Jump to content

Texasota

Full Member
  • Posts

    2,771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Texasota

  1. No I get it. Metro is easier because they might actually listen. But that doesn't mean they have to do everything, and I'd rather push them to improve service and frequency.

    Accessibility is part of that of course, but adding vines to bus shelters is greenwashing something that's already actually pretty green. 

    What I'd really like to see Metro do is seriously take inspiration from their better projects (the red line) and avoid the kinds of mistakes they're looking at making with the Gulfton line. Two new lanes of impermeable pavement will do a lot to contribute to a heat island effect and make that route a lot less safe than if they just replaced two existing lanes with transit lanes.

  2. I just don't think adding some vines is a real long-term solution - planting trees is. 

    You'll notice the example bus stop you gave on Montrose (which isn't one of the new ones) does provide shade behind it, so it's not just becoming an oven. But ultimately you need the layering effect of a tree canopy to make a real difference. 

    What Metro *should* be doing is working with the management districts, City, TXDOT, etc, to fund new tree plantings, especially near bus stops. 

    But ultimately Metro isn't the problem here. Shade needs to be a city-wide priority, and I'd rather Metro focus on maximizing service *first*. 

    Or to put it differently: Why add things to Metro's plate when the real problems are TXDOT, Public Works, etc?

    • Like 1
  3. 82 was always going to become a Boost line. The "Westheimer Signature Service" thing is separate, skips Lower Westheimer, and hasn't really been fully explained, but definitely seems to still be planned.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...