Jump to content

102IAHexpress

Full Member
  • Posts

    587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 102IAHexpress

  1. 11 hours ago, samagon said:

     

    places not open on Sunday in downtown:

     

    1. Chic-fil-a

    2. Lucienne

    3. Hobby Lobby

     

    Hobby Lobby serves food? I didn't know there was a Hobby Lobby in Downtown? I didn't think the restaurant scene in downtown was this bad if a Hobby Lobby counts as a restaurant. But I guess, I've seen fast food restaurants inside Targets and Wal-Marts so I guess they do count too. I've seen some fanatics regarding Costco's pizzas. 

  2. On ‎10‎/‎2‎/‎2017 at 0:14 PM, Houston19514 said:

    With today's opening of Hotel Alessandra, we can add Lucienne and Bardot to the long list of places to eat in the evenings and on weekends in downtown Houston.

     

    I just called Lucienne to make a reservation for dinner on Sunday. They are closed for dinner this Sunday and every Sunday. Please add Lucienne to the long list of places not fully open on the weekends in Downtown. Very frustrating. 

     

    On ‎10‎/‎5‎/‎2017 at 10:08 AM, Houston19514 said:

    And another... Theodore Rex opens tomorrow.  

     

    Is this place even in downtown?

  3. 1 hour ago, cspwal said:

    There seem to be a surprising number of families living in SkyHouse and Houston House

     

    Really. I didn't know that. I know those properties are mostly studio, one bedroom and two bedrooms. Does the newest skyhouse have any three bedrooms? I don't know? Though, I would imagine most families living at those properties will need more space than that as their families grow. 

    • Like 1
  4. 12 hours ago, Twinsanity02 said:

    Just wondering the demographics necessary to open a grocery store. With all the apartments, lofts etc in this area, not to mention the level of affluence It would be surprising if one doesn't open and soon.

     

    Well we have Phoenicia? But I guess you mean west of Main street? For a traditional grocery store you need a lot more people than what downtown west of main street has. You also need a lot of families, which all of downtown has very little of. Families comprise the regular weekly shoppers that grocery stores needs. I lived at Rice lofts for several years, I don't think i ever saw one family living there. 

  5. @Vy65 is correct. It's a mediocre design. However, W's are really known for their architecture and design inside the hotel not their exterior design. If any thought is put on a W's exterior it's usually a cool rooftop bar. We will have to wait and see how this W compares with other W interiors. If this interior gets shortchanged, then I think that is a more fair criticism. 

     

    I'm more interested in the location and what the location says about Houston. W's operate in the cool and trendy area's of a neighborhood. The investors have objectively concluded that the convention center is the cool part of downtown! Houston does an absolute horrible job marketing itself if this is the best place for a W in Houston. 

    • Like 1
  6. 15 minutes ago, Naviguessor said:

    That's a rebranded Holiday Inn, by the looks of it, not unlike our own holiday Inn/Days Inn in south downtown. Not a small property at all. There have been several W's that have done this. Notably, the former W in NOLA cbd, which was a Holiday Inn Crown Plaza in its former life. 

     

    Gotcha. You're right.

     

    16 minutes ago, Naviguessor said:

    I also, think that we should stop calling W Hotels, Five Star. They are not. They are generally pretty standard Four Star properties.  The market pitch for this proposal has been a little over-the-top, imo.  

     

     

    Yeah I stayed at this property a couple months ago. Four star at best. 

  7. 23 hours ago, Houston19514 said:

     

    It seems unlikely it would have 400 rooms.  That would be unusually large for a W Hotel (or any "boutique" hotel).  But hopefully, it will also have some condos on top. My understanding from the original RFP is that the base structure was built to be able to handle a hotel "up to" 400 rooms and "up to" 15 stories. 

    5a870814b17e9_Image-2(2).thumb.png.55913706cf10dbf72b178a40749cc1fc.png

     

     

    I snapped a picture of the W outside my apartment window. W Lakeshore Chicago. It's actually 520 rooms.

    Perhaps, 300+ rooms are the norm for new-construction W's? I don't know. Anyways, the one outside my window has a parking garage as its base. So W's with a base have been done before. Interesting proposed location in downtown. I'm not sure a W would fit with downtown Houston's business culture. 

     

     

    • Like 3
  8. 11 hours ago, gmac said:

    I'm in favor of a good old bloody fight to the death over this useless boondoggle.

