Jump to content

Warehouse Next To Specs


jt16

Recommended Posts

That's All well and good in the textbook, but Houston is a city of automobile drivers.  Pedestrian traffic pretty much comes to a halt by July. 

But considering how much residential development there is just within a few blocks of this new store I'm sure there will be quite a bit of pedestrian traffic from the nearby apartments and townhomes at all times of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh where to begin...

First, most of the basic elements of "urban design" can be incorporated into their store without any impact or cost to their typical development. Echo those comments previously about simply moving the building to the street and placing parking on side and/or behind. But, simply put they don't have to do it so they won't.

As for Houston being a City of drivers, it is obvious this is the case. But, you could argue that it is a city of drivers because the built environment was designed for and around the car, not pedestrians. If you want a pedestrian environment, you must create it with the design of the built environment. This is a self-perpetuating problem. The more you build auto dominated design, the more auto dominated you become. You have to start somewhere. Midtown is the best and only hope (outside of Downtown) for true urban development; allbeit, it is rapidly fading.

As for parking ordinances, they are a problem. The same requirement pertains to midtown as it does in Kingwood. This is a problem that must be addressed to spur more urban development in Midtown, especially as land prices continue to increase.

As for going to the MRDA meetings, it is always good to show up and speak your mind. But, the board is essentially powerless on this type issue. They have failed to pursue the ability to institute land use and/or design control. Without it, they simply ask the developers for their consideration and hope they get it. The board members are afraid to push the issue with City Council (they have to CC approval for this ability). When you ask a board member about this, they simply laugh and say it will never happen. This is the prevailing attitude of the board members that serve your neighborhood. That being said, this will only change if all of those who support urban design and/or oppose typical suburban development in midtown will organize and make their point in more public and open forums (i.e. political forums).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If midtown develops like we want it too with as much residnetial that is expected, having this many pharmacies would be a problem. San Francisco is extremely dense, seeing the need for many locations. Houston will get to this point (maybe not San Fran dense) to where these locations are needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If midtown develops like we want it too with as much residnetial that is expected, having this many pharmacies would be a problem.  San Francisco is extremely dense, seeing the need for many locations.  Houston will get to this point (maybe not San Fran dense) to where these locations are needed.

But there is already a Walgreens on W. Grey and another on Montrose. I do not think there is a need for another one anytime soon. The only reason they are building there is to try and push CVS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...