Jump to content

H-Town Man

Full Member
  • Posts

    4,971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by H-Town Man

  1. People seem to think that because nothing has been done, all the previous ideas wouldn't have worked. But we have no idea if they would have worked or not, because none of them were done. It's very possible we could have had a working facility by now that would be a huge point of pride for the city and county and one of, if not the most notable historical landmark in Houston.
  2. No, my point was that Minute Maid Park hadn't been a good catalyst for development, because of a combination of those factors and the fact that there are better areas of downtown that lack some of those drawbacks. Petco has enviable development and shows that factors such as parking and dead days can be overcome, but Petco is not a good comparison because it offers great views to nearby highrises (almost as nice a visual amenity as Discovery Green) and doesn't have a roof that closes over it.
  3. I'm not sure what you're driving at. My point is that, right now, most people would probably rather live close to Main St./Market Square or Discovery Green and walk to Minute Maid than live next to Minute Maid. From the photo you post of Petco, the view into the park is gorgeous and has attracted highrises with that view as a selling point. With Minute Maid, views into the park aren't much of a factor for development outside because the roof is almost always closed. I'm not sure whether it is common for ballparks to offer views to outside buildings. Some ballparks do. But not Minute Maid. Why do you think more development has happened in other parts of downtown than around Minute Maid? I've attempted to offer a few reasons. What do you think?
  4. Yes, traffic is better there than around NRG. But I am comparing living at MMP to other parts of downtown, which is the more pertinent decision if you are a developer or someone looking to live downtown. Right now if you could live near Main St./Market Square or Discovery Green and walk to MMP, this seems like the better deal. Petco is a little different since everything is full thanks to the waterfront so you're not living in an empty zone. Also, the point about interior visibility is that the attraction to living next to a ballpark in some cities is getting to watch the game from your balcony, but it wouldn't work at MMP since the roof is usually closed and the site across the street from left field has been developed. But you are right, it is impossible to see inside the theatre buildings.
  5. Would you want to live next to MMP? Every other night for 6-7 months of the year you have dramatic spikes in traffic and crowds; the rest of the time you have a giant dead zone next to you. Tons of parking lots everywhere. You can't see into the park, and after a few weeks the whole "Wow! That's Minute Maid Park!" feeling wears off. It's not like there's a good bar district now that the only neighborhood sports bars next to MMP have been bulldozed. I don't see any advantage to living there, unless you're right on Texas Ave. or between it and Discovery Green. If you want to watch games, live somewhere near Main St. and walk to games.
  6. I think the office landlords feel a pressure to do some kind of little renovation so that they can tout to potential tenants that it's been renovated. Just a little splash of newness in the common areas is what most office renovations amount to. In this case, it does not seem apparent why a plaza with a glass wedge sticking into it would be any more pedestrian-friendly than an open plaza. When you think of great office plazas like the Federal Center in Chicago, there are no glass wedges jutting out of the buildings, just crisp open plazas. I could just as easily see, if the wedge had been built originally, them saying "We are removing an obtrusive 1980's glass wedge in order to create more open space and enhance walkability for a new generation that desires these things."
  7. I do wonder how many short hitters of the past had his power, and what sort of weight lifting/supplements regimen is necessary for that physique. In most eras of baseball history Altuve is either an infield hitter with wicked bunt skills or maybe decides to be a horse jockey instead of baseball. The fact that he is a power hitter with 20 home runs at mid-season is very unusual. Note that I literally love Altuve and think he's the Astro GOAT.
  8. I am kind of surprised that the concrete paving of the bayou channel has lasted so well. Considering that the concrete at the condo tower that collapsed in Florida was "rapidly deteriorating" because of standing pools of water, this must be a very different type of concrete if it can go 70+ years of constant water and debris and still look like it's ready for another 70.
  9. Wow, thanks. Pretty much confirms that Discovery Green is the greatest idea anyone has had for downtown in the modern era. I am rather surprised that more has not been done in the Historic District, which is most likely because there are few sites large enough to build a large building with a parking garage. We need to learn how to do fine-grained development.
  10. Rode this as a kid. It was fun, meeting other people and talking to them. I remember stepping on gum somewhere and tracking it around the train. Funny how things like that stay in your mind. Any train to Galveston would require additional bus usage getting around Galveston and will likely not be attractive to people who do not typically ride buses. Especially if you have kids and are carrying all the bags of swim articles. I love trains but driving the car to Galveston is just so easy.