     

    I wasn't aware a private venture could be a boondoggle. I suppose technically it can. But what do you care? Do you have input on better ways for Texas Central to spend their own money? Is there anyone else's money you want to control too? Personally, If Texas Central wants to spend private money for this rail line, so be it. As long as no public money is used then I don't have a problem with it. If you think this rail line is a boondoggle, then what's your opinion on Elon Musk sending a Tesla into outer space? 

     

    Regarding eminent domain, as a libertarian I wouldn't have voted to extend eminent domain to certain private companies. However, libertarian or not, we live in a democracy. The people's representatives have debated it, and have enacted it into law. It's the current law of the State of Texas. 

    • Like 2
  9. 4 hours ago, gmac said:

    No way on earth they should be granted any eminent domain relief for a private venture.

     

    On this point the people of the great State of Texas disagree with you. Private railway companies specifically have the right to exercise eminent domain. I would refer you to Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 112.002 (Vernon):

     

    (a) A railroad company has the right to succession.

    (b) A railroad company may:

      (1) sue, be sued, plead, and be impleaded in its corporate name;

      (2) have and use a seal and alter the seal at will;

      (3) receive and convey persons and property on its railway by any mechanical power, including the use of steam;

      (4) regulate the time and manner in which, and the compensation for which, passengers and property are transported, subject to the provisions of law;

      (5) exercise the power of eminent domain for the purposes prescribed by this subtitle or Subtitle D;

      (6) purchase, hold, and use all property as necessary for the construction and use of its railway, stations, and other accommodations necessary to accomplish company objectives, and convey that property when no longer required for railway use; and

      (7) take, hold, and use property granted to the company to aid in the construction and use of its railway, and convey that property in a manner consistent with the terms of the grant when the property is no longer required for railway use.

    • Like 1
  10. 12 hours ago, Luminare said:

     

    As someone who used trains extensively while in Germany (including their ICE trains (their HSR lines)) trains do not function like airports in the slightest. Airports take you next to a city because there is no real possibility to have a fully effective airport in an urban environment while a train station is a mode of transportation that can take you right up to the front door of an urban environment and further.

     

    This is mostly false. There are over 5K public airports in the US. Not all of them are huge airports that require them to be far away from a city center. And actually some large airports are very close to the city center, like Las Vegas airport.

     

    Many small European town train stations function like small regional airports. Both get you pretty darn close to the town's center but not right in the center.

     

    What we have in the NW Mall "station" is similar to a small regional airport/small train town. It has just one airline/train line that flies/travels to one other station/airport several times per day fairly close to the town center, but not as close as a huge capital city train station. 

     

    I think you would be more correct if you said, -Large- airports do not function like -Large- train stations. Also, small train stations are sometimes in the town's center and sometimes are NOT in a town's center. 

  11. If built, it will be a huge automobile hub; taxi's, uber's, rental cars. The developers are obviously trying to bring as many cars to the station as possible and this location allows for that. The brand will try to convey convenience as much as possible. I can envision television commercials advertising, easy parking and or valet options. Very doubtful someone will shell out extra cash for the convenience and speed of a bullet train to Houston, only to detrain and wait for a Metro bus or light rail train! lol. 

  12. On ‎9‎/‎17‎/‎2017 at 5:33 PM, HoustonBoy said:

    Is this true? It's the first I hear of it and seems very sudden.

     

    Yup.

    Well, when the route was announced back in 2014, it was kind of sudden then too. Only fitting that it ends suddenly. Kudos to Korean Air for having the Houston route as long as they did. Right after they announced the route, United announced double daily service to Tokyo. Then Eva Air and ANA entered the Houston market. Also, without an alliance hub in Houston, Korean Air could only rely on local traffic, which is not that much between Houston and Korea. 

     

  13. On ‎8‎/‎25‎/‎2017 at 7:36 AM, cspwal said:

    When the Brightline railroad opens in Florida, both the Miami station and the Orlando station won't have Amtrak connections.  Orlando and Miami both currently have Amtrak service, but the new Brightline stations will be in different spots

     

    Understood. Yeah, Miami has a central station called Miami Airport Station with Amtrak service and Florida Tri-Rail service. Also, Orlando's Orlando Station has Amtrak service and Florida SunRail service. The new Brightline service would stop at separate stations.

