No those are all the cities I've taken rail in. Commuting you can limit to Houston, Dallas, San Francisco, Vancouver, and New York. And yes Las Vegas is a monorail.
My point is LA is the ultimate car oriented city but even it realized that a strictly car oriented society is not the answer. Houston will find out soon enough, the hard way.
I take it five days a week. And I've taken it in San Francisco, New York, boston, Mexico City, London, buenos Aires, Rome, Tokyo, Vancouver, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Washington, D.C., and Dallas.
1. It wasn't always like that. In fact it had 1500 miles of streetcars at one point. Insert your point here about how your dad took them. 2. LA also thought it never needed rail, and now is aggressively building it at a pace faster than any city in north america 3. Why do the car lovers always take rail as a threat on their way of life? It reminds me of when the hint of gun control is mentioned to gun owners.
Pretty much every out of town person I've spoken to thinks we are a backwards city for not having some kind of rail connection to our airports. They find it stunning, in a bad way.
Definitely not particularly with the construction and hot lanes. I find this comment from you interesting, being that you think driving on or through streets with the light rail is so tough. Hypocrite.
Even if there is an uptown and university line there still needs to be an east/west line from northwest transit center into downtown, something parallel to university line.
Chinese have offered funding for the California high speed rail and also LA to Vegas. No surprise there. Also, Japan China France and Spain are all trying to get in to the budding high speed rail in Southeast Asia as well, India in particular. They're trying to sell the technology and knowledge.
I disagree. I lived by a Kroger at one time and the truck unloading each night at the dock was unbearable. Common sense says trees are better than concrete for air pollution.