KimberlySayWhat Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 http://calibre.mworld.com/m/m.w?lp=GetStory&id=220332001 Take it for what it's worth. It's much like the "cleanest city" study awhile back which based a city's cleanliness on the amount of cleaning stations (or whatever that was) they had placed around town. Or much like that fat city study. You know...1. Austin2. Indianapolis 3. Houston4. San Francisco5. (tie) Dallas, Jacksonville and Baltimore 6.7.8.9.10.11.12. San Antonio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ V Lawrence Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 http://calibre.mworld.com/m/m.w?lp=GetStory&id=220332001 Take it for what it's worth. It's much like the "cleanest city" study awhile back which based a city's cleanliness on the amount of cleaning stations (or whatever that was) they had placed around town. Or much like that fat city study. You know... 1. Austin 2. Indianapolis 3. Houston 4. San Francisco 5. (tie) Dallas, Jacksonville and Baltimore 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. San Antonio Man, I wanted to read the whole article, but I don't have the time for it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProHouston Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 I'm not sure how useful or accurate this report is, but looking at the "impatience" factors that they rated, I must be impatient. I do like things to happen quickly and easily. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.