowment was $4.6 billion. As of Sept. 30, Baylor's was $954 million."""
has Baylor somehow really eaten through 300+ million of their endowment?![]()
Yes. If you compare nacubo's FY 2004 report, when the BCM endowment was $ .972 billion, to the 30/09/2007 one you link, when it was $ .954 billion, and then add in the statement in the back of their Winter 2008 print magazine that they have received just over $ .7 billion in philanthropic donations since 2003, they have eaten through a lot.
http://www.nacubo.or...etsforPress.pdf
#19
Posted Friday, February 13, 2009 at 6:59 PM
My source also said that the influential Jewish leadership of the Texas Children's Hospital really did not want to see Baylor re-associate itself with a "sectarian" institution (presumably Methodist or St. Luke's.) and that was one of the reasons why Rice was so attractive.
That plus apparently a lot of board overlap among Rice and BCM.
The time frame of this merger would be dependent upon substantial completion of the BCM hospital building structure so that it could be taken over by Harris County as a psychiatric hospital.
I have no way to substantiate any of this since I am hearing it secondhand. Just thought it was interesting.
#20
Posted Friday, February 13, 2009 at 9:08 PM
I have heard from a BCM staffer that one of the conditions of the breakup of the Baylor College of Medicine from Baylor University (in the 1960's) was that if the College of Medicine were to associate itself with another (then) Southwest Conference school it could no longer use the Baylor name. The proposed name would be something like the DeBakey College of Medicine at Rice University. Yes, the DeBakey name would definitely be used.
That would be great. He has a great legacy with BCM, and, from what I understand, he had given (continues to give!) through patents of his inventions. We're not talking small numbers.
My source also said that the influential Jewish leadership of the Texas Children's Hospital really did not want to see Baylor re-associate itself with a "sectarian" institution (presumably Methodist or St. Luke's.) and that was one of the reasons why Rice was so attractive.
Peter Wareing's jewish! Who knew? Oy!
Both institutions have had jewish leadership for many years. Actually it's a matter of business and business model.
Regarding Methodist…
The TMH/BCM divorce has much emotion wrapped around it. They basically want to piss on each other. (How healthy is that?
Regarding St. Lukes Episcopal Hospital…
They have a model built around primary care. They have created a vast network of clinics. They also have a deep relationship with Kelsey-Seybold. That primary care is not a good fit with BCM's research/tertiary aspirations.
That plus apparently a lot of board overlap among Rice and BCM.
That makes sense. If anything, Houston is still a town that consolidates power. Always has been.
The time frame of this merger would be dependent upon substantial completion of the BCM hospital building structure so that it could be taken over by Harris County as a psychiatric hospital.
Uhhh…Baylor has a psych clinic (in a basic outpatient model). However, the ONLY inpatient facilities that operate around here are TMH and HCPC
(operated by UT Health Science)
Oh, there is Menninger. BCM and TMH have interest of that. If BCM is looking to offload that, they should just have write it off to TMH.
#21
Posted Saturday, February 14, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Yes. If you compare nacubo's FY 2004 report, when the BCM endowment was $ .972 billion, to the 30/09/2007 one you link, when it was $ .954 billion, and then add in the statement in the back of their Winter 2008 print magazine that they have received just over $ .7 billion in philanthropic donations since 2003, they have eaten through a lot.
http://www.nacubo.or...etsforPress.pdf
Your own numbers show they have not eaten through any like $300 Million of their endowment. To the contrary, you show their endowment going down by only $18 Million; one would imagine they might have had some losses on their investments. Perhaps they've burned through a lot of other money; I don't know. But not all money goes in the endowment.
The fact that they have raised just over $700 Million in donations since 2003, while the endowment has not grown substantially does not really tell us anything either. Not all donations go to the endowment (in fact, I would venture to guess that most do NOT go into the endowment) and not all of that money has necessarily been spent.
