Jump to content

Downtown Trolleys Are History April 1st.


Recommended Posts

March 22, 2005, 10:48PM

Downtown trolleys to stop rolling April 1

Their demise is no surprise after ridership losses

By LUCAS WALL

Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

RESOURCES

TROLLEY TIMELINE

Ups and downs of Metro's vintage downtown bus service:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a shame, I thought they were pretty cool looking.

Downtown workers are going to be hurting for lunch. I know lots of people who used those during lunch time. Maybe this is just another step in the Mayor's "let's get healthy houston!" weight loss plan. People will:

1) Not eat

2) Walk to lunch

The excuses METRO uses to explain their demise are so lame. This is just an attempt to boost the METRO rail ridership numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^  Low ridership is a lame excuse?

They need all the extra money they can find to help keep the rail afloat. Now that METRO has to come up with money up front for the extensions of the light rail instead of relying on the federal govt, they are really worried that the existing line will be the end of the system. I guess like most entities, it is all about money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things that really hurt trolley ridership was elimination of trips into Midtown and the East End, which were big lunch routes. Also, many Midtown residents took the Midtown trolley to work (for free) every day.

I don't think that this is some scam to boost rail ridership numbers. Even before the first adjustment of trolley routes occured last year, the trolley ridership was going down as rail ridership went up. I think a lot of people are using rail to shorten walking distances north and south in downtown. And let's be real, here. There are hardly any major office buildings that are more than six blocks from a MetroRail stop. Even if you don't ever take Metro anywhere else, a MetroRail downtown pass costs only like $25 a year for unlimited trips between UH Downtown and the Downtown Transit Center. With one of those, a short walk to a MetroRail stop to navigate north and south in downtown, and another short walk, any restaurant in downtown can easily be reached without much physical exertion. And the rail runs a lot more often and is faster than the trolleys were. Finally, if you can't stand the weather outside, there's always the tunnels to get around, which is what it seems like the majority people are doing anyway.

Metro needs to cut costs -- not to keep the rail line afloat -- but because like everyone else, they are experiencing the effects of expensive fuel, only on a huge scale. If changes aren't made, there's no other choice but to increase fares, which usually results in a dip in ridership for a while. There's a fine balancing act between implementing a fare increase and not decreasing overall revenue because of the decrease in ridership. Even if the rail line did not exist, I doubt things would be much different right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...