Jump to content

kennyc05

Full Member
  • Posts

    805
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kennyc05

  1. 5 minutes ago, Big E said:

    Austin is no real model toĀ anyone on anything regarding traffic, highways, or transit, considering how bad its own traffic issues are, directly due to its lack of major north-south and east-west routes, how terrible and broken its own street grid is, its persistent suburban sprawl, and lagging transit. I-35 is a mess and probably does need to be rebuilt, especially the double decked portion. But the one thing this article makes supremely clear is that TxDOT is deafly afraid of even attempting to tunnel a highway, and will always throw that idea out first. Which makes the fact that they aren't planning to cap I-45 and I-69 themselves make all the more sense. Also, calling a freeway "racist and toxic" us just stupid. A freeway, by virtue of being a big slab of concrete, can be neither of those things.Ā 

    Like I said in a earlier post they should have went with a tunnel between the beltway and 610.

    • Like 1
  2. 6 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

    From what I understand reading the TOD guidelines, they are fully optional on secondary streets. That means they donā€™t have to front the street or take advantage of the 50% parking reduction. Itā€™s really just an incentive to developers and itā€™s encouraged by the city to take advantage of the parking reduction.Ā The rulesĀ are only mandatory on designated TOD streets.Ā 

    And I guess the walkable please designation picks up the slack on non TOD streets.

  3. 4 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

    Yeah the developer has the option to opt in and cut 50% of their parking requirement as a secondary street. And yes Richmond AveĀ is considered a TOD streetĀ because the CoH is viewing it as a future transit line.Ā 

    Capture.PNG

    Cool I thought it didn't go into effect until the lines went in.Ā 

    Ā 

    So if they were to opt out does that just deal with just the parking on secondary streets or are secondary streets now required to have the buildings up against the road or can they opt out on setbacks as well?

  4. 7 minutes ago, j_cuevas713 said:

    Montrose BlvdĀ is considered a TOD secondary street, so hopefully whatever is built will take that in to consideration.Ā 

    Is it officially a TOD street even though the Richmond line isn't built yet. And by looking at the TOD map it's considered a secondary street. Does that mean they don't have to follow any of the TOD guidelines?

    • Like 2
  5. On 7/25/2021 at 8:17 AM, CaptainJilliams said:

    Hey yā€™all, itā€™s been a while since Iā€™ve posted on HAIF, and Iā€™m not sure if this thread is the appropriate place for this video, but I thought it was an interesting discussion on transit/walkability that revolves around Houston (you can skip to 3:43 in the video if you want to get to the Houston stuff).

    Ā 

    While I donā€™t agree with everything presented in the video, it literally hit home for me because of his area of study. Before I recently relocated to Chicago, I lived in Jersey Village for almost 2 years, and from what I can tell given his map and video footage, he looks to be near Willowbrook Mall (the In-and-Out gave it away for me).Ā 
    Ā 

    He does make several good points, granted his time is spent more in the suburbs I can see his criticism reverberate to other areas of the city, even within the loop. Most of his observations went over my head when I lived there, probably due to the fact that I have grown up in car culture. But I definitely recall the lack of sidewalks in many areas and the limited walkability that created in essence ā€œislandsā€ of walkability, stranding people.
    Ā 

    Again, I think Houston is a complicated city to judge, so I think itā€™s open for discussion on how the city can make strides to improve walkability and other forms of transit that donā€™t revolve around the car. He does note that Houston has made improvements as of recent, so itā€™s not all negative.Ā Definitely would love to hear peopleā€™s thoughts, Houston will always be a 2nd home for me and I miss it!

    Ā 

    I watched this this morning.

    • Like 1
  6. 6 hours ago, j_cuevas713 said:

    I became passionate about Houston development when the Stros/Rockets built their new stadiums with the threat of possibly relocating. I remember the Cotswold project being the first project that got me excited about the possibilities downtown. Been a member pretty much since the beginning.Ā 

    https://www.chron.com/neighborhood/bellaire/news/article/The-Cotswold-Project-beautifies-Downtown-9803075.php

    I didn't get on this site until 2005 officially I was following all that action on Clutch City/Clutch fans if those idiots wouldn't have took away my account back in the day at Clutch CityĀ  I probably would have been a 20 year member LolĀ 

    Ā 

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...