  11. 59 is still being sunk through the Museum District, correct? Is the 59/288 extra-wide section still being rebuilt? How long until you think TxDOT comes back with another (scaled-back) plan for I-45? I could see it being widened north of 610 but left at its current size inside 610, similar to the Katy Freeway.
  12. Come on man, this HGAC vote is like the 2017 World Series for him. You're not going to take it away. It's going to be cherished forever.
  13. The stretch from the Calumet River in Illinois to Burns Harbor, Indiana, is pretty big. We may have them beat, though.
  14. I wonder what the turnover of all those residents would have been anyway? Multi-family resident moves, on average, once every 18-24 months? Single-family resident in low-income neighborhood along a freeway moves, on average, once every 3 years? Public and low-income housing resident probably less time?
  15. This is a very imperfect way of assessing public opinion. People typically have two choices on a politician to vote for and they may decide based on a totally different reason. When the current slate of city and county politicians was voted on, no one had any idea that they were going to sue to stop a freeway expansion. Most of the county commissioners we ended up with came from straight-ticket voting fueled by ire at Trump and people had no idea that voting Democrat meant that the city's largest road project would be halted as the politicians responded to small, vocal activist groups. One could argue that they *should* have known that given that it happens in cities all over the country, but we have never seen it happen like this in Houston. I really don't think we have any reliable info on public opinion about this project, other than the historical rule of thumb that freeway expansions are opposed by people living next to the freeways as well as urban planning wonks, and supported by just about everyone else.
  16. Because the HGAC members who oppose are appointed by the politicians who oppose the project. You are beholden to the person who appointed you. An HGAC vote is not the same as a public opinion poll.
  17. The relevant comparison would be property taxes of office buildings downtown vs. property taxes of office buildings in the burbs. Right now, land value makes up about a third of the total assessed value of a typical office building. So the property tax is only 1/3 affected by location. The rest of the tax is based on building value, and a building can be equally nice downtown or in the burbs. But if you base the whole tax on land value, and your downtown land is worth $300-400/SF whereas your suburban office area land value is $15-20/SF, your downtown taxes will now be twenty times the suburban taxes for the same building. There are some factors that will diminish this. A suburban building probably takes up more land because land is cheaper; it has a sprawling garage and some gardens rather than all being stacked on a single block, 2-3 acres instead of 1 acre. And of course downtown land values would sink if such a law were enacted, so that will diminish the difference a bit more. But there would still be a much sharper difference in taxation for downtown vs. suburban offices, because you've based the whole tax on location.
  18. Studies have shown that people who choose to live next to a freeway are more likely to be displaced by freeway expansions. This is a huge problem, because in no way should these people be more affected by freeway expansions than everybody else. Absolutely none.
  19. I'm glad that building didn't happen, it would have loomed over the field and blocked off the view of most of the skyline. Instead we got a midrise there that will protect the view of the historic district from the upper levels. True no highrises from that angle, but if you were sitting further down the right field line, you would see 4 new residential highrises in your view (Catalyst, Aris, Brava, Market Square Tower). This is a bummer. Does not bode well for the post office redo.
  20. SH 45 allows you to drive back to I-35 south of Austin, or you can stay on 130. They made it very easy to bypass just Austin or to bypass the whole congested I-35 corridor from Austin to San Antonio.
  21. The amount of glass and stone filling the sky towards Market Square is a little disheartening. I like these buildings but am a little sad for what might have been with a less officey feel in the historic district. More rainfall here.
  22. Someone should do a Monty Python-esque sketch about when the pioneers decided they were going to expand Montgomery Road back when it was a one-lane dirt wagon trail and some guy shows up with a sheaf of papers babbling on about how all the studies show that expanding any road just creates induced demand and leads to the same traffic congestion in the future, just look at what happened when they expanded the San Felipe Road to where two wagons could ride abreast, and now on market days you have a double row of wagons stretching all the way back to the Westheimer farm. All that expanding Montgomery Road is going to do is bring these same problems to North Houston and ruin neighborhoods and disadvantage minority groups such as the natives living up around Green's Point. Just stop building new roads. Because all it does is bring congestion.
×
×
  • Create New...