Jump to content

ArtNsf

Full Member
  • Posts

    285
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ArtNsf

  1. 7 hours ago, Timoric said:

    DFW will get there first unfortunately, they have maintained a stubborn lead, I always hope it will change but it doesn't

    No, they will not get their first.  You are talking about MSA numbers, which are completely different (and also are not as widely accepted as they can be a bit more arbitrary and un-precise.)  We are talking about CITY populations, not combined regions of various medium sized cities like dfw etc... 

     

    Houston will probably get passed Chicago in less than 5 years as I see it, and easily we have already surpassed 7 million Houston area residents by this time as we are in 2019 and thus, the census may show the world some big Houston changes and surprises over the past 10 years or so.  I'm excited for it and Houston is a fantastic place to live and to be at this time in history.  Keep up the good work Houston !

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
  2. Well, I for one am hoping praying and dreaming of a brand new "supertall" downtown that is higher than Chase Tower. Although 75 stories was pretty awesome in the early 80's, I think enough decades have passed for some forward thinking and very wealthy investor to take us to this next level that all the 3 largest cities in America bigger than Houston have already done.  Don't get me wrong.  This building will be spectacular and beautiful in it's own right, but it's probably considered more "infill" than anything else.  What can I say, I do have huge expensive supertall dreams for this GREAT super city we call Houston !

    • Like 9
  3. 2 hours ago, Naviguessor said:

    Archfan. If your talking bout the underside of the roof, around the courtyards...that’s not mildew. Those surfaces are actually reflective which looks dark or smudged in the photos.  I also see what may appear to be growth on one of the exterior surfaces, which is a shadow of a tree.  I was there last weekend and didn’t notice any mildew, anywhere. The place is as blindingly white and a trump fever rally in a snowstorm. 

    Good one !  Brought a smile to my face on a hard working Thursday LOL thank you !

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Reefmonkey said:

    I don't know about how having a mediocre theme park would affect our chances of getting a decent one, though I'll take your word for it, but I do agree with you that the plans for the park kinda suck. For one thing, beating the whole "Texas" theme to death. I think about all the successful theme parks out there, from Magic Kingdom to the various Six Flags, Animal Kingdom, the Universals, etc, a big part of what makes them successful is the theming that transports you somewhere other than the place you are. I've been all around Texas, and if I want to see it again, I can get in my car and go see the real thing, so I'm not interested in a cheesy facsimile of it. Considering how poorly managed the planning and development and marketing of this park has been, I think it's pretty safe to assume that they didn't do their due diligence on planning the theming to make sure it would create a sustainable draw of visitors, and you know the execution is going to suck, too.

    Yes, agreed.  The whole "Texas" thing is beaten to death and run into the ground lately, especially IN TEXAS - go figure.  Time to diversify and think outside the Texas box for once.

  5. 1 minute ago, Avossos said:

     

     

    Midtown at 40-50 feet seems right. No idea about the other areas...

    I've looked at elevation maps of Houston endlessly for years.  Indeed, there is great variation in elevation, from right at sea level off to the southeast and at the bottom of the east end of Buffalo Bayou, upwards to over 100 feet out near West Oaks and northward near IAH.  Downtown proper including Midtown, has elevations that range between 40 feet to near 60 feet.  Not a huge difference, but in an area considered so "flat" any elevation changes over an area are interesting to those that are looking around and paying attention to the lay of the land.  For instance, driving north on Kirby, then east out of River Oaks and onto Allen speedway - oops Parkway... one can really see the difference between the bottom of the Bayou near 10 or 20 feet elevation to near 55 to 60 feet in that part of River Oaks, with the beautiful undulating, albeit small, front yards and banks of the Bayou, even on the roads to some degree.  I'm no expert, but if you want to look around and look closer at our flat terrain, you can always spot a natural elevation variation in many areas just by looking closer.  Out in Brookshire, where I grew up, the elevation even rises to a whopping 165 feet - wow :) and as some one else pointed out, near 200 feet towards Conroe and The Woodlands.  A lot of rambling about elevation, I know, but I still find Houston's topography fascinating and ever so important to determining flood prone areas versus those that are reasonably safer from inundation.  And yes, ALL of the areas I mentioned here are still in the Houston area, though may not be considered in the "city limits". I'm not sure what city limits really means for us in Houston anyway.  WE have no limits !

     

  6. 43 minutes ago, ekdrm2d1 said:

     

    Different subject, not about livestock.

     

    Hopefuly we will get something else rather than the land to be focused on cattle and horses. 

     

    Agreed.  There's already way more than enough cow and horse manure and so forth in Texas than anyone should ever need, including at the State Capitol.

     

  7. 49 minutes ago, Triton said:

     

    There's the residential tower! :o

    WOW what a gorgeous tower !  Can't wait to see it go up along with that nice residential tower just to the north appearing in the renderings, to take shape.  Although, not to rain on anyone's parade, I just wish it were about 30 stories higher :)  But, I'll take it and most Houstonians will love it no doubt.  Way to go Hines !