     

    So my question is for anyone who may know the answer, if this NW Mall station gets built as planned, would Houston be the only city in the US with more than one inter city line, yet not have at least one station where you could connect to a separate inter-city line? 

     

    It seems like this would be like having two separate airports in the same city, however each airport having only one airline that flies only one route. 

  14. 9 hours ago, tigereye said:

    I'm in favor of a Northwest Mall terminus as long as it also connects to MetroRail, Uptown BRT and a Park & Ride Transit Center (maybe relocate NW Transit Center here). And since this site is connected to 2 major freeways (and Katy nearby), maybe this could become our regional intermodal transit station with Amtrak & Greyhound services integrated.

     

     

    Amtrak is a smart play. If the developers are smart they should partner with Amtrak and have them be co-tenants of the station. Maybe even help with overall capital costs of the station. The sunset limited runs right through NW mall so it could be a major improvement over the "station" that Amtrak has on Washington street. Once you have Amtrak on board, then it will start to feel more like a hub.

    • Like 2
  15. It's sad that we have to be reminded to stick to discussing architecture and quit ridiculing people we do not know. To say nothing of the fact that the people being ridiculed are nuns! Imagine if we took out the word nuns and inserted Muslims. This thread would have been shut down along time ago.

     

    This was a complete failure of leadership by the moderators of this forum. shame. 

    • Like 1
  16. On ‎10‎/‎13‎/‎2016 at 0:27 PM, bobruss said:

     This was a major f-up!

     

    On ‎11‎/‎16‎/‎2016 at 7:29 PM, UtterlyUrban said:

     The nuns should be embarrassed

     

    On ‎11‎/‎16‎/‎2016 at 10:24 PM, Dustin said:

    I think it's a crying shame. They could have saved and renovated it if they wanted to. They just didn't want to and didn't have the nerve to be honest about it.

     

    On ‎12‎/‎14‎/‎2016 at 3:11 PM, bobruss said:

    I hope the nuns have to say a thousand hell mary's for destroying the Nicholas Clayton for this piece of crap.

    Get the ruler. They need to pay penance for this.

     

    On ‎12‎/‎15‎/‎2016 at 7:20 PM, Texasota said:

    Maybe they should pay taxes if they don't want public input on what they do.

     

    On ‎12‎/‎31‎/‎2016 at 10:52 AM, Texasota said:

    In an earlier post, you said they were in the "business of saving souls," but no, they're really not. 

     

    On ‎12‎/‎31‎/‎2016 at 6:33 PM, Avossos said:

     God knows if they are even around in 30 years. 

     

    On ‎2‎/‎10‎/‎2017 at 5:37 PM, UtterlyUrban said:

    "IWA"

     

    Intentionally Wrecked Architecture"?

     

    The above comments don't sound like critiques on the building. They are obviously attacks on the sisters of IWA.

     

    haters going to hate indeed. 

    • Like 2
  17. 7 hours ago, Texasota said:

    As has been noted before, this is an architecture forum. The entire point of this website is to examine, criticize, and celebrate architecture.

     

     

    Then I would suggest you stick to that. If you were attending an architectural conference in New York or Chicago and someone asked you to critique and examine  this building and your educated response was to call it a turd, they would think you are a crazy person and not worthy of serious architectural discussion. Same goes to the guy who committed sacrilege by Photoshoping that obscenity on the side of the building. 

  18. 54 minutes ago, gmac said:

    Pretty cool looking school.

     

    I love it. The academy is in the business of saving souls and this new addition will help further that mission. Also from an urban city perspective, more space means more students can enroll. More enrolled students means a larger urban downtown population.

     

    It's funny to read the loonies on here demand more urban this and more urban that (although not putting up any of their own money). Then when a school tries to expand its footprint and become a larger urban neighbor in order to accommodate the needs of the community (on its own dime), those same posters complain. 

  19. 2 hours ago, Texasota said:

    It's just a building; reverence is neither necessary or appropriate.

     

    Cardinal Dinardo Blesses Campus Addition: https://incarnateword.org/website/index.php/about/news/145-cardinal-dinardo-blesses-campus-addition

     

    Cardinal_WebArticle.jpg.d515c6a8a99b5ce59d6a1b22b45daff4.jpg

     

    The Incarnate Word, is literally the word of God made flesh, Jesus Christ. Accordingly, If you Photoshop something inappropriate next to the image of the Incarnate Word, that is sacrilege. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...