Jump to content

astrohip

Full Member
  • Posts

    297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by astrohip

  1. They are assembling a huge crane just off-site from the RO. I'm sure @hindesky can give us a better description than "huge". I'm posting this here because there is nothing else around that needs a crane like this. It's on Buffalo Spdwy in front of Lamar Towers, but I can't imagine why they (Lamar T) would need this. And there isn't any major construction planned at the St. Johns athletic fields that I'm aware of. I'm not sure how they will get this crane over to the RO property if that's where it's going, and why they didn't simply assemble it there? If it turns out not to be for the RO, I will delete this post.

    For reference, this is looking South. Lamar Towers is behind it, and the RO is in the back right side of this photo.

    This is Saturday morning. They started moving this into place around midnight.

     

     

    65795.jpeg

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  2. 1 hour ago, __nevii said:

     

    But the problem still remains with valuable land areas (proximity to CBD/walkable urbanity) being locked away, limiting the ability for demand to be satiated (in turn, driving up prices). 

    Without speaking to any particular area or project... why is this a problem? If current residents have "locked away" the land use in their area, doesn't that indicate that current residents want a certain type of development? Why should you, or anyone for that matter, be able to decide how an area should be developed that is "locked away"?

    This does not apply to areas that have no restrictions. If there is no zoning, or deed restrictions, or land use limits of any sort, then yes, you can develop. So an Ashby Hi-Rise would be allowed. But if there are restrictions of any sort, why should someone else decide to throw them out?

    Isn't that "taking"?

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
    • Sad 1
  3. 13 hours ago, HTX1121 said:

    Oxy bought their site within the development.

    Interesting development (and thanks for posting!). What does this mean for both their building, and the entire RO project? Does this mean they can build what they want, using who they want, and not have to go thru the developer? I'm assuming there are certain restrictions in the sale, but in general, what are the ramifications of this?

    • Like 1
  4. 13 hours ago, 004n063 said:

    Those poor Southamptonites. Such a downtrodden bunch.

    The person who started the protest is from Southgate, not Southampton. So technically it's' "those poor Southgatorades".

    So this appears to be more of a "leave my Village alone", than a neighborhood protest, since Southgate is a good distance from this project. But I think the "leave the Village alone" horse has long left the building.

    • Haha 5
  5. On 4/2/2024 at 1:10 PM, urbanize713 said:

    I am being told: "We are working through contract reviews on this now. Short answer is that we will start design this spring, that will take 12-18 months, then another 12 months of permitting and then construction (another 12-18 months). We are at least three years out. These projects take forever. "

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 1
  6. 43 minutes ago, Amlaham said:

    That seems... astounding.

    I wonder if the buyers are all future residents? Does anyone know if the HOA rules prohibit renting, short or long term? I'm thinking maybe people buying as an investment property, with intentions to rent?

    Because $250MM is an unbelievable number.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...