     

  8. On 7/2/2018 at 0:09 PM, Rube88 said:

    Well then I am sure the dispenser will get fixed once a committee is appointed to determine the issue. Then they will conduct environmental studies to see if the dispenser is in fact causing issues to the ecosystem. Then they will....well it may be some time before it gets fixed.

    typical talking points from the wrong direction and wrong side of history, but good luck with that sweetheart.

  9. On 5/21/2018 at 0:02 PM, ChannelTwoNews said:

    This is very welcome news, indeed !   Why they wanted to move and then stay in the dfw area I'll never know, except you know, probably tillerson.  But, as we have seen time and time again, the center of the energy industry and hot action is and remains Houston, PERIOD.  Exxon/Mobile, come-on-down !

    • Like 5
  10. 18 hours ago, H-Town Man said:

     

    I think there's more to do in downtown Houston than in downtown Austin (full disclosure: I live in Austin). You have legit performing arts and major league sports, in addition to the restaurants, parks, and conventions. You can get on the train and go to the museums or Hermann Park. I guess it depends on taste. I like hearing a Respighi symphony more than another band trying to sound like Willie Nelson. And Houston's downtown manages more of a big city, New York feel, whereas downtown Austin seems to have more of a casual, recreational feel. 

     

    Also, since this is an architecture forum, I would be remiss not to mention the architecture. You can either have internationally significant examples of nearly every movement in high rise architecture since the 1920's, or you can have a bunch of postmodern glass with balconies.

    Well said H-Town and I totally agree. 

    Having grown up in and around this gigantic metropolis until I was in my mid-30's, I've either seen or read about and then noticed every example of architecture within the time frame you mentioned.  Only Houston did it way better than everyone else, but never gloated about it before and just kept on doing it's creative wonderful independent "thing" while other Texas cities, who shall remain nameless, constantly touted themselves as the ultimate place to be, especially for TX.  This has turned out to be so much hot air and not much more, if you've visited these other cities and compared them to Houston over time.  Houston has always been THE big city for Texas in it's history at least from the early 20th century on to today.  I see that only accelerating from this point forward to the foreseeable future.  Proof?  Look around you- incredible growth rates on scales we haven't really see sustained before in our history, most of the growth coming in the form on millennials and young people just starting out, especially college graduates, international immigration on a huge scale to our city with no limits, many new architecturally significant projects all over town, but especially downtown with so many more in the works or in serious planning stages, technology growth both originating and coming into our area as our society in America progresses in science, technology, aerospace, and medicine.  AND, let's not forget, even Harvey couldn't stop this growth and progress for Houston.  That's pretty much the definition of a "disastrous" event.  Not that worse things can still happen and may still in the future, but all things being equal, Houston will continue to grow phenomenally as it has for most of it's history, where the people and policies have determined what their future will be, and not the politics of Washington or our State lawmakers. 

    As for modern day Austin?  Well, I'm sad to say, not so much...  I also lived in Austin straight out of college from roughly 1985-90.  It was a much more interesting city back then and didn't try to bite off more than it could chew.  Seems as has been said, that the pace of the population growth there was never (and is still not being addressed properly) anticipated to be as large as it is today.  Therefore, the experience of living there is no more genuine that it used to be due to so much clogged traffic and congestion, and being taken over by too much "new money" that doesn't fit in with Austin's original way of life that was so wonderful, even into the early 1990's.  There seems to be much more a division and segregation of wealthy people (newcomers) concentrated surrounding the city on the western Hill Country side and downtown, and the not so wealthy people now being pushed further east and southeast of the city limits than ever before.  Surprising for a city that is supposedly "liberal" thinking, but bears little resemblance to that ideal these days it would seem.  Could this all have something to do with the tilt in national politics and the takeover of our state government from one party to the other during the late 90's ?  You can decide that for yourself.  I'm only trying to highlight what I believe are important factors in the changes we are seeing for our beloved Austin.  Yet, despite all the weird, and downright ghastly changes it is undergoing, Austin will always stay in my heart as a wonderful experience where I first began making my way in life, before moving back to Houston to evolve into the person I remain to this day.

    I guess in a lot of ways, population being the main exception, Houston and Austin are getting more and more similar, as one moves towards the right and the other moves more to the left.  They seem to meet somewhere in the middle, overall. 

    Having said all of that (I know, quite a bundle of thoughts, right LOL!) in closing, I just have to say HOUSTON will always be my one true home.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 2
  11. On 5/8/2018 at 11:15 AM, Nate99 said:

     

    Indeed. 

     

    BSW-Houston-1982PRINT_large.jpg

    I love it !  Would be so nice to see Houston finally break that 75 story "ceiling" as it were.  Wishful thinking I know, but a couple of big towers between 80 and 100 floors would do wonders for our already impressive skyline and prestige !!

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...