Jump to content

tangledwoods

Full Member
  • Posts

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by tangledwoods

  1. this property like many others around the downtown freeways (59 and Pierce Elevated) are all in a holding pattern waiting on txDOT to move forward on its downtown freeway circulation plan.  This site is less affected than sites like the post office, but it will still play a major impact on the traffic studies and feasibility for different use cases.

     

    Like the article said, this is a fantastic property and we will see development happen.  When that development comes to fruition is contingent on so many external factors that even the developers involved would be stupid to throw out delivery dates.  Now all we need is for someone to sneak into Gensler's or HOK's office and find one of their site massing models for the site.  You know an intern spent their summer on one...... 

     

  2. project is NOT temporary. I work for a general contractor that thought about bidding on the thing, we had people at the prebid.  This is designed to be a permanent structure.  With that being said, there is a good chance this thing doesnt get built.  Their schedule is too tight and their budget is too small.  It has already been put on the market once and NO ONE bid the stupid thing.

     

    My guess is that they take bids, its over budget and then it goes away for another 6-12 months.

    • Like 3
  3. Quote

    The guy in a hard hat setting up barriers said it would take a year to demolish. Perhaps the exterior will start coming down this summer, but it appears that they are starting now.

    I have worked on a few jobs like this one, here is how it will likely go:

    • They will run interior asbestos abatement crews that will likely gut / scrap most of the interior.  
    • Then the building will be processed down with high reach demo excavators.

    This one should be pretty fun to watch once the get to the facade and structure demo. 

  4.  

    I wonder if Chevron can convince the City to "lease" the grass lawn for a symbolic $1/year to allow the city to use the land as a temporary park. One would think Chevron would reap the benefits of either reduced property tax exposure or perhaps an in-kind donation allowing use of the land would provide a tax break.

     

    Perhaps someone more versed in corporate tax law would be able to lay out any tax advantages of a temporary Chevron Green Park. The benefit to the city--more succinctly the people of the city--is rather straightforward.

     

    The problem with turning this into a park is PR.  While it would be a nice gesture, 4 years from now the headlines would read "CHEVRON DESTROYS CITY PARK" and all of the environmental folks would jump on and turn it into a negative for Chevron.  These companies are allergic to any perceived or real environmental incidents and I would be really surprised to see them do anything that encourages the use of this land other than "FUTURE OFFICE BUILDING"

     

     

    • Like 5
  5.  

     

    What is the likelihood of Skanska moving forward with a restructured development concept..? Say.. try to lure one of those fabled high end hotels and residences to the property? It seems they would have an easier time developing this property as something other than office. 

     

    I would say 0%.  They are sitting on a city block in the south side of downtown that they have owned for 5+ years.  I don't see them in much of a hurry.  The only change here is if their global development cash flow got pinched.  

     

    Which seems to be doing fine....

    http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/breaking_ground/2016/01/skanska-lands-first-tenant-for-spec-office-project.html

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...