A lot of those donations are probably for the new hospital construction. (For example Dan Duncan gave $35 Million in 2004 for a new adult ambulatory care center, and also pledged $100 Million for the cancer center; Neither of those amounts is likely to be in the endowment; first, because they are pledged for specific items, including construction and equipment; and second because, at least in part, they are pledges that may not have been completely delivered yet.)
Edited by Houston19514, Monday, February 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM.
#22
Posted Sunday, February 15, 2009 at 1:42 AM
#23
Posted Monday, February 16, 2009 at 8:24 PM
I have heard from a BCM staffer that one of the conditions of the breakup of the Baylor College of Medicine from Baylor University (in the 1960's) was that if the College of Medicine were to associate itself with another (then) Southwest Conference school it could no longer use the Baylor name. The proposed name would be something like the DeBakey College of Medicine at Rice University. Yes, the DeBakey name would definitely be used.
My source also said that the influential Jewish leadership of the Texas Children's Hospital really did not want to see Baylor re-associate itself with a "sectarian" institution (presumably Methodist or St. Luke's.) and that was one of the reasons why Rice was so attractive.
That plus apparently a lot of board overlap among Rice and BCM.
The time frame of this merger would be dependent upon substantial completion of the BCM hospital building structure so that it could be taken over by Harris County as a psychiatric hospital.
I have no way to substantiate any of this since I am hearing it secondhand. Just thought it was interesting.
My sources say that the original plan for the BCM hospital and clinic is still a go; The real question that needs to be answered is what happens to all of the faculty at SLEH when the new hospital opens. I think BCM has the potential to take a large faculty hit when this happens. Some of these folks are perfectly happy where they are and don't want to leave.
#24
Posted Monday, February 16, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Your own numbers show they have not ...
This merger would be a pretty unusual thing, right, doesn't happen very often...?
#25
Posted Tuesday, February 17, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Anyone's happy to leave the proving job to the fact (that tamtagon picks up on) that this is an institution backed into a corner.
really not sure where you're going with that. They may or may not be in financial difficulty; I do not know and have not expressed an opinion. And that is a quite different (although related) question than the question of whether they have eaten through a lot of their endowment.
All my post demonstrated was that, at least according to the figures you posted, they had NOT eaten through any significant amount of their endowment (contrary to your statement).
#26
Posted Wednesday, March 25, 2009 at 9:34 PM
#27
Posted Wednesday, March 25, 2009 at 9:40 PM
So, BCM has sent out the word that they are finishing the exterior of their new hospital, but will suspend construction of the interior indefinitely until they have the financial capacity to do so.
WTF!? Are they that seriously mismanaged?
#28
Posted Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 7:15 AM
Chronicle
In an e-mail to faculty, Butler said the temporary suspension buys time to acquire additional capital through philanthropy, federal funds and other sources, gives the markets a chance to settle and provides an opportunity to consider project partners.
Sources said that by not building out the interior, it’s also possible the hospital shell would be more attractive to a buyer wanting to tailor the facility to its own desired specifications.
But in his e-mail to faculty, Butler dismissed such speculation: “Taking this pause will allow us to ultimately fulfill the plan to build the hospital,” he wrote. “The board has made it clear it is committed to this project.”
#29
Posted Friday, March 27, 2009 at 8:10 AM
Here' the full story link from the Chron.
Chronicle
In an e-mail to faculty, Butler said the temporary suspension buys time to acquire additional capital through philanthropy, federal funds and other sources, gives the markets a chance to settle and provides an opportunity to consider project partners.
Sources said that by not building out the interior, it’s also possible the hospital shell would be more attractive to a buyer wanting to tailor the facility to its own desired specifications.
But in his e-mail to faculty, Butler dismissed such speculation: “Taking this pause will allow us to ultimately fulfill the plan to build the hospital,” he wrote. “The board has made it clear it is committed to this project.”
The article also mentioned that the board had hired Price-Waterhouse to give them recommendations. That translates into "layoffs".
#30
Posted Saturday, March 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM
iThink forever.































