Lara Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Just read this piece in the news about a 911 emergency operator who hung up on calls simply because she didn't feel like talking over the phone at the time. The punishment that she got, $4000 for each count, seems too light as these calls were serious; one man losing his life could have been prevented. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cspwal Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 On 10/21/2016 at 10:18 PM, Lara said: one man losing his life could have been prevented. Couldn't this be negligent manslaughter? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lara Posted October 27, 2016 Author Share Posted October 27, 2016 I agree, but, for some reason, she's not being pressed for these charges. He was the manager of a store that was being robbed at the time of the call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vishen Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 I think that she should have been charged for that, but what's done is done. Also, she has to live with the knowledge that she caused a man's death for the rest of your life so maybe that's punishment enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samagon Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 it would be impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that her hanging up on the caller rather than dispatching a patrol car resulted in the death of the store manager. as this is really unprecedented I'm sure rules are going to be rewritten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esther Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 I think Samagon may be right. I'm very surprised to hear that they had no rules for this kind of thing. Or if they do, then they don't really apply to this exact situation. I just hope that justice will be served, for the sake of those poor victims. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lara Posted October 30, 2016 Author Share Posted October 30, 2016 Still, I think, at the very least, she should be held on account of being an accessory to the armed robbery that took place. That will be more fair than letting her get off, setting a dangerous precedent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 This would be like charging someone for standing by and not doing anything while they are watching a crime being committed. I only know of one state, somewhere in New England, that will actually charge a person for doing nothing to stop a crime they are watching being committed by someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirJac Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 On 10/27/2016 at 7:15 AM, Vishen said: I think that she should have been charged for that, but what's done is done. Also, she has to live with the knowledge that she caused a man's death for the rest of your life so maybe that's punishment enough. You never know though. Some people have zero empathy for others, and this sounds like her. To hang up on people in dire need shows a total lack of empathy on her part. Double or triple the fines. That's the only thing that would phase her I think. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vishen Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 You may be right. There are those among us who don't seem to have any conscience at all. I wonder what has to happen to a person to turn them into that cold, uncaring thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lara Posted November 9, 2016 Author Share Posted November 9, 2016 On 11/7/2016 at 2:22 AM, Ricardo said: This would be like charging someone for standing by and not doing anything while they are watching a crime being committed. I only know of one state, somewhere in New England, that will actually charge a person for doing nothing to stop a crime they are watching being committed by someone else. I appreciate the example given, and I must admit I am not well-versed with the intricacies of the law in this regard. I don't consider it right, though, to put people who are in such important positions in the same category as bystanders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted November 10, 2016 Share Posted November 10, 2016 True, a 911 operator is not a mere bystander, but they, the operator on the phone and a person physically there, are both in a position to help. A 911 operator is trained to help whereas the average bystander is not. That being the case, I think that law in New England has it backwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.