CHSNIDER

GRB instead of the full name of the place is one thing, but I think that these individuals expressing criticism are noticing a pattern in our news media - first names to people news-reporter shave just met, and are talking to for whatever reason, deserve the respect of Mr. and Mrs. I have even heard "where they're at," "this is where he's at" in the reports. On a different angle of critique or observation, this is not competitive for those same individuals possibly shooting for bigger markets, or national markets in their career. I don't see the debate. These have been valid observations.

This is great information, and the hotlink describes a Houston history and archeology body I never knew existed. I read these proposals, and my first thought is that they will make it more difficult to designate something historical, and hence more difficult to save something from demolition. The following two points seem intended to make things harder, and if the applicants fail to meet them, then "well they failed to follow procedure so now the city or private developers will go ahead with their plans." Applications for a certificate of appropriateness must be complete and meet submittal deadline to be on the next HAHC agenda <LI>Posted notice (front yard

http://www.philly.com/philly/travel/200811...?page=1&